BMC have released an all-new Fourstroke, their full-suspension cross country platform. The biggest news is the race-ready Fourstroke 01 model has what BMC call "the first ever fully integrated, automatic dropper post."
Pinkbike photographer Andy Vathis spotted this prototype version back in 2019.
By "automatic", they mean it can extend and drop at the push of a button, without the rider having to compress the seatpost manually by squatting down on the saddle. BMC call this Autodrop, and the advantage is obvious. Come into a descent and need the saddle out the way? Just press the button and it's gone. No need to stop pedalling, squat down on the saddle and stand back up before you can attack the descent. That's probably not a big deal to the average rider, but used many times over the course of a World Cup race it could add up.
During a race, we activate Autodrop up to a hundred times allowing us to focus entirely on the track and giving us the gold-medal-winning advantage.—Titouan Carod, BMC MTB Racing Team
A normal dropper post gets the energy it needs to return from a spring, which is compressed by the rider pushing down on the saddle. In technical engineering terms, dropper posts are ass-powered. BMC's Autodrop post, however, is air-powered. There's a tank of compressed air in the down tube, which is inflated via a Schrader valve to 14 Bar (200 psi). When the remote button is pressed with the saddle up, the compressed air pushes on a piston which forces the post down and compresses a small coil spring. When the button is pressed again, the air is released and the coil spring returns the post to the extended position.
BMC say the seatpost can do this up to one hundred times; when the pressure drops below 4 Bar (50 psi), it can no longer drop automatically, but it will still function like a regular (ass-powered) dropper post. BMC say that "During a race, BMC riders activate Autodrop up to a hundred times", suggesting they might use the full Autodrop capacity over a long race, perhaps finishing with effectively a "normal" dropper.
The seatpost offers 80 mm of travel and only has a high and a low position - it cannot be set to an intermediate height. There's no word on the weight, but it's based on BMC's RAD seatpost, which shares the same integrated design and oval cross-section. That post is claimed to weigh just 345g, but BMC admit the air tank alone adds 120 grams to the frame weight.
The top-spec Fourstroke 01 LTD's total weight is claimed to be 10.5 kg (23.1 lb). That's not the lightest by race bike standards, but the company acknowledges this. They say their dual-link APS suspension system is heavier than the flex-stay-single-pivot layout that's become nearly ubiquitous in the category. But BMC say their approach more than makes up for the weight penalty: "Extensive testing shows that the Fourstroke and APS suspension are faster than lighter bikes that feature weight-saving suspension systems, proving that superior traction and pedalling efficiency are more important than weight." Obviously, take any company's claims of "extensive [internal] testing" with due scepticism, but it's interesting to see BMC openly sacrifice lightness for overall performance in the XC category, both with the suspension design and the Autodrop feature.
Models
The top-of-the-range Fourstroke 01 LTD
BMC's naming convention is more than a little confusing. The Fourstroke 01 is the no-compromise race bike, and is the only model to use the integrated Autodrop seatpost. It has 100 mm of travel at each end, with 32 mm stanchion forks. There are three spec levels under the Fourstroke 01 banner, all of which offer Autodrop. These are the Fourstroke 01 LTD (€ 12,999), the confusingly-named Fourstroke 01 ONE (€ 10,999), and the Fourstroke 01 TWO (€ 8,999). There's also the Fourstroke 01 FRS V1 frame, shock, fork and seatpost (€ 5,499).
The Fourstroke ONE. (Not to be confused with the Fourstroke 01, obviously.)
Then there's the Fourstroke (minus the "01" part). This is similar to the Fourstroke 01, except it has a regular 31.6 mm diameter (round) seat tube, and so cannot take advantage of the integrated Autodrop or RAD droppers, which both have an oval cross-section. There are four spec levels: ONE (€ 7,499), TWO (€ 6,499), THREE (€ 5,299) and FOUR (€ 4,299).
The Fourstroke LT LTD
Finally, there's the Fourstroke LT, which of course stands for long travel. With a longer shock and fork, it delivers 120 mm of travel at each end but is otherwise similar to the regular Fourstroke. There are three spec levels: LTD (€ 11,499), ONE (€ 5,899) and TWO (€ 4,499).
Geometry
All three versions have similar geometry. For an XC race bike, the numbers are decidedly on the progressive side, with a 66.5-degree head angle and a 76.7-degree seat angle. The frame geometry of the Fourstroke and Fourstroke 01 are identical, though the cockpit proportions of the 01 are more aggressive. The LT version is near identical too, with no change to the frame angles. Instead, a longer fork and shock create a 15 mm increase in bottom bracket height when the suspension is fully extended.
Availability
The Fourstroke 01 LTD and ONE are available from June 2023, TWO from October 2022 and FRS VAR1 from February 2023, and cost 12,999 (13,499 USD), 10,999 (11,499 USD), 8,999 (9,499 USD) and 5,499 (5,999 USD) euros respectively.
Fourstroke ONE is available from October 2022, TWO from April 2023, THREE from June 2023 and FOUR from September 2023, and cost 7,499 (7,999 USD), 6,499 (6,999 USD), 5,299 (5,799 USD), and 4,299 (4,699 USD) euros respectively.
Fourstroke LT LTD is available from April 2023, ONE from January 2023 and TWO from September 2023, and cost 11,999 (12,499 USD), 5,899 (6,399 USD), 4,499 (4,999 USD) euros respectively.
I have been waiting for this!The rhythm that you lose by having to stop pedaling, sitting down, into a low position and standing back up. I hope more XC oriented droppers go in this direction.
Agreed so much as an XC racer boi. I try to explain to my endurobro friends on why this is wanted as they are like "just squat down on it"..
Stopping pedaling to use my weight to drop the dropper multiplied x's probably 25x's per lap , x'd 3 laps = I just tend to not use the dropper in races and only in casual riding.
Now the question of reliability will remain to be seen with bmc.
@txcx166: it's a race bike so as long as there are enough cycles to cover a vast majority of your race, who cares how you refill it. IF you wanted to modify the concept to Enduro racing you would have more stroke so less cycles per air tank but shorter race time. Refill it while waiting for the next run with a shock pump as you suggested. For recreational riding, I don't want to waste time refilling the air tank so go with the "traditional" "ass powered" post.
You really need to try a Transfer SL, it's so light that you barely need to apply weight to it, it also returns VERY fast, i now find myself using it only for a few seconds, it has been a game changer on races
The naming convention couldn't be worse.
You can get a Fourstroke 1, One, or a Fourstroke One, or a Fourstroke LT, One, or a Fourstroke Lt, LTD, or a Fourstroke 1 LTD.
So Dumb.
SAME. I've always felt that droppers were "backwards" with regards to what happens when you hit the remote. Though I understood the mechanical reasons.
@mab411: If they were only one direction but the opposite of how they are now how would you get your dropper back up? By clenching your saddle firmly between your cheeks and standing up?
@jmd07aa: yep and it is a super light and cheap system. You open the clamp and the saddle goes down by itself. You can then pull it up and close the clamp.
@jmd07aa: First off, I have VERY dexterous butt cheeks. Back in the day, I could tie shoes WITH a double knot, then do trigonometry on a TI-65. I had a whole show put together, helped pay for books in college. I'd be typing this with them right now if I weren't sitting in front of a classroom of 8th graders.
Second...I dunno, I'm just the idea man. But the fuzzy idea I had was something that provided pressure for it to stay up, probably with some kind of latch to keep it firm, then when you hit the lever the latch is released and whatever provides the pressure is isolated from the system, causing it to fall. (Edit: or some kind of motor.) But the smart folks at BMC have a much better plan. Wonder if they'll release an after-market version?
I'm holding out for the return of Shimano Airlines so I can integrate the air can into both my shifting and seatpost. That way if I drop my seat too often, I also won't be able to shift.
I'll admit that the bike is innovative with all the right angles and I'm sure it rides great, but it's not a beautiful bike like the previous generation.
This rear triangle looks like it was borrowed from some other bike.
Seriously lol. I love Cervelo's road bikes as much as the next guy, even if they are a bit... erm, yeti-ish... But that hardtail is sorta sad. I'd rather them rebrand a SC.
Won't stop people from buying it lol.
I'm impressed. Innovation for the race-bike, and conventional round seatpost for others. I like the commitment to a four-bar suspension over the trend towards flex stays these days, too.
And best of all, without headset routing. Kudos BMC, Cervelo can learn a lot from them.
@AddisonEverett: I'm pretty sure this still counts as a four bar: 1) bottom link, 2) rear triangle, 3) top link, 4) shock. Just a different configuration than a Horst four bar with 1) chainstay, 2) seatstay, 3) top link, 4) shock.
@AddisonEverett: the rear triangle is a link, one of four, the ground link is the frame, and the co-rotators are the input and the rocker links, the shock is not a link but obviously is what limits the motion, so think of it as a dyad aka a sliding link.
Exactly my thoughts. Headangle nice, no shitty cable routing, VPP. Only comparable frames with 100mm are Unno, Mondraker, Ibis and Stoll, any1 knows more? I mean around 67 degree headangle and VPP.
I dont need a Cross Country bike, but if I did I would strongly consider a BMC. They make cool bikes, and for whatever reason I think the aluminum 2 stroke a really cool bike.
The elephant in the room is the excessive weight that the air tank adds, it’s not just the weight of the tank it’s the weight of the compressed air ie. 200 pounds per square inch is huge.
why not just use Helium... that should negate any extra weight.
Maybe use in the tires as well, then this bike would be like 8 lbs total with the tires trying to lift the bike like Helium balloons. RACE WEIGHT and easy to jump stuff too.
@owl-X: And in a few years, people will be cycling it multiple times in the air and freeride purists at Rampage will be complaining that Brendog was robbed by "Drop to Top" judging.
hopefully thay can integrate this into a seatpost where the valve is somewhere on the top. then it could work with any bike. I would get one for sure. This is the type of mechanical integration that i would like to see. No apps, no batteries, no subscriptions, just a simple mechanical solution to a problem, that's so mtb
switchback249 (2 hours ago) "It'll be interesting to see how you diagnose/access any air leaks on the integrated air tank."
Just a guess but BMC dealers will be supplied with a lap pool placed in the back alley. Toss the complete bike in and yell, "Okay Fourstroke, let's see you do the breaststroke!". Reminiscent of witch dunking in the 1700's, if it sinks you know it was fine.
Yes BMC! Now make that air bladder be able to re inflate tires when needed. On board compressor. Mabey even have the fork be able to pressurize the chamber too.
@LeDuke: How many XC race bikes had a 66.5° HTA in 2019? Most trail bikes had steeper HTAs than that in 2019.
It's not like other companies aren't slacking out their XC bikes, but most seem scared to even go below 68°. There are still a few bikes being sold with HTAs of 69° or greater.
I just want a seat post, that when its all the way up...it firms up my shock damper (configurable perhaps?). When its all the way down, everything is wide open.
I hope you are being ironic as BMC literally had this with their Trailsync technology on their trail bikes. It does not look like their current bikes use it now though.
I don't care about the XC side of things but for these new school 150-160 bikes, its perfect. Suspension gets much better simply because no longer do companies have to really focus on climb capabilities (as much at least) because this simple dropper post/damper system firms it up automatically. We'd get sprite climbing 160 bikes that go Full-DH with the dropper simply down. In the day where everyone is stupidly using sensors and Ai, the simply human controlled system using a damn lever I'm already pressing is a no-brainer.
I can't wait for this to come in longer options. I'm always checking tire pressure before each ride, so I don't mind at all checking my post pressure too. Plus, if it runs out of air it still works like like today's posts. I'll buy one to support this development.
They should design it so you can recharge your canister by sitting on it from full extension. Although you'd probably have to pull it up and/or do multiple cycles of that as if you were pumping it up with a floor pump...and the seals would be tricky...hmm
I think the way this works is to bleed off the pressure inside the post when you lower the post automatically.
Basically, it’s a normal post until you auto drop it, then it uses the compressed air to act like your body weight. When the post hits bottom, it releases the Autodrop air (small volume, high pressure) to atmosphere. I imagine the action or resistance of the drop is very light, and very fast return, and it locks at both top and bottom position.
Then the normal posts pressure pushes it back up.
If the post could act like a pump it would have a lot more resistance during Autodrop and likely require significantly more volume in the tank.
I like it. I mean, I don't race so not really needed for me right away, but I could see it becoming more universal. If the tank was larger (so low enough psi for a tire floor pump), it'd be only slightly more work to pressurize before a ride. I already have to check and usually top off tires, this is just another 30-60 seconds of pumping.
I'm really amazed the AXS post didn't include an electric version of this. It just seems so obvious that it's exclusion is baffling. It also would have made the price tag a little more palatable.
@FloImSchnee: I don't think it would be that hard actually. Sure, maybe if you retain the current architecture of a gas or coil spring it's not really any easier. But there are other ways to make a drive a tube up and down within another tube. Just off the top of my head I'm envisioning a high rpm motor driving a worm gear hooked up to a rack gear all stuffed inside the tubes. And that's just the first thing that comes to mind so there could definitely be a better solution. If they're going to have battery power, they should use it!
@freetors: It's definitely possible, the trick is always getting it into a package that's competitive on both price and weight. I'm pretty sure you would need a motor that's a decent bit more powerful than e.g. an electronic derailleur motor, which means you also need a bigger battery, and then you end up with a product that's a few hundred grams heavier AND a few hundred euro/dollars more than a normal ass-powered dropper. Would you be willing to pay €1k for a 1kg dropper with this functionality? There might be some people who would but i think it would be a very niche product.
Mixed feelings about this bike. Huge respect to BMC for genuine innovation on the dropper post. This follows the trend extreme cleverness and out-of-the-box thinking that started with the URS.
But, although this looks like a great dedicated World Cup race bike, I would be hesitant to buy, even as someone who almost exclusively rides race-y XC, because:
-80 mm drop is not enough for most users outside of a race situation, and many other XC bikes can now run 125 mm+ ultralight posts (e.g. the KS Lev Ci) that allow them to become virtual short-travel trail bikes that are very versatile.
-Despite moving the shock to the top tube, there's no second bottle cage in the triangle, which is a huge advantage of most XC bikes with this design (e.g. the Epic). One of my favorite things about the Epic is that I can leave my hydration pack at home for any ride under 3 hours.
@mariano69id: yeah, but getting rid of the integrated dropper moots the most interesting feature of the bike.
As far as bottle cages - No mounts on the seat tube. Looks like I guess you could run two on the downtube? I've never seen that before and seems like it wouldn't work on small sizes.
Praise where praise is due: The geometry looks spot on. I love that the trend of progressive geometry FINALLY seems to have arrived in the XC world. With this BMC, the Scott Spark RC and a couple others there's now a really decent choice of new-school XC race bikes available.
Onto the negatives: Although I've got lots of respect for BMCs engineering efforts, I personally (as an avid hobby XC racer) don't really see any tangible advantage over a regular dropper post. And besides not really seing how this would benefit me, I would definitley not want to be locked into their fully proprietary integrated dropper post system. Especially since it can't be swapped with a regular dropper. Same reason why I would never buy a Specialized Epic or Trek Supercaliber.
Progressive geometry has definitely been increasingly the norm in XC bikes and it's awesome. But 66.5°, that's wild! That's slacker than a World Cup DH bike from when I started riding in the early 2000s.
I gotta wonder if they're overshooting the optimum at this point. My Epic has a 67.5° head tube and it doesn't feel like much of a liability in the twisties, but it definitely feels more ponderous than the 69.5° on my '18 Epic or the 71.75° on the '14 (that bike was TWITCHY). How far does it go?
I'm half-inclined to support the UCI passing a rule saying "no stored energy is allowed on race bikes". Of course, that would eliminate electronic shifting as well. But, it is a bit weird to have batteries and pressure vessels to store energy for shifter actuation, dropper actuation, and dropper movement. On the other hand, as a guy who has never had electronic shifting, it sure seems like the reduced maintenance might be worth a lot to me. So, a rule against electronic shifting may be bad for participation by weekend warriors in races.
No stored energy would be a really good rule and would do a lot to get costs under control and bring back the simple charm of the bicycle.
A lot of people love their electronic shifting, but IMO as an AXS owner, it's a quality-of-life net negative. The benefits are usually bullshit. Less maintenance? What? I spend 10x the thought and effort charging than I ever did on running a cable every 1-2 years. And then there's "faster shifts" which is nonsense, since shift speed is all about cassette rotational speed, not actuation.
Mechanical MTB groups were so, so good before electronic, and the fact XTR continues to compete on equal footing with the SRAM robo-groups absolutely proves this. I would trade my AXS group straight up for the mech equivalent if it wasn't for resale and logistics.
Its powered by pressurised air and runs out as you use it. >>>>> It won't be adopted into mainstream use. Simple as that. @BMC you have wasted your money on this one.
Which is a shame as a self dropping dropper is a great idea if done right. But this isn't the way. I haven't come up with any better alternatives, but BMC are gonna lose money with this one. Soz
I came here wanting to hate on an "automatic" seat post that, I assumed, used electronics to decide when to drop and left impressed at what is a very elegant solution to a problem I didn't know I had. Now I want, no, _need_ an automatic seat post on all my bikes! I'm not even being sarcastic here. Pneumatics are cooler than electronics in a steampunk kind of way. #shimanoairlines Who wants *beep* *zzzzzzzzzzzt* when you can have cool *pshhhhht* noises. Also you can recharge your pneumatics on a ride with the pump you carry in your pack.
For a trail or enduro version it'd have to be possible to stop partway down. This version seems like it'd need a hyd carriage to hold rider weight in the up position. so theoretically it'd be possible to stop half way down, but it looks like this version is up or down only, which seems the norm for xc race posts.
Needs a tiny peristaltic pump at the non-drive bb/crank meet. The preload ring could be used as the 'fingers' to drive air through a tube wrapped around it.
It would suck to discover only after you're trying to lean your bike into a corner that the post was running on empty and the seat didn't go down when you thought it would. I was renting a Scott e-bike (long story) and because of their asinine linkage, the bike has a tendency to yank down on the dropper post cable and thus pull the release when you don't expect it. So I'd dropped my seat before a flat turn, started leaning the bike over, and then instantly washed out when the seat hit my leg. That sort of thing (your seat should be down but surprises you with being still up) could well happen if you have a long ride, you're a bit tired and focused on other things, and you don't notice that the seat is apparently no longer charged up enough to make it down on its own.
I wonder if things like these will get banned from races because it's employing external power ( admittedly small amounts). In HPV races for example ice vests were banned for that reason...
Genuinely curious - is the way this is implemented (weight aside) the way that XC racers want, with no intermediate position?
Seems that ideally you'd just want a post that alleviated your legs from the work of squatting but still gave you infinitely adjustable saddle position.
Nice bike and nice geometry in the lt ,and the price of the frame with a fork and dropper bot a bad thing ,considering other brands that cost almost the same but only for the frame ,very nice BMC
@JSTootell: Yeah, not surprising, since many/most XC bikes can’t carry two. But for me it’s a dealbreaker. A large reason why I’ve stuck with the Epic vs. the Spark (still only one on Small frames), Fourstroke, F-Podium, etc.
@nattyd: Intense Sniper can carry a second bottle on the downtube. I didn't like the Epic myself, but love the Sniper. I'm in between sizes and went small since it was on sale and overall like it.
Best guestimate, about ¼ of the top 20 riders this morning had a pack.
you gotta love how they use a photo of a dude descending awkwardly, all his weight behind the fully extended dropper, in an advertisement for an 'automatic' dropper, that's not actually automatic but doesn't require you to weight the seat because weighting the seating is somehow going to rob you of .0003 seconds.
XC racing is oh-so-silly.
It's called XC simping. You pay thousand of dollars and massive amounts of effort to get a few less seconds (equivalent to a bottle of bath water). Really to only difference is that you're simping after something that isn't a person.
Curious- say you use 100x, and now the pressure is 50psi, requiring ass-power to drop. How many more cycles will the dropper work? What happens at some critically low psi?
Seems needlessly complicated. I never once wished my dropper would go up and down with a press of a lever even when I was learning how to use my first ass-actuated dropper properly. The secret is to use the damn thing all the time. If you're second guessing as to if you should drop your seat at any point in a ride, you should just drop your seat.
It's a BMC. It is made for people who are concerned that squatting down multiple times in a ride with suck 0.8% of their watts away from their legs. Those are consequently the same people who will either pay money for a BMC or will be sponsored by BMC.
@ct0413: It has nothing to do with saving watts, it has everything to do with not needing to change your body position when you decide to drop your seat last minute which is huge advantage if you are racing.
Stopping pedaling to use my weight to drop the dropper multiplied x's probably 25x's per lap , x'd 3 laps = I just tend to not use the dropper in races and only in casual riding.
Now the question of reliability will remain to be seen with bmc.
thats exactly what he described with more words
Practice more.
The last thing you want to do when your legs are burning, is to do a squat.
Second...I dunno, I'm just the idea man. But the fuzzy idea I had was something that provided pressure for it to stay up, probably with some kind of latch to keep it firm, then when you hit the lever the latch is released and whatever provides the pressure is isolated from the system, causing it to fall. (Edit: or some kind of motor.) But the smart folks at BMC have a much better plan. Wonder if they'll release an after-market version?
(I'm kidding, I don't really care, but that would be neat though)
www.pinkbike.com/news/bmc-autodrop-dropper-post-lenzerheide-world-cup-xc-2019.html
highly unlikely that it does both at the same time.
"It'll be interesting to see how you diagnose/access any air leaks on the integrated air tank."
Just a guess but BMC dealers will be supplied with a lap pool placed in the back alley. Toss the complete bike in and yell, "Okay Fourstroke, let's see you do the breaststroke!". Reminiscent of witch dunking in the 1700's, if it sinks you know it was fine.
It's not like other companies aren't slacking out their XC bikes, but most seem scared to even go below 68°. There are still a few bikes being sold with HTAs of 69° or greater.
I don't care about the XC side of things but for these new school 150-160 bikes, its perfect. Suspension gets much better simply because no longer do companies have to really focus on climb capabilities (as much at least) because this simple dropper post/damper system firms it up automatically. We'd get sprite climbing 160 bikes that go Full-DH with the dropper simply down. In the day where everyone is stupidly using sensors and Ai, the simply human controlled system using a damn lever I'm already pressing is a no-brainer.
Basically, it’s a normal post until you auto drop it, then it uses the compressed air to act like your body weight. When the post hits bottom, it releases the Autodrop air (small volume, high pressure) to atmosphere. I imagine the action or resistance of the drop is very light, and very fast return, and it locks at both top and bottom position.
Then the normal posts pressure pushes it back up.
If the post could act like a pump it would have a lot more resistance during Autodrop and likely require significantly more volume in the tank.
But, although this looks like a great dedicated World Cup race bike, I would be hesitant to buy, even as someone who almost exclusively rides race-y XC, because:
-80 mm drop is not enough for most users outside of a race situation, and many other XC bikes can now run 125 mm+ ultralight posts (e.g. the KS Lev Ci) that allow them to become virtual short-travel trail bikes that are very versatile.
-Despite moving the shock to the top tube, there's no second bottle cage in the triangle, which is a huge advantage of most XC bikes with this design (e.g. the Epic). One of my favorite things about the Epic is that I can leave my hydration pack at home for any ride under 3 hours.
As far as bottle cages - No mounts on the seat tube. Looks like I guess you could run two on the downtube? I've never seen that before and seems like it wouldn't work on small sizes.
Onto the negatives: Although I've got lots of respect for BMCs engineering efforts, I personally (as an avid hobby XC racer) don't really see any tangible advantage over a regular dropper post. And besides not really seing how this would benefit me, I would definitley not want to be locked into their fully proprietary integrated dropper post system. Especially since it can't be swapped with a regular dropper. Same reason why I would never buy a Specialized Epic or Trek Supercaliber.
I gotta wonder if they're overshooting the optimum at this point. My Epic has a 67.5° head tube and it doesn't feel like much of a liability in the twisties, but it definitely feels more ponderous than the 69.5° on my '18 Epic or the 71.75° on the '14 (that bike was TWITCHY). How far does it go?
A lot of people love their electronic shifting, but IMO as an AXS owner, it's a quality-of-life net negative. The benefits are usually bullshit. Less maintenance? What? I spend 10x the thought and effort charging than I ever did on running a cable every 1-2 years. And then there's "faster shifts" which is nonsense, since shift speed is all about cassette rotational speed, not actuation.
Mechanical MTB groups were so, so good before electronic, and the fact XTR continues to compete on equal footing with the SRAM robo-groups absolutely proves this. I would trade my AXS group straight up for the mech equivalent if it wasn't for resale and logistics.
Which is a shame as a self dropping dropper is a great idea if done right. But this isn't the way. I haven't come up with any better alternatives, but BMC are gonna lose money with this one. Soz
Pneumatics are cooler than electronics in a steampunk kind of way. #shimanoairlines Who wants *beep* *zzzzzzzzzzzt* when you can have cool *pshhhhht* noises. Also you can recharge your pneumatics on a ride with the pump you carry in your pack.
In HPV races for example ice vests were banned for that reason...
Wait, it would be still ass-powered
Seems that ideally you'd just want a post that alleviated your legs from the work of squatting but still gave you infinitely adjustable saddle position.
I will be curious to see if that is still true when I race around here tomorrow.
Best guestimate, about ¼ of the top 20 riders this morning had a pack.
youtu.be/rP0uuI80wuY