PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Specialized Stumpjumper Alloy
Words by Alicia Leggett; photography by Tom RichardsIt feels like just last week that we released the Field Test review of the
Specialized Stumpjumper Evo Alloy, but it's already time to write about the Stumpy Evo Alloy's budget-oriented little sister, the Stumpjumper Alloy. Like its aggressive sibling, the Stumpjumper Alloy rolls on 29" wheels and is made, as you could probably guess from the name, of aluminum. Specialized describes the Stumpy Alloy as "your all-access pass for trail adventure," which is certainly a promising claim. We put it through its paces in Tucson, Arizona, to see how those words hold up when the tires hit the dirt - err, rocks.
This iteration of the Stumpjumper Alloy arrived in 2021 with updated kinematics, more progressive geometry, and a bit less weight than previous versions, aiming to be that one do-it-all bike that every brand seemingly wants their 130-140mm bike to be.
Specialized Stumpjumper Alloy Details• Travel: 130 mm / 14 0mm
• Aluminum frame
• Wheel size: 29"
• Head angle: 65° - 65.5°
• Seat tube angle: 77.2° - 77.7° (size S4)
• Reach: 475mm - 480 mm (S4)
• Chainstay length: 440 mm - 444 mm
• Sizes: S1 - S6 (S4 tested)
• Weight: 35.6 lbs / 16.1 kg
• Price: $2,650 USD
•
specialized.com Expectations for this Stumpjumper were high from the start. After all, the Stumpjumper webpage manages to use nearly all the bike review cliches, with notes about how the bike is "a refined mid-travel ripper that eats big terrain like a gravity fed beast, handles like a dream everywhere, and climbs like it has a motor" and how the geometry numbers have been tweaked to be more, uh, "carvealicious," but the 200mm rotor up front, beefy tires, and tried-and-true Stumpjumper platform seem up to the task of delivering something good.
Moving beyond the neon salmon color (yes, it also comes in a neutral black and a pleasant sage), the frame has a few things to note. First, unlike the carbon version of this bike, the Stumpjumper Alloy uses a Horst Link design rather than flex stays that we saw appear on the latest carbon version. The Horst layout, in line with all the rest of the full suspension Stumpy's history, makes for a more relaxed ride than the snappier flex stay design, which was borrowed from the much racier Specialized Epic.
The other details look familiar, too: the cables are internally routed, it uses the same asymmetric design as the rest of the Stumpy lineup, and there's a flip chip on the chainstay that can raise or lower the bottom bracket by seven millimeters while changing the head angle by half a degree. Sadly, though, this Stumpjumper has no SWAT Box, so we had to go back to using our pockets and hip packs like we did in the good old days.
The Stumpy Alloy weighs in at 35.6 lbs / 16.1 kg, making it the heaviest of the full suspension bikes on test, though to its credit, it arrived with a proper Specialized Butcher and Purgatory tire combo. The bike also came outfitted with a SRAM SX drivetrain, Tektro Gemini Comp brakes, a RockShox 35 Silver fork, an X-Fusion 02 Pro RL shock, and a TranzX 34.9 mm dropper post with 170mm of travel for the size S4 bike.
It's also worth mentioning that while the Stumpy doesn't have size-specific everything, it does have two chainstay lengths. Sizes S1 to S4 have 440 to 444 mm chainstays, depending on the flip chip position, and sizes S5 and S6 get an extra centimeter of length, coming in at 450 to 454 mm.
ClimbingSpecialized gave the Stumpjumper Alloy a steep seat tube angle, and that forward pedaling position is quite noticeable when climbing. That's a good thing - being centered over the bike while climbing and having a comfortable spot to perch while mashing makes a huge difference in my willingness to actually try on climbs, even if it did make the dropper post even more crucial when on the flats or even choppy climbs to get the post just a little bit out of the way. The steep seat angle also means that those of us with long legs can run the seatpost high without finding ourselves way out over the rear wheel when pedaling.
Overall, the Stumpjumper was a fair and comfortable climber. While it weighs 35.6 pounds, dialed geometry means that it carries the weight well, and it climbs better than some other, lighter bikes.
On both the climbs and the descents, the suspension became a focal point for me. I found it difficult to settle on the right amount of air pressure for the shock, as it performed best on the climbs with a bit of extra air, but the trade-off was a loss of sensitivity on the descents. On the flip side, I thought it settled into the suspension too much on the climbs when the air pressure was optimized for descending. A climb switch on the X-Fusion 02 Pro RL shock somewhat mitigates the issue, and I consider that little lever a nonnegotiable on this bike, but I would have appreciated a slightly firmer pedaling platform all around.
We also need to mention the SRAM SX Eagle drivetrain: none of us loved it, or even liked it. The SX group does get the job done, for the most part, but the shifting lags and doesn't have the satisfying, crisp feel that defines most of SRAM's range. It also uses a conventional HG freehub body, rather than the XD driver used by the upper echelon SRAM groupsets, so someone who wants to upgrade the (heavy) SX cassette to GX or above would need to swap out the freehub body.
Still, the bike does what it needs to do on the climbs: it holds onto every bit of traction, even on the desert rocks, and it's a comfortable bike to pedal, even if it does like to wallow a bit sometimes. Don't we all?
Descending The Stumpjumper's personality on the climbs - comfortable and versatile - showed similarly on the descents, where, for the most part, it soaked up the harsh hits and chatter nicely.
Since it is a Stumpjumper, it's meant to be a well-rounded machine - especially in the alloy version. The bike has been through so many generations over more than 40 years that Specialized has more or less cracked the trail bike code, and this iteration of the Stumpy remains an easy bike to ride.
The 130mm bike handles nicely on the descents, with obvious stability that doesn't overwhelm its ability to play around. Even with the slightly squatty rear suspension, it rides lightly over the sharp desert rocks and feels capable enough to take anywhere an entry-level trail bike should reasonably go.
Throughout the Field Test, we rode the Stumpjumper on a variety of terrain, and the bike definitely isn't a specialist - it feels similarly comfortable on rolling cross-country terrain and choppy, rocky trails. The geometry is essentially what we've come to expect from a modern trail bike, and it works. Compared to many other 130mm bikes, the 65-65.5° head tube angle gives it a pinch of extra stability that pairs nicely with the moderate 440-444mm chainstays on our size S4 test bike: all around, it's a balanced ride. Carvealicious indeed.
My gripes about this particular salmon Stumpy come from the spec, though I know I'm nitpicking, since the fact that a bike this capable exists for $2,650 is impressive in itself.
The X-Fusion 02 Pro RL lacks finesse, with just a rudimentary rebound dial and a climb switch, so there aren't too many settings combinations to play with. Similarly, the RockShox 35 fork does absorb some bumps, but doesn't have the fine-tuning adjustments found on high-end forks. For me, the suspension worked just fine at low speeds, where it did its job of soaking up rocks and giving the bike a pleasant, forgiving feel, but felt less at-home at higher speeds, where the bike felt chattery and I would have appreciated more sensitivity from both the fork and the shock.
I was also underwhelmed by the base-level Tektro brakes, which did have enough power but lacked initial bite.
As for the good parts, I got along with the Specialized Butcher and Purgatory tires famously. The grippy T9 rubber on the Butcher up front and firmer T7 of the Purgatory struck a nice balance with traction and resistance. Plus, avoiding flat tires in the desert is a good thing, right?
It was also nice to spend some time getting to know the TranzX dropper post. The simple, cable-actuated dropper uses a 34.9 mm clamp, has a decent lever, and - the important part - just plain works.
Absolutely. Would be nice to see drivetrains like microshift and box on these budget bikes.
Alas companies like the big S probably get these low end drivetrains for pennies from sram/shimano.
Cheese whiz drivetrain on my daughter’s rocky mtn edge self destructed shortly after buying it and rather than warranty a piece of sht I just put 8 sp microshift on it which was under $100 for shifter/mech and works great for her.
And it shifts better
Status with NX & Code R for
For entry level builds, I actually think 8/9/10 speed is a better experience for newer riders anyways (I'd say for everyone). The point of 12 speeds is closer steps, making the ideal cadence easier. Newer riders don't care about this.
There have been so many occasions where I'm at the local co-op teaching someone to tune their SX or NX drivetrain where we just have to accept that despite being unsatisfied with shifting consistency we just have to call it good. Gotta keep that shit as clean as absolutely possible and even a slightly misaligned hanger can be the cause of many shifting woes.
On a road bike I'm super picky and I need close spacing. Anything less than 2x11 makes it feel like I'm never quite in the right gear. Mountain biking is a different beast.
Now for my actual opinion: SX is not garbage, rather it's a decent drivetrain with a garbage part. Specifically the shifter. It drags the whole system down. Figured this out when sat back one day wondering why SX was so garbage. I had recently blown up the plastic-y derailleur everyone complains about, so I decided to upgrade to an NX. To my surprise, nothing improved. Odd, I thought, since I'd had good experience with NX in the past (LBS employee here). Then I just said screw it and changed the shifter to a GX that was laying around. Night and day difference. The clicks were suddenly more authoritative, and I was satisfied. I think that the SX shifter just doesn't pull the cable well or something. Always feels like your housing is gummed up.
Ultimately I can still get on the "SX sucks" train because no one should have to upgrade right out of the box, but it's not all bad. Heck, the chain on SX, NX, and GX is literally the same fricken thing with different labels.
I've even toyed around with the idea of a 2 or 3 speed setup assembled with singlespeed cogs. Just select a climbing gear, all-around gear, and a descending gear, slap on a derailleur with a clutch, and a decent friction shifter, and call it good. I ran a manually shifted two speed setup for a couple months, ended up just using the 2:1 gear 95% of the time and the 1:1 on like two rides, but it required me to bring along a cone wrench to adjust the tensioner and about a 5 minute swap at the top of the trail. A friend made a townie "tringlespeed" setup with a single cog and dual roller tensioner in the back and a 3 ring front derailleur setup that actually worked pretty nicely (once he put on an Ultegra FD).
For the tinkerers, masochists, and co-op cheapskates out there, there are so many good alternatives to a 1x12 drivetrain. Don't need to go fully into the rabbit hole of custom gearing, or singlespeeder, but for those who are sick and tired of constantly fiddling with barrel adjusters on their 12 speed, one of the many "lesser" gear count drivetrains are the way to go.
Does it count that I said "DOH!" when I accidentally hit submit?
You don't even need the b-bolt upgrade.
I just replaced the original o-ring and washer with a thick rubber o-ring.
And it's super thight and rigid. Even more than the XX1 b-bolt.
Those o-rings are super cheap.
I think we all benefit from good shifting, close spaced gear ratios, but cuts need to be made somewhere….
Hey @mikelevy @brianpark @mikekazimer, maybe a series where we are given a budget, and component costs, and we have to play “Fantasy Product Manager”. Everyone builds and submits our choices to PB, you guys pick a top 10, and then the whole of the community votes on the top 10 to see who the winner is. Could be how you spec the Grim Doughnut for eventual sale…..
SRAMs margin is considerably greater on the GX and up lines. The only reason to produce the budget lines, is to make the higher profit lines more attractive.
Going back several months there in the comments.
We wouldn’t need to know wholesale component pricing, as long as it’s apples to apples who cares.
Wholesale is 50% of catalogue pricing, or thereabouts
(Your capitalized MORE money is $50 at MSRP. Calm down)
$2,600 sounds good until you realize there are very decent $2k and under FS bikes from other companies.
To be fair though this bike does have some lousy parts that will cost a fortune to upgrade. Even less noticeable stuff like hubs, brake rotors, power-spline/square taper bottom bracket suck! Not too mention the fork, shock, brakes, wheels and the whole drivetrain are parts that a serious rider will likely end up swapping out.
There are several bikes out there that offer much better value. For $100 CAD more check out a Norco Fluid FS 1 with some descent parts (RS Pike/Deluxe, SLX drivetrain, 4-pot Deore brakes, better wheels). Plus the Fluid is actually in stock at some local shops, at least here in Canada.
Also, in the US the Fluid is $750 more than the Stumpjumper.
Shit, it's 51 dollars. You got me!
That said the most important component on a bike is the frame. If you don't get along with the geometry or the fit is worng having better components doesn't matter much. I made this mistake myself a few years back buying my first full suspension bike. Maybe talk to your dealer and see if they can help you out.
I always find it weird when facts end up in the cons column. Like, yeah, of course low-end suspension isn't as controlled at higher speeds... Otherwise what would be the point of the high-end stuff?
I feel this should only be a con if the components are lower-end than the average bike at this price, and then the con would be "cheaper suspension components than expected at this price".
Great review overall!
And the spec hurts even more when you are pairing it with stuff liek sram sx and tektro geminis... So you sit there and you just think "ok, all the budget is in the frame". Which is fine, getting the frame right is priority number one, then you sort out parts and specs. But at 2650 the spec is trash and you are buying a frame with a more reliable warranty through a shop. That's about it. Otherwise you can get a Giant with a Bomber or a Commencal with a Yari.
SX, that suspension and Gemini brakes made for 500€ bikes are a waste of ressources.
Same even with the Enduro for 5500€, the NX derailleur lasted only 15mins of bike park on mine, wheels are 2,3kgs, tires paperthin,...
Sure, most of us here think we'll explode those components in two seconds, but Example Dude ain't putting in an 80-day year at the park or doing 300 trail miles in a month, he just wants to ride something that is decently future proof and won't completely explode the first time he accidentally slams it into a waterbar.
Going just slightly lower on the price spectrum quickly gets you into very un-upgradable frames. Or lack of a friendly shop to help out. Maybe that's for you, but it's not for everyone.
*(If you broke a mech in 15 minutes, it doesn't matter how high-end you go, you done f*cked up and anything would've died)
SX and NX have no functional damping like it's still 2005.
I will never buy Canyon and I will always dissuade people from buying that brand.
In fact the second time they no longer produced my frame color so they sent an entire new frame. I know this is just my experience and others may vary but it worth noting
Rummaged up a few hundred more and picked up a bike from the Norco dealer.
does spesh have live chat(before online sales)?
I waited 8 months for first replacement enduro frame then anther 4 months for anther one after i broke it twice.
I've got a yeti sb150 that i can hardly ride because the frame keeps breaking around the infinity link.(currently in a battle with them because apparently at 97kg im too heavy for their bikes, the guy litterly told me i might over the weight limit for it, so expecting a full refund of my sb150.)
Canyon has been better than both those brands....
I have since bought an Enduro from the local Specialized store. I've had zero issues with and when I do the shop is a couple of hours away from me with a full range of spares for instant replacement. No other brand offers that.
That is worth at least €1000 extra to me.
Great, I thought to myself....That proceeded to fail twice more for me and then another time afterwards to the guy who bought it from me.
They are just such crap bikes. The hassle of owning one is not worth it. I bought it as my race bike and I ended up buying a spare used Commencal frame as a back up to race that year. I missed at least 3 races that year because of that heap of crap.
i broke 2 enduro s works frames before dumping it basically.
Other then the chainstay I never had an issues with the bike and liked it a lot. While waiting for the warranty replacement after the second failure I bought a new bike so I could keep my sanity during the summer of 2020 otherwise I probably would have had the Spectral for longer.
I "upgraded" to a OneUp on one my bikes and I'm not convinced it's any better, other than maybe serviceability.
The Nivo is the Lightest dropper available, has a mechanical locking mechanism and is practically free of any worries like air in the system.
I don’t understand why they don’t get more credits ♂️
The only dropper I ever had that lasted without worries,while I went through Levs, Reverbs, a BikeYoke, a Transfer and a OneUp, which all didn't last.
Back in the 90s there were plenty of brands making all sort of cartridges and coil kits for forks,today it seems its only for top of the range suspension.
Imagine a $50 damper with decent quality that you can put on a 35 and improve it.
mrpbike.com/pages/suspension-upgrades
The guy who buys this bike is the overweight guy I work with wants to ride the dirt path with his kids. I tell him he can't go wrong with a Spesh, so he buys it. He doesn't notice any of that other stuff.
Anyone can save up for a $4K+ bike quite easily for a long term bike purchase, if they care much about the sport. This spec isn't for those people.
So when I said branding I really truly meant, branding. Not manufacturing or quality... Literally branding. Marketing lol. The Nike swoosh logo. The Supreme brick. etc.
I find the specs to be a lot more balanced and a lot more on the nose of the value price point, the budget, from Giant and a slew of direct order brands. Trek and Specialized are just laughing on the way to the bank on brand name alone. And with that they want the most common fork stickers on their bikes. They out here sellin logos and stickers man, swear to god lol.
In others,with much lower income,these models are pretty much only what the majority can afford,at least those who are starting or aren't shure if trail MTB is their thing.
i.e. Portugal has a minimum wage fixed at 705€, that's about $750. Yes,monthly.
I got 4000 CAD ( pre covid MSRP of 3600 CAD ) Trek Fuel EX 7. The bike just blows away my previous 2010 Spesh Enduro Comp Evo ( a 7000 bucks bike in 2010, not top of the line, but pretty close to it). Yeah I got RS 35 Gold and NX, also 2 piston Shimano brakes but suess what... I am keeping up with my 8-9k bucks firends bike just fine
Anyway my point is... if all I had was 2500 USD to get me a brand new, brand name, locally supported warranty bike and WAS IN STOCK I would more than happily buy this bike and ride the shit out of it for the next 3 - 4 years!!!
Also the relativism you're using doesn't change the relativism of the value compared to other brands. So smirking and saying such and such bike is just as capable as something or other bike... Is basically no different from smirking and saying 'i spent 2500 and got Fox & SLX while you spent 2650 and got SX and X-fusion'...
Not a zero sum game. Both concepts can exist. The bike is capable and worth upgrading with a solid frame... While ALSO being a shitty value proposition. And shouldn't be people's first choice. If you want a bike shop warranty, buy a Giant Trance (X).
False. No self-respecting tooth jockey would find themselves on anything non-turquoise. Stop trying to make S-Works as dentist bikes happen Palmer.
I mean this in a very positive way. It's very relatable and it contrasts with overproduced ultra-slick TV or other video.
He may be secretly alerting us to the secret robot take over based on Alicia and Levy's behavior...and well...Kaz is an alien so whatcha gonna do? @NotOutsideCEO has seemed quiet lately...hmmm.
"Take me to your leader?"
drriaria.wixsite.com/website
drriaria.wixsite.com/website
That's a bloody great idea and would make a great article/viewing. Henry Quinney did a job with a comparison article regarding rear tyres a while ago. Something similar with a budget cap would be very useful.
That said, curious to know how much better the Comp actually is - and I'd upgrade from NX to GX as soon as an excuse presented itself (chain needs cleaning), but not the cassette because hub stuff. And I mean, how much worse can the cassette be really be?
Shop guy shows him some bikes ...
"What, that thing isn't worth a dime over 3k, I want a better suspension, better brakes, better tires, better ..."
Only on a Pinkbike, where boys can play at being toddlers.
The SX components will be gone soon..,
I'm looking at one online now.
www.bike-components.de/de/FOCUS/JAM-6-9-29-Mountainbike-p82678
this is huge value
Casing toughness For Specialized tires is control - grid - grid trail - grid gravity an so on.
Even so, worth noting that the 64 HTA and heavier weight don’t diminish its climbing prowess.
The idea that a longer front end climbs worse needs to die.
The idea that anyone but a World Cup XC racer benefits a lot from a lighter bike also needs to die.
Bike fit, suspension setup, tire choice all matter waaaaay more. If you look at total riding weight (bike, rider, snacks, tools, clothing, water) 5 pounds (2kg) is a small percentage of total weight.
Put a powermeter on a bike and ride some repeatable laps at consistent wattage (but different weights) and you’ll be disappointed at how little your speed changes.