Field Test: 2022 Fezzari La Sal Peak - The Purple Trail Eater

Aug 24, 2022
by Alicia Leggett  

PINKBIKE FIELD TEST

Fezzari La Sal Peak



Words by Alicia Leggett; photography by Dave Trumpore

Up next in our Enduro Bike Field Test is this purple trail eater, the Fezzari La Sal Peak. The La Sal Peak, released this spring, has been fully redesigned from the previous edition with new kinematics and a new look. Back when it was released, I took it for a spin and was impressed by the way the bike stayed calm and collected through rough desert terrain, both uphill and down, and the dramatically improved aesthetics are what I think the kids these days call a "glow up."

The bike has a flip chip that adjusts the head angle by 0.7º and changes the bottom bracket height by 7.5 mm. Fezzari won't exactly tell you how to play it, but the brand does recommend using the flip chip in its steeper setting to accommodate a smaller rear wheel, should you choose to run mixed wheel sizes.
La Sal Peak Details

• Travel: 170 mm rear / 170 mm fork
• Carbon frame
• Wheel size: 29" but compatible mixed
• 64.0º - 64.7º head angle
• 77.5º-78.8º seat tube angle
• 437mm chainstays
• Sizes: S, M, L (tested), XL
• Weight: 34.9 lb / 15.8 kg
• Price: $8,200 USD as tested, $3,200 - $8,499+ USD
fezzari.com

As for suspension, the bike comes with 170 mm of travel front and rear as a default, but Fezzari says the bike will work with up single crown and dual crown forks up to 203 mm, so it's possible to set it up as a dedicated bike park sled. Other details include clearance for a 2.6" rear tire, UDH compatibility, tube-in-tube internal routing, ample frame protection, space for a large water bottle on all frame sizes, and ISCG-05 tabs. Fezzari has also varied the frame design throughout the size range, which is meant to maintain the same feel on all the sizes. (I've only ridden a size L, but the frames do look different at each size, and the seat tube angle varies throughout the range to keep the effective seat tube angle consistent.)

photo

The most unique thing about the Utah direct-to-consumer brand is the degree of customization available. When purchasing a bike, customers are taken through a many-step process with selections for base build, wheels, suspension, dropper posts, plus add-ons like CushCore, chain guides, clear frame protection, and tools. Next, customers enter a comprehensive set of body measurements and riding preferences for what Fezzari calls its 23-Point Custom Setup, which includes both component sizing and setup. The brand relies heavily on its customer support reputation, and also offers a 20-day "Love It Or Return It" trial period and a limited lifetime warranty on all its products.

The exact build we tested isn't available at the moment thanks to supply chain issues, but when we mixed and matched our way to something similar using the online tool our bike came out to $8,200 USD.

So with a makeover and some compelling selling points, how did the purple Fezzi stack up against its competition?



photo
photo

Climbing

The Fezzari La Sal Peak is the most trail bike-y of the Field Tested bunch, with its relatively low weight and responsive feel, which translated into agreeable climbing behavior. While grinding uphill, the Fezzari sits the rider in a comfortable, forward position, its steep seat tube angle and 485 mm reach putting the rider somewhat forward on the bike without feeling too stretched out: a comfortable medium for grinding up techy bits and fire roads alike.

The bike's suspension setup translated to lots of traction on the climbs, and the long-on-paper 1264.8 mm wheelbase rode a little shorter than the numbers suggest, so the bike still felt easy to maneuver around tough switchbacks. Unlike some of the longer, more stable bikes, it wasn't so much a set-it-and-forget-it climber as it was one that was happy to navigate where it was told, but it didn't seem to carry momentum over obstacles quite as easily as bikes like the Commencal or the Contra.

The Fezzari would shine on purpose-built climbing trails, where swinging around switchbacks is a big plus, on climbs that feature lots of little roots to spin up and over, and on rolling terrain where it feels reassuring to have a bike that'll switch to climbing mode at a moment's notice.

photo

photo
photo

Descending


The La Sal Peak is more a generalist than a specialist. While many modern bikes feel specifically designed for steep, rocky, rough terrain, I found the Fezzari to be slightly less comfortable in the gnar but applicable to a wider range of trails than most enduro bikes. It'll hop, it'll corner, and it'll point essentially wherever you want it to, but feels more apt to be pinballed in some of the rockier chutes than the bikes built to prioritize stability. As an all-arounder, I found it to be quite enjoyable to ride.

The overall feel of the bike is a little softer than some of the racier options, likely due to a very supple, light shock tune and a frame that could be manually flexed a little more easily than the rest of the bunch. Regardless, I felt comfortable pointing it down all kinds of terrain.

It's an extremely comfortable bike to ride, and there are no surprises. It felt great throughout the test on flowy singletrack, jumps trails, and tech sections that require precision and slow maneuvering. It's also comfortable at high speeds, but note that it doesn't have that edgy feel that makes me want to push harder. Instead, it feels comfortable.
Timed Testing


This timed lap was what I'll call "tech-flow." It was a tech trail that made sense in the way that it flowed, and it was easy to find fast lines and carry speed. It started relatively flat with some pedally sections, then dropped into steeper, choppier terrain, with a series of stair-step drops, a few root doubles, and some fast corners.

Don't forget that timing is just one of many ways to judge a bike, and a fast lap time is a.) subject to my own preferences and comfort on the bike and b.) doesn't always mean it's the best for everyone.


Alicia Leggett: "The Fezzari La Sal Peak was the slowest bike for me, which surprised me because I didn't actually feel like I was riding any slower. The best explanation I can come up with is that the bike's slightly softer feel didn't incentivize me to push into corners, pump aggressively, and carry speed the way I did on the "racier" bikes. Still, I found the Fezzari to be incredibly agreeable and is a solid option for those who don't prioritize all-out descending speed. For Kazimer, the Fezzari finished mid pack."

It's easy to be content and enjoy the ride while on the bike, and I think that's my biggest takeaway. It feels pleasant. The Fezzari could be a great option for a rider who wants a do-it-all bike for trail riding and bike park days alike.

photo


Pros

+ Excellent climber for having 170 mm of rear travel
+ Capable in a wide variety of terrain
+ Great parts kit at each price point
+ Extremely customizable

Cons

- More generalist than specialist - it's not quite as solid as other options on high speed, rough trails
- Generally "soft" feel





The 2022 Enduro Bike Field Test is presented by Rapha, POC, and Continental. Thanks for keeping us dressed, safe, and rolling rubber side down.




Author Info:
alicialeggett avatar

Member since Jun 19, 2015
743 articles

209 Comments
  • 88 0
 Long legged generalist-available with cheaper build kits.

Seems like a good bike for people who like to ride enduro trails but maybe not race enduro. Which is a lot of people (including me).
  • 17 1
 Exactly. There is an enduro race series on the trails a mile from my house. I ride the same trails all the time, but not with the speed or skill the real competitors do as well as pedaling some of the longer, equally rough but more up and down loops. This bike appeals to me for that usage (though I'm sure a really good rider could make it perfectly competitive).
  • 72 7
 Climbs well, feels light, compliant, comfortable...dadduro. Now dads have an additional option to the Ripmo.
  • 16 71
flag kjm27 (Aug 24, 2022 at 10:41) (Below Threshold)
 @jeremy3220: why the sarcasm pointed at dad’s? Is it edgy and cool to poke fun at them? Or do you have some daddy issues?
  • 25 2
 @kjm27: It's not sarcasm.
  • 21 1
 @kjm27: Eh, so I took the second to look at his profile. 39 years old. So more than likely a bit of self-effacing humor. Why not practice the charity principle before getting all snark? You can never lose that way, as I suspect you have here.
  • 8 0
 @jeremy3220: I got the feeling you were being self-effacing, unlike that guy. Hell, I can laugh at myself and just say Olduro. Especially when I smoke the 20 year olds... Big Grin
  • 36 0
 @jeremy3220: I'm looking for a bike that's more of a 50/50 dadcountry/dadduro blend tbh
  • 6 0
 @wyorider Which is the VAST MAJORITY of people. So I count this one as the winner so far.
  • 45 0
 @jeremy3220: As a Dad who owns a Ripmo, I feel seen.
  • 72 1
 @jeremy3220: Fezzari dadduro race series coming next season. White New Balance shoes and cargo shorts required. Timing bonuses for racing with kids ride shotgun/Mac ride seat.
  • 2 7
flag WasatchEnduro (Aug 24, 2022 at 12:26) (Below Threshold)
 @bkm303:

but with a motor for the dadbod
  • 3 0
 @bkm303: Ripley with Minions.
  • 21 0
 @Fezzari: Fezzari x New Balance SPD shoe collab?
  • 17 0
 I got the impression from the video that this bike has enduro-level travel, but might be better classified as an "all mountain" bike. For the record, I'm 100% okay with that. It's not a slight.
  • 42 1
 @bkm303: We tried, but they said all laces or all velcro, and couldn't compromise on just one upper velcro strap with lower laces to make it less lawn-mow and more dad-duro.
  • 6 0
 @Fezzari: glad to see you aren't getting hate on the branding with the bike!!
  • 5 0
 @Chuckolicious: too many dad jokes out there. Dadduro triggered me
  • 2 0
 @kjm27: Happens to the best of us! Smile
  • 1 1
 @Fezzari: f*cking hilarious
  • 2 0
 Lots of traction on the climbs usually translates to lots of movement in the rear and not very efficient, I guess as long as the seat tube is steep, that doesn’t matter, still a good climber?
  • 13 1
 What’s an enduro trail? Worst word. Enduro is a form a racing, not a trail or riding style. It’s just riding if you’re not racing. That’s all.
  • 2 0
 @Fezzari: winner gets Fezzaddy trophy
  • 1 0
 @Fezzari: That is not a bad idea actually =)
  • 5 0
 @Cmolway: as a fellow dad and Ripmo owner now is our time!!
  • 2 1
 This is pretty much all of us. Full-on enduro race bikes are real fast, but they are not a lot of fun on the daily unless you are hitting warp 9 every ride.
  • 2 0
 @5afety3rd: all the trails I ride are daduro specific
  • 2 2
 The review makes the bike sound like my current bike. Basically a long travel trail bike. Which is exactly what I want. Though, in my case, I am still happy with my bike, so I guess I am not the target here.

Also, I am middle aged but not (and never will be) a dad. So, I guess I will sit out that race.

@5afety3rd: The name of my bike is "Enduro", so, I don't know what to do since I don't race enduro.
  • 90 6
 We're all just here waiting for the Contra review
  • 13 0
 Definitely the last review to drop
  • 6 0
 100%
  • 3 0
 @haen: you know it
  • 2 0
 it does win the comp
  • 2 0
 I am waiting for the contra and the intense.
  • 59 1
 If it was more specialist than generalist, this would surely be a con as well.
  • 46 4
 Sure seems like they were searching for cons. People can whine about the fonts and graphic design and shit all they want, Fezzari seems to put together some solid value bikes.
  • 37 2
 @Kabrex, not necessarily. If it was a trail bike, yes, but with a 170mm bike the expectation is typically that its specialty will be going downhill. The Fezzari's certainly capable in that regard, it just doesn't have the straightline speed / smash-through-everything nature of some of the other bikes on test.

For some riders that's going to be exactly what they want, while others might want a bike with a bigger appetite for the gnarly stuff.
  • 47 2
 @mikekazimer: While I understand OPs comment, I wonder if it would be a good idea to start including a neutral opinion tab. As you mentioned, its not a negative to some as it may be exactly what some want. As a business owner if my product had a listed negative like this, it would bother me, just because your opinions do carry so much weight. Just a thought.
  • 8 0
 @mikekazimer: I understand that you understand the sentiment behind the words, but clarity beats pithy every time. Downhill is a pretty broad specialty — as you say, some bikes have a charger feel, others like to pop and slide.
  • 5 0
 @chillrider199: Enduro races have been getting super gnarly. This bike probably isn’t the one to grab if you want to race gnarly enduros more often then not. Con for some, not for others. Not a knock on the product, but it’s certainly a valid con for some.
  • 16 1
 @mikekazimer: I wonder if for characteristics like "generalist", perhaps just having a bullet point or two about the bike's character and best application outside of the pro/con list would be better. Like, obviously if fezzari was marketing this like a purebred race bike, then "its a little slow and not racy" is totally fair game for the cons category, but it doesn't seem fair in this case. These characteristics and suitability opinions from reviewers are really great to have, but they'd be more valuable presented neutrally. For example:

Application: jack of all trades, master of none
Style: rough tracks, not races
Stiffness: soft
Pros: great climber, good spec for price
Cons: too soft generally

Just a thought
  • 38 0
 For sure, there are other ways that we could format these reviews, and things could change in the future. No matter how it's presented, though, the goal is for the combination of videos, written articles, and pros and cons lists to leave the reader with a good understanding of how the bike performs, short of taking it for a test ride themselves. And we're all happy to answer specific questions that pop up in the comments too.
  • 20 3
 @thechunderdownunder: I own this bike and like it a lot, but I like pretty much all of my bikes after some set up time. Interestingly, if you compare this bike to the Yeti SB150, one of my former favorite bikes and the most flexy rear end I've ever owned, the yeti is steeper, shorter, shorter chainstay, and has less travel. Very very similar though in geo. I'd say they ride quite similarly having owned both. And yet the Yeti does have a more 'racey' vibe as far as suspension feel goes in my memory. It's been a couple of years since my 150, but I guess one thing that is really interesting is that bikes have changed a lot, but lots of folks are winning races on 'old' geo compared to most of the ones on test. Living in Bellingham, there's such a focus on slack, low, and cutting edge. I've kind of landed on more all rounder bikes these days for optimal fun, as I'm pretty fast, but don't race, stopped clipping in, and just want to have a good time. I think it's important to consider that I believe anyone that races on this bike would do as well as any other bike. They have a killer JR. race team and it's working for them. That said, I'd happily ride pretty much any modern bike and I think most people would. For me it's a great bike at a killer value. But you make a good point about what are your priorities. I do think that it's a generalization that this bike or a bike like it may not make a good race bike though.
  • 3 0
 @mikekazimer: I get you. It doesn't have rock-crushyness.
  • 11 13
 I think the point is that nobody needs a 170 mm trail bike. At this travel bracket it better be really good at smashing through stuff otherwise what's the point? Might as well be riding a 140-150 bike.
  • 1 0
 @mikekazimer: What is your favorite bike so far?
  • 5 1
 @salespunk: maybe in Carlsbad they dont
  • 7 0
 @salespunk: they have said that it's not as good at smashing straight lines through the rough stuff compared to the other 170mmish bikes on test here. I imagine it would still handle it better than most 140-150mm bikes.
  • 3 0
 @andrewfif: I also owned the Sb150 when it first came out, and back when I liked to race. It was pretty extreme geo at the time. I probably set most of my PRs on that bike. Even though it climbed Yeti good, it was really boring to ride on mellow trials from what I remember, and that could be a con for many.

That’s where this bike could be better option for many people who want a long travel bike that’s not too much bike to make the everyday rides dull.
Certainly isn’t a knock on the product to say that it’s not the ideal enduro race bike.

For me, even though I don’t particularly like Santa Cruz Bicycles as a company, the 22 Bronson is the Shit!!
  • 1 6
flag nickfranko (Aug 24, 2022 at 15:16) (Below Threshold)
 @thisc*nt: I would be pretty depressed to have 170mm of travel and it not do as well through the rough as I would expect of an enduro (which is the implication here of it falling short of the others). Why am I carrying around the extra weight of 30-40mm more travel if it’s not doing exactly what I want it to do: soak up the rough?
  • 1 0
 @thechunderdownunder: I'm with you. That bike was at the sharp edge at the time, but would be considered quite tame now. And yet I did some of my best riding on it and loved it.

I guess what I'm saying is that the Yeti still is considered an ideal race bike. I actually liked it as an all-rounder too though. So maybe more what I'm saying is....it's hard to say what an 'ideal' race bike is.

But I'm 100 on board with you that it's not a knock. And most folks would be served very very well with a bike like this. I've also never had a SC, but stoked you're digging the Bronson. I demoed a previous version and had a blast. Someday I'll try one out Smile
  • 1 0
 @mikekazimer: usually when bikes that don't have that straight-through-everything nature, it's because they're poppy and and more agile.
This one is apparently overly soft yet still can't straight line. What do you think the issue is?
  • 1 0
 @mikekazimer, would a shock with a "firmer" tune make the La Sal Peak feel "racier"?
  • 4 0
 @nickfranko: I think the implication is that it would soak up the rough more than the 130-140 bikes, but not as much as some of the other 170mm bikes on test here. It was Kaz's midpoint bike in terms of laptime, so it wasn't exactly slow in his hands compared to others.
  • 3 1
 @nickfranko: so don't buy this bike. The whole point of this comparison is to give potential buyers this sort of information.
  • 1 0
 @mikekazimer: cream or jam first on a scone?
  • 1 0
 @mikekazimer: How would this bike ride on trails like DD/DB, Brown Pow, etc. for a semi-slow and sort of older rider?
  • 40 2
 if you're going to talk about frame stiffness, you better start measuring with instruments. There's no way that you can properly discern this characteristic when components and other factors can have a significant effect on the outcome and the information you share. I'm not saying you need to get all German Bike Action on the readers and provide radar charts, but maybe I am. The bike world is filled with anecdotes, conjecture, biases, and lack of statistical data, and we need less of that crap.
  • 6 0
 Ever put your crank in the lowest position, stand at the side, and then flex the bottom bracket area by pressing on the pedal? They flex a ton! More than I ever expected, and you can see and feel the differences between brands and bike categories.
  • 3 0
 It’s weird that the Santa Cruz was “too Stiff” and the Fezzari is “too soft” — and those are basically the only negatives for the bikes.
  • 7 4
 @kperras THIS! So over the voodoo and woo woo bullshit. This ain’t 1987 anymore.
  • 2 1
 @kperras You know, this made me think of something. Would love someone at PB to chime in, but not holding my breath. Suspension setup. How do they setup each bike for each rider? I am going out on a limb and say: not with a really pro bit of telemetry kit. Something like the BYB, there are several high end kits around now. ShockWiz is kinda lame, I know, I have one.

Take the time to dial in each rider to each bike using a system like this. That way, you establish something of a consistent baseline. System says bike is best it can be for rider X. Then they go on their test rides.

Honestly, anything short of this renders all these tests nonsense. Each rider has their own meat brain set of feels that they sort of apply on the fly to sort of think they have the bike set up properly in the limited time they have. When the general consensus is it takes a couple weeks of riding to properly dial in a bike.

One day, I said it here first, there will be a bot that rides bikes. With this you can empirically test virtually any aspect of a bike under perfectly replicable scenarios. But until then, it is incumbent upon PB/Outside to utilize the tools available now. IMO, of course.
  • 42 9
 Wake me up when the Contra & Patrol Carbon reviews drop. In the meantime, please tell Outside+ that no nonprofit needs a Land Rover. If they say they do, they deserve to be investigated for misappropriation of funds.
  • 7 5
 They’re called non-profits because they spend all that money on unnecessary stuff. You think it’s because the money actually goes to charity? Omaze laughs at that notion.
  • 33 0
 I’m waiting for Alicia’s imminent grip shootout.
  • 10 2
 I'm waiting for Alicia's every review,ver writing (and riding!) are top notch.
  • 3 0
 Waiting to hear if anything is better than the Ergon GE1s I have on now. Things are magic for me and make me want to try riding bare handed.
  • 2 0
 LOL I was thinking the same thing.
  • 2 1
 @sjma: I hear the Santa Cruz grips are where it’s at.
  • 24 1
 This bike did win the mens EWS100 last weekend at Sugarloaf and was 6th the week before at Burke. It’s got some race chops. Great review!
  • 17 3
 Results from the EWS 100 Sugarloaf for Robert Brown Racking on the La Sal:
Rob's Time: 27:28.46 (Good enough for 11th place in the ESW Pro race 1.7 seconds behind Sam Hill in 10th)
Source: admin.enduroworldseries.com/uploads/documents/races/1661028238.pdf


Source for the EWS Pro race Sugarloaf results for comparison:
admin.enduroworldseries.com/uploads/documents/races/1661114622.pdf

The La Sal is FAST!
  • 6 1
 @cyclebiker0-0: EWS 100 results does not show that they raced Stage 1. So, that total time is missing a ~3:30 stage...
  • 28 16
 This may be controversial, but no matter how good this bike rides, I could never buy it and feel happy about it because of the looks alone. The amount of times I stand back and look at my bike in admiration, if I had this thing, I'd be looking at it in disappointment every time... but like I said, looks are subjective.
  • 5 3
 Honestly, manufactures who make bikes with the extra seat tube braces and rounded corners need to understand that 50% of what people consider when they buy a bike is looks.
  • 10 0
 I agree with you on having to at least like the look of my bike. Nothing like going into the garage just to stare haha. I don't see this bike as that bad, I kind of like it. Ibis bikes have always looked kinda odd to me though.
  • 7 2
 Unsure why the downvotes, but concur that it's hard on the eyes. I could be swayed if cheap, but that isn't weighing in the equation for the foreseeable future.
  • 2 1
 Out of curiosity, what about the design do you not like? I like the look of the front triangle starting out rounded and seeing it transition to something more angular in the rear.

Not trying to argue, genuinely curious!
  • 3 3
 I think it’s a good looking bike. The only thing I dislike is the massive rear cassette. But that most bikes these days.
  • 3 2
 Not controversial to think that on a bike with that kind of price tag at all.

Should be in the "cons" section IMO. It mings hard.
  • 4 1
 @Ajorda: I think the thing that kills it for me is ultimately the big sweep in the top tube. Bikes with straight uninterrupted lines, especially the top tube, always look super tough. I am also usually a sucker for clean and simple. The Commencal and Patrol in this group are some of my favorite looking bikes, honestly and the SC, Claymore, and Intense although the intense paintjob is... intense. The Fezzari just looks like a shape of something I'd see sitting on the top shelf at walmart. The curvy top tube with the weird swoopey rocker link then combined with a rather straight seat stay... it just doesn't work for me. My eyes get distracted by all the weird little curves rather than seeing the bike shape as a whole. It just doesnt look like it was meant to go together. But anyways, I could go on. At the end of the day, looks arent everything, but they aren't nothing. Bc I love the way the Commencal SX looks, it also just makes it more fun to ride and own.
  • 2 0
 you said EXACTLY what I was thinking! How the bike looks is crucial for me (yeah, you can crucify me! hahaha).
  • 3 0
 @misteraustin: got the point: the curves and the link remembers a Walmart bike.
  • 4 1
 @Ajorda: It looks clumpy and dated to me. The pieces of the frame don’t flow together well, and too much empty space overall in front and rear triangles. And the color although that’s completely subjective.
  • 3 0
 @Ajorda: Also the seatatay has a defined edge profile and the rest of the bike looks goopy and rounded yet still triangular in basic shape.
  • 17 3
 Complain about the company name, engage!
  • 15 10
 Still better than the name Intense
  • 11 5
 Yup. They kind of immediately made themselves the Hundai/Kia of the bike world with a name like that and budget frame D2C go-to-market strategy. No matter how well they design and spec their bikes, their name and initial brand image will continue to hold them back.
  • 10 2
 @pgomez: So if they changed their name to Yeti and charged $5000 for a frame, they'd have brand clout?
  • 7 0
 @BigShralp: or....Haibike
  • 7 2
 they should change their name to Binotto and then have clown paint schemes
  • 6 0
 @Ironchefjon: Yeti has their own brand image issues (the dentist tribe). Hopefully they fix the fact that you can't run anything bigger than a 2.3 in their enduro bike's rear triangle soon.

A better comparison would be Forbidden. They're a relatively new brand as well, and they've positioned themselves in a much better way from the get-go.
  • 11 1
 You know it’s a solid bike when “versatility” is mentioned as one of few cons
I’ve spent time on this bike with the fox setup and Rock Shox (Zeb and SuperD) and I prefer the latter. Super fun bike and versatile to be your daily driver but still hold up on the chunk. Starting price of $4k is pretty sick too.
  • 14 1
 Grape things are left to come.
  • 12 3
 Great review! Sounds like it handles the ups and downs of the trail very well.

The real question is how does it handle the emotional ups and downs of waiting for @brianpark to let us bag-holding Beta subscribers how we're going to be made whole?
  • 11 0
 For the hoi polloi, like 99% of us here, this sounds like the winner so far.
  • 2 0
 mmmm nope
  • 2 1
 Unfortunately, it is ugly and the colour choice couldn't be worse... btw, these could be put in the "cons" list.
  • 1 1
 @emptybe-er: Why not? I bet if you took this for a day trip to Alsea you'd have a blast!
  • 2 1
 @rafaelgaede: Eh, I'm a function over form kinda guy, and these colors aren't really all that bad.
  • 1 1
 @rafaelgaede: I actually really like purple bikes, so colors are a pro for me.
  • 1 0
 @rafaelgaede: It comes in gray too.
  • 7 0
 I think it's also important to mention there is nothing wrong with a generalist Enduro bike. I myself prefer a Enduro bike thats good at alot of things. I have had sleds I the past and they are great, but I don't ride enough steep straight terrain enough to justify having a complete sled.
  • 4 1
 Totes Magotes
  • 1 0
 As with so many other things in the biking world, it will come down to the skill of the rider.
  • 8 0
 Both them "cons" seem perfect. Generalists means does it all and is good all arounder. And soft is exactly what I want. Modern stiff bikes feel like crap.
  • 7 0
 I'm really disapointed that we don't see anti-squat and leverage ratio graphs anymore. I really like to digest that information in conjunction with riders perspective.
  • 3 0
 Agreed. Lots of emotion and phrasemongering, but literally no facts for the reader to put the prose in a technical context. Suspension graphs, concrete tuning settings of the suspension, tire pressures, setting for the contact points such as number of spacers and position of the saddle, etc...you name it. But maybe that's just me with such expectations.
  • 7 3
 I was so optimistic about this bike in the first minute of the video — 27.5 rear wheel compatible, dual crown compatible… at last, something to set the bike apart from the rest and get excited about. Then the details unfolded, and it turned out to be just another “middle of the pack” bike, like the two before it. What will it take to get these guys excited about a bike?
  • 12 1
 Carbon Patrol
  • 7 0
 I have a suspicion that the Deviate Claymore will be an exciting contender. Seems to offer a lot of what they liked about the Norco range...but without weighing 40 pounds.
  • 3 0
 @KJP1230: the naming sure doesn't seem seems to suggest a middle of the road generalist bike
  • 8 1
 Totally agree. They seem so bored by the bikes. All I’ve got from the last 3 videos is ‘the bike is good at some stuff’

Have an opinion guys come on!
  • 3 0
 @tbc: Maybe they're all good and about the same - IE nothing is standing out.
  • 8 0
 @tbc: I think this is the function of two key factors:
1. Most bikes, in terms of performance, are within 1-2% of most other bikes in a given category; lots of manufacturers are making solid rigs.
2. Some of the more 'meh' reviews are likely to drop earlier in the order - save the good stuff for later in the field test release cycle.
  • 4 9
flag somebody-else FL (Aug 24, 2022 at 17:41) (Below Threshold)
 @tbc: the Commencal is a porky tank, the Megatower sucks as much as the last one did, and this one is from a joker named brand that made a decent fat bike a couple years ago. If they shit all over the bikes they didn’t like they would never get more bikes to review.
  • 4 0
 I think most of us know that how a bike rides cannot easily be summed up by looking at the numbers on paper. It’s common to read reviews that describe a bike as ‘feeling’ shorter or longer than the quoted wheelbase, this can be the result of many factors, but I am curious how often the reviewers pull out a tape measure to confirm wheelbase and other dimensions. I’ve always measured all of my bikes when I get them and in many cases the numbers differ wildly from the spec sheet. Case in point my new large patrol has a 1285 wheelbase, Geo chart lists 1268mm.
  • 7 0
 What does is soft feel mean? Is it not a suspension attribute? is it not possible to tune the suspension firmer?
  • 1 0
 As @svenjamsa said below, suspension can vary the stiffness. The Rockshox setup feels very different compared to the Fox due to the tune differences.
  • 4 1
 The "general bike" characteristic is a huge selling point. The Delano Peak fits the same ideology, and that's why I love it more than any other bike I've tried. It's instantly familiar, comfortable, works absolutely everywhere, it's best described as "friendly." It's the bike for the people. Fezzari are absolutely killing it lately.
  • 5 0
 Seems like a perfect candidate for a -1* headset to make it more "downhill focused"
  • 8 0
 I've got one and have a -1 in my house right now. And a broken leg. I'll have to try it at some point.
  • 8 2
 No headset routing, no dice.
  • 8 3
 Fezzari is probably the best value going for the direct to consumer brands. Amazing builds for the price.
  • 2 0
 I just picked up a Orbea Rallon, similar numbers on the geo, but is about 2 lbs lighter. Most of the bikes are now in the 35lbs range which starts to feel pretty heavy in my opinion. 31lbs - 32lbs is noticeably lighter than the bikes in the test and would have been interesting to has something like this compared to this current crop of Enduro bikes.
  • 1 0
 yyy . . . . . .
  • 1 0
 Dadduro comments aside that have me bent over laughing, I must comment on this bike's absolute versatility. I've been riding and racing a small La Sal x DVO since May. In fact, I finished by build the day before our season's first race...then won said race. Since then, I more or less have ditched my 140mm trail bike as the La Sal is more comfortable down, but equally good going up. Bike park to big pedal days, it does it all. In fact, I'm just home from a Whistler trip where the same bike enjoyed Lord of the Squirrels, Blackcomb pedals and Whistler laps. When riding at home in Tahoe steep chunk, I throw on a 27.5" rear wheel for a little more dh prowess.

What's covered but not driven home in the article is how FANTASTIC this bike is for a smaller rider. I'm 5'2" and I'm running 180mm dropper, fitting a full size bottle, enjoying size-specific geo, and that slight flex that's mentioned - I'll go ahead and say that it's the perfect amount of compliance for an aggressive lighter rider.
  • 4 0
 I'd love to see a comparison between this and the Propane Tyee some day. Both seem like trail-friendly enduro bikes.
  • 5 1
 The tyee has shorter reach and longer chainstays, so probably a lot better balanced in the L and XL than the LaSal. I have an XL tyee and can’t go back to short chainstays now.
  • 1 1
 @crustin: Thanks! I'd be on an XL too, so I was wondering if the feelings they had in the review would be more acute.

The advantages for the La Sal for me is that I'm not THAT far away from Fezzari's headquarters and they have a good rep for customer service. And as mentioned the short rear end is good for switchbacks. Plus I have had really good experiences with DVO suspension, which they spec on their base model.

For the Propain, it's the sportier pedaling feel - as I'll use it as a very heavy duty trail bike, the possible better balance in larger sizes due to the chainstays, and the GX vs NX drivetrain. I don't like that they spec a non-piggyback Rockshox deluxe on the base model, though, as it seems an odd choice for this type of bike (particularly as I'm not small and ride where it's often very hot).

I really should get out to Moab for Outer bike and test ride both, but it might be just a bit too far.
  • 1 0
 @crustin: Also, how tall are you? I imagine I'd want an XL on in the Propain, but at ~190cm, I'm 2cm above the floor for the XL and 2 cm below the ceiling for the large.
  • 2 1
 @MarcusBrody: I’m 193cm and feel the XL is on the shirt side for me. I’d definitely go with an XL if I were you.

I put a dvo jade x coil on mine and it feels way better than the rs super deuce that came on it. It’s a bike that just works better with a coil. But you should try the la sal. Some people like those short chain stays. I know as a tall dude I really prefer the longer back end and the bike being balanced.
  • 1 1
 @crustin: I've read that the coil is the way to go. One of the reasons I was interested in the La Sal was that I really like my current DVO shock and the base model comes with DVO suspension, so a Jade on the Tyee also sounds good!
  • 1 0
 I’d rather see it compared to the Propain Spindrift and Canyon Torque. All three are long-travel sleds with freeride intentions and all three are dual crown compatible. You could throw a Transition Spire into the mix aswell, for good measure.
  • 1 0
 @Muscovir: I'd certainly read that comparison, especially if they tossed a 200m dual crown fork on the La Sal, but I didnt get the feeling they were natural competitors. The review described the La Sal as on the trail side of Enduro whereas those are basically pedalable park bikes.
  • 3 0
 Thoughts on the TRP brakes here? Also which model?

I am a big fan of my new dhr evos... Seeking confirmation of my choice haha
  • 1 0
 They are the best.
  • 2 1
 So versatility is a con now, is it.

And what about the other complaint? Supple suspension because of a light shock tune is a con? The damper on that shock has dials for a reason.

Also that anecdote about frame stiffness. Is that solely based on your impression or on a measurement? Without any context or point of reference, saying the bike isn't as "solid as other options" is about as useful as talking about the weather. Could you even say what you felt was purely down to the frame? Those wheels are known to have quite a lot of flex. IIRC their big selling point is that they are designed to be compliant. Did you take that into consideration? And what is a "general soft feel" even supposed to be? A sofa cushion can feel soft, but a bike? Like, please use your words...

Sorry for being negative, but the review is honestly a bit lackluster.
  • 1 0
 “..this bike would be great for purpose built hiking trails..” so I think versatility was a nicer way of saying it doesn’t do anything particularly well (or particularly bad)
  • 4 0
 85$ for Tubeless....................
  • 6 3
 It's a looker and a big travel bike that feels like a trail bike is no bad thing.
  • 2 0
 @mikekazimer: @alicialeggett: I maybe have missed it, but what flipchip position did you end up using during the test?
  • 6 0
 The low one, which is the default for 29" wheels. Fezzari doesn't come right out and say it, but the high flip chip position seems to be specifically to correct for a 27.5" rear wheel.
  • 3 1
 I would love to see all of these bikes compared to the specialized enduro as a benchmark from that review a few years ago
  • 2 0
 i think they address this in the future round table
  • 2 0
 Im here to see a design Yeti has been sitting on for a few years and gets slid in at the end.....
  • 2 0
 Does seem like the SB150 and 130 are getting very long in the tooth - essentially a mid-2018 design. I believe I saw a new Yeti in testing a few months ago here in Colorado. I cannot be sure, as the yeti folks were descending past me on a climb, but I am reasonably confident that I saw a new suspension platform and a charcoal grey colorway that is not a current production color...
  • 2 0
 So the seat angle can be adjusted my 1.3deg but the head angle only by 0.7deg...? I spy a typo!
  • 10 0
 ...and a typo in my own comment calling out a typo. Brilliant.
  • 4 1
 The Fezzari team is Fast AF on the DVO sus with the La Sal.
  • 3 0
 Direct sales brands reaching U$$ 8.500... yeah, the end is near!
  • 2 0
 Sounds a lot like my RM Altitude. Excellent "big bike" all rounder
  • 13 15
 I own two Fezzaris - the previous generation La Sal and the Delano. The biggest selling point for me with both frames is the ability to carry two bottles inside the main triangle and a third underneath the downtube. I don't love the high top tube of my La Sal and had considered upgrading when rumors of a new model started floating around. But now it looks like you'll have to pry both frames from my cold, dead hands. I drink a LOT of water and can't imagine going back to wearing a pack.
  • 27 3
 Jeezus, water bottle mounts was the biggest selling point? That's not exactly huge praise...
  • 6 3
 @bishopsmike: don't knock it til you try it :-) I'd hate to give up the two bottle mounts in my frame (it's not a Fezzari, I have no dog in this fight). There's really not that much to differentiate bikes these days, especially if you're building from the frame up. Geometry is similar and so much of a bike's personality is from wheels and suspension, so even the small differences magazine editors mention in complete builds aren't always obvious (ie not 100% due to the frame construction and rear suspension design).
  • 6 0
 FWIW, I tried to switch from a hydro pack to water bottles, but hated either reaching down and grabbing one while attempting to ride or stopping to grab a drink. I grabbed a Dakine hip-pack, which comfortably holds 2L + a few pads and my phone, and is way more comfortable than a back pack, while also allowing me to quickly grab a drink while climbing.

Might be worth a try for at hydro homie Smile
  • 6 1
 @bishopsmike: In line with jdejace's point, this was more about me being realistic about what I can and cannot feel between different bikes. I don't review bikes for a living and we haven't been able to do real test rides for years because of the 'rona. So I'm not sure I would be able to tell much difference between the ride qualities of any two decent bikes with similar geometry. But I sure as hell can tell the difference between one bottle and three bottles when I'm two hours into a ride on a 95 degrees day!
  • 2 0
 @bishopsmike: but it's THREE water bottles! How isn't this mentioned as a plus?!
  • 1 0
 Consider bib shorts with cargo pockets on the back(ketl mountain is really good). I use a 27 oz collapsible water pouch for longer rides that I bought at Northstar one day. Definitely a game changer.
  • 1 0
 @enurjetik: I'm just bugging you - I agree there are lots of REALLY nice bikes these days, so sometimes you just need one major difference to help make your choice.
  • 2 1
 The bikes softer feel - So did you just set suspension to a specific sag or did you take the time to tune it in.
  • 4 0
 I have this bike with a Zebb uand super deluxe (both ultimate) and that makes it a bit more stiff and poppy than the X2 setup that I had on it. The Rock Shox option in the checkout process on their website is they way to go imo. I’ve spent considerable time on both and it’s just better with RS.
  • 1 1
 So while climbing it is the most trail bike-y of the Field and while descending it's a bit soft while it has just enough support for those small and mid sized hits
  • 1 0
 Is the parts value REALLY that good? That's a ton of money for GX, even if it is the AXS version.
  • 3 0
 It's the lower-end builds where you'll find the value, I think. Base model is $4k with nice DVO suspension. The big winner for me would be the $5k model with Zeb/Super Deluxe Ultimate, GX, and good alloy wheels (Stans Flow MK4).
  • 2 0
 It’s just a GX AXS derailleur and shifter. The cassette is the nicer, and 200g lighter X0 version. Plus Crank brothers carbon wheels/i9 hubs and top shelf fox suspension.
  • 1 0
 Guys, you need to pick a different song, it sounds like a the end they sing "F#ck you".
  • 1 0
 I live in santa cruz (home of ibis) and can confirm 99% of ibis riders here are dads
  • 3 3
 Is outside back in the mix? What are the criterias for outside articles? This seems like random nobike article
  • 3 5
 If the pb featherweight testers say it's not the stiffest frame... Probably not the bike for my fat ass. Bummer, I was sorta hoping this bike would trounce some of the overpriced competition.
  • 3 0
 I can't say that I agree with that assessment. I'm 230 lbs and ride the same trails in Bellingham and at Whistler a lot. I've got carbon wheels, so there's that, but I'm really happy with mine.
  • 2 0
 I’m around 250 lbs and ride heavy on my suspension, the frame has some flex, but in the right ways. I put a lot of time on it at parks but also will take it for pretty long pedal days and haven’t really ever felt like it was wallowing underneath me. Anecdotal sure, but from one big guy to another it feels solid underneath!
  • 2 0
 I'm also another 250# rider. I've got the new La Sal Peak with the Elite build; which has the RockShox Zeb Ultimate fork and their Ultimate Deluxe rear shock. The bike doesn't feel soft or flexy anywhere to me. I'm really impressed with the way it climbs considering it has 50mm more travel than my trail bike, yet it seems just as responsive. Landing jumps and drops feels like touching down on a cloud compared to my shorter travel bikes too. Can't wait to get it to some bike parks to hit stuff bigger and faster.
You have to remember with these pro reviews that the testers are spoiled by riding the very best equipment from all brands and expected to try to make them sound as unique as possible even though they are all designed around the same intended usage with similar geometry. They're like movie reviewers who are jaded and can't seem to say anything positive about an entertaining flick unless it's Oscar award worthy.
  • 1 0
 That frame looks kinda flexy in the slomo shots.
  • 1 0
 Does UDH compatable also mean UDH only?
  • 1 0
 It appears to mean that the manufacturer has used there own hanger for some reason but it is the same as the UDH, and therefore interchangeable.
  • 5 7
 Sooo it’s Carbon, weighs the same as my Orange DH and costs way more, I thought things we’re supposed to be evolving.
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv56 0.052590
Mobile Version of Website