PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Santa Cruz Megatower
Words by Alicia Leggett; photography by Dave TrumporeIt feels like just recently that 150mm of rear travel seemed like plenty for an enduro bike, but the times have changed, and as the definition of an enduro bike has become brawnier, Santa Cruz's long-travel 29er has grown to reflect that shift.
The second iteration of the Megatower - the biggest of the 'Towers - brings 165mm of rear suspension to the table, paired with a 170mm fork and with the new addition of in-frame storage to make it even more enduro-ready. It's gained 5mm of travel compared to the Megatower V1, and even more notably has slackened out by more than a degree up front.
Megatower Details• Travel: 165mm rear / 170mm fork
• Carbon frame
• Wheel size: 29"
• 63.5º - 63.8º head angle
• 77.5º-77.8º seat tube angle
• 441mm chainstays
• Sizes: S, M, L, XL, XXL
• Weight: 15.42 kg / 34.00 lb
• Price: $5,649 - $13,999 USD
•
santacruzbicycles.com This new version uses the same VPP suspension platform as its predecessor, with just a few tweaks including a slightly lower leverage ratio, and there's an option to swap out the stock 62.5mm stroke length shock for a 65mm one, bumping the travel up to 170mm.
Santa Cruz has chosen to ditch the chainstay length adjustment chip for size-specific chainstay lengths - our size L test bike had 441mm chainstays. Still, the Megatower keeps its other geo adjustment flip chip, which changes the head angle by a paltry 0.3mm between 63.5º and 63.8º, changes the bottom bracket height by 3.5mm, and makes the leverage a bit more progressive in the low option.
Available in a total of 11 build options, the Megatower pricing starts at $5,649 for a base model in the C (as opposed to the fancier and slightly lighter CC) carbon, and skyrockets all the way up to $13,999 USD for the Flight Attendent, CC, all the bells and whistles build. All the build kits all come with SRAM drivetrains and brakes, so Shimano fans are out of luck, but there's an interesting mix of Fox and RockShox suspension, including mixed Fox 38 / RockShox Super Deluxe (both air and coil) options in the middle of the range.
The bike was designed with a 170mm fork in mind, but Santa Cruz gives its blessing to run 180mm up front if riders are inclined, but a dual crown fork is not advised. Each of the builds comes with ISCG-05 tabs and a full chainguide and bash guard setup, a Santa Cruz derailleur hanger (though the bike is UDH-compatible), internal routing, and frame protection on the downtube and drive-side chainstay.
Finally, we need to mention the Glovebox. That's Santa Cruz's new take on in-frame storage, and though this is the first go-around, the system works nicely. There's a spring-loaded latch that is reasonably easy to open and close, though it's a bit trickier with gloves on, and inside you'll find a "tool wallet" and a "tube purse." The purse is just a neoprene sleeve, while the wallet has some internal organization for tools, credit cards, and other small items.
ClimbingIf someone told me a few years ago that 165mm travel bikes would soon be climbing as well as they do today, I'd have trouble believing it. Still, long travel and all, the Megatower powers right up as well as you'd expect from any 34 lb (15.4 kg) bike. The well-supported suspension has enough sensitivity to keep traction over rocks and roots without bobbing much, and the bike as a whole has a nice, responsive feel.
Pitted against some of the other bikes in this Field Test, it clearly holds its own on the ups, proving that it's a very solid climber for the enduro bike category. Both the Commencal and Contra, while both are well-supported and offer very firm pedaling platforms, are heavier, longer, and less maneuverable than the Megatower, making them feel like much more bike to manage on the climbs. The Transition and the Fezzari are some of the better climbers of the bunch and are fairly well-matched against the Santa Cruz. The Transition has a smaller rear wheel, which doesn't have quite the same feeling of rolling and powering capability on the climbs as the Megatower's rear 29" one, but at 33.6 lbs, it's the lightest bike of the test. The Fezzari is the most "trail bike-y" of the group and climbs quite well for its 170mm of travel. It has a softer feel than the Megatower, which both helps and hurts it on the climbs: it doesn't feel like it has quite the same willingness to sprint and push as the Megatower, but it does maintain traction just a bit more easily than the Megatower.
In short, my take on the Megatower's climbing ability is that it has enough support and enough sensitivity to get the job done - I recently rode two back-to-back 6,000' (1829m) days on it, and at no point was I wishing for any other bike.
Descending
Despite having the shortest reach of any bike we tested, the Megatower is not exactly compact, with a 1266mm wheelbase and 441mm chainstays. To me, that moderate reach helped keep the bike from feeling strung out from the 63.5º head angle (in the low setting) and made it easy to feel on top of both the front and rear wheels at the same time, unlike some of the more boatlike bikes we tested. That's a double-edged sword, as the feeling of sitting in rather than over the bike can be nice, but the Megatower's riding position helped keep the handling feeling quick.
I found the Megatower to be a lot of fun, but there was one thing I couldn't quite sort out. It felt pretty harsh at times, despite the ultra-plush Fox suspension and dialed settings, which we attributed in part to the stiffness of the frame and wheels.
That's another give-and-take, as the bike felt aggressive enough that we all agreed that it had a chargey, easy-to-push feel, but the harshness on chattery sections made it a little more work to ride than some of the other bikes we tested. That said, heavier riders might find the stiffness to be perfect. Santa Cruz says it's introduced size-specific stiffness for this version of the bike, and the smaller sizes have more compliant frames.
One more characteristic that surprised me about the Megatower is that the rear end breaks free laterally more easily than any of the other bikes, despite having great braking traction in straight lines and over choppy terrain. I found that to be really fun, and it gives the bike a "slappy" feel in the corners, though it does detract from the bike's race-ready feel, in my opinion. Some of the bikes on test (like the Commencal) felt most at-home pointed down choppy descents in straight lines, while others (like the Transition) wanted to hop and play around. The Santa Cruz strikes a balance between those impulses, feeling playful but willing to stay on track when needed.
It all went away the second I got rid of the Reserve wheels and put Stans Alu rims on. Some may love them, and they do feel so fast and nimble, but nothing could make up for how difficult it was to stay on line in rough stuff with those carbon hoops.
As a huge BMW guy/owner I’m triggered. Lol
The difference is those 2014 Santa Cruz bikes are still going strong. There aren’t many other brands where the frames can take such a beating year on year.
If my Bronson was still worth 5k, I'd probably have a new bike
So, let's just go Lexus. Because have you seen the dashboard on the LX600? Looks like one from a $40-50k car.
Resale may not be great where you live, but it's pretty ridiculous where I live.
The used market is good. I’ve just found I don’t get as much of my money out of higher end builds than say gx/xt level builds.
The extra $3.5k went towards electric seats I guess, but I do have aluminum wheels…
"Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in your midst?"
@suspended-flesh:
Salty? Yes, towards how ridiculous the bike industry has become.
If you have ever ridden Blue Velvet, it might make more sense, especially in the last two years.
If you are ever up this way shoot me a D.M, happy to go for a rip with ya!
The thing that stands out to me was the exact same issues I had with my VPP bikes is what people mention now. Albeit to a lesser degree. In my experience the platform had a jittery back end, pedal kickback in the tech, yet wallowed at the mid-stroke. It was really tough for me to get dialed.
Glad to see them try something new with the Blur, even if it's just a flexy-stay single pivot.
1: I never implied that they didn't
2: It's certainly more about the rider at that level. Turner said "they could win races on frozen dog turds" or something like that.
3: The bikes at WC races are far from stock kinematics.
Carry on
I get the joke, it just wasn’t funny
Yet another reason why you need some bigger folks testing bikes and parts. What might be a con for smaller riders might be perfect for bigger riders.
I have years to weeks of ride time on these other bikes: Ibis Mojo XL, Ibis Mojo HD XL, original Bronson XL, Tracer 275 XL with Push ElevenSix, Jeffsy XXL with Push ElevenSix, Salsa Spearfish XL, Rocky Mountain Element XXL, Orbea Rise XL, Kona Process 153 XL.
I really didn't want to buy the Megatower bike because it was so expensive, but I had to because it was perfect for me: (1) 20-40mm higher stack height than my other XL and XXL bikes means I can get my bars close to saddle height;
(2) size-specific carbon layups increase the odds of it being stiff enough for me;
(3) size-specific chainstays increase the odds of being balanced when cornering;
(4) works with all stock shocks and has a threaded BB and well-sorted linkages so I can maintain it myself and swap shocks if I want to;
(5) Has nice in frame storage which means I can carry a bottle on my back and a bottle in the frame and ride for 2 hours.
(6) Didn't buy it for this, but I also really like that the water bottle cage is high and unobstructed so I can drink from it while I am climbing and not just on breaks.
I've been experimenting with suspension settings but have settled back on the exact suspension settings Santa Cruz recommends for my weight and ride in the high shock position.
Here is what I have found when riding:
1. Riding Pinball Downhill high speed chunky sections on Noble Canyon yesterday felt like a powder day on skis. The suspension fully absorbed the chatter and gave me outstanding control.
2. On dusty switchbacks I can totally commit to the Fox 38 when cornering and let the back end follow. It feels almost like I am surfing or carving. Similar experience on off-camber ruts and switchbacks, where I can put my front wheel where I want, trust it will stick, and then use my hips to either hold the chosen line or drop the back wheel right into a rut or onto a spot on the berm.
3. It is well supported on climbs and I can make it around tighter technical switchbacks that I couldn't make it around on my other bikes and can weight and unweight either wheel or trackstand at times I couldn't on other bikes.
4. With stock settings it feels firm on chunky climbs, but in a good way and not so much that it compromises riding. I think it would be a mistake to not use Santa Cruz's recommended settings.
5. I rode widowmaker on Noble Canyon for the first time out of maybe 50 tries I've done there over the years. Also cleared Stairway to Hell for just my second time and made it further up the Extra Credit climb sections than I have in the past.
Overall, this is a f---ing great bike and Santa Cruz deserves credit, both for the overall execution, and for the extra effort they put into engineering the XXL size.
I find the rear suspension stays really composed in the mid stroke, but then often bottoms out harshly when you have bigger hits (with recommended setup).
36 lb Meta = Heavy
Perceived or rolling weight vs scale weight? Trying as hard as I can to avoid price.
I think the best way to go is buy a base model complete with the frameset you want. Sell off what you want and upgrade it. Little more work but more savings. Unless you work at a lbs and can snag some solid discounts
Yes... 2 pounds is noticeable. The weight/feel was the first comment from the same rider/reviewer on the same trails
Overall, the new Mega feels particularly damped/confidence inspiring IMO (maybe it's my slightly higher rider weight of 170lbs). Struggling with the comments about traction too - for me, this battle was completely won or lost primarily through LSC adjustment on the stock X2. Too much LSC and I lost traction, dial it back and there's traction for days (while still maintaining a decent platform to push off of).
Thanks!
i just looked and Alicia did the write up for the Stumpy Evo in the last field test, so I'd love to hear the cross category comparison.
If you're on the fence, I'd recommend really thinking about the trails you ride most often and what exactly you need the bike to do. If you don't need long travel, an aggressive trail bike is probably a good option. If you're racing enduros and/or riding gnar frequently, you'll probably be happier on something like the Mega that has plenty of travel but is an adequate climber.
Sorry I can't give you any specific numbers... I don't quite trust my memory that well
This is an industry issue, that anyone who reads (every single) pinkbike comment section is aware of.
Then again, the Mega isn't going to be getting any wins either unless they get some fresh blood. Unfortunately Iago can't seem to break top 20.
Apparently the Mega has less traction than a Stumpjumper so I guess it's doomed lol
But the point is the Enduro hasn’t really done sh*t for wins either.
I would much rather hear the reviews from riders here versus an over stimulated verb flinging review from the marketing industry
Overall takeaway is that it seems like conti benchmarked a lot of the others in competition and decided to improve a lot of stuff, because of their reputation lacking in the past. Are they the perfect tire for everyone everywhere ? probably not, but for someone tired of the BS with maxxis (warped casings, leaking sealant, torn sideknobs) they are a good option to try out.
Personally I'd really like to try out the new michelin offerings as well but I haven't seen any available for ages.
yeah, they have nice team and cool ad, however majority do not ride like a rider from ad
also SC suspension not the best in the market to say, neither geo as well;
honestly it is fun boy product, however not the best
now I'm thinking that just won't be enough. I might try and sell it to get a Megatower. Does anyone have any insider information on which rear shock is the best? I did notice that the rockshox coil on the Megatower is in fact the new one with the HBO. I've heard really good things about it. But the air is lighter and probable a bit more tunable.
Santa Cruz would find instant benevolence to lower prices if sales dried up.
observer.com/2018/02/misahara-jewelry-designer-lepa-galeb-roskopp-home-tour
I don't know if any "city" on earth has as much apparel behind it as Santa Cruz.
And I fully support your idea of a Santa Cruz fastrak lane... speaking of which... pretty sure I blew though about 20 fastrak check marks on my way to the mountains to ride last week. Should be fun to see how much it's gonna cost me.
Hmmm...
Thank you for the matrix!
Really wish everyone with 5k bikes would stop whining about bikes costing too much, we all want cheap bikes they perform well! Complain about something original already.