First Look: Intend's Upside Down XC Fork Uses a Carbon-Tubed Damper

Dec 16, 2022
by Mike Levy  
Intend Samurai


High-end mountain bike suspension isn't exactly holding most of us back, but what if you're looking for something a bit more exotic? That's when you might turn to someone like Cornelius Kapfinger, founder of Intend Bicycle Components and very-low volume maker of boutique suspension forks, shocks, and other parts. Intend is probably best known for inverted forks, and today the German company is releasing their short-travel Samurai which is available in four distinct configurations.

We first saw the Samurai at Eurobike and on the front of one of Dangerholm's crazy creations, but we've got all the details in this third look, including on the carbon-equipped CC model that weighs just 1,390-grams. The XC fork uses a RockShox Charger RD damper and also has 120mm of travel, while the 130mm TR model gets Intend's own damper cartridge for riders looking for more travel. If you're wanting the opposite, there's even a Samurai GR for the front of your gravel bike.

The XC and GR forks cost 1649 €, the TR model is 1799 €, and the CC will sell for 1949 € when it's eventually available.
Samurai details

• Intended use: Trail, cross-country, gravel
• Travel: 120 - 130mm
• Air-sprung
• CC, XC, GR require RockShox Charger RD damper (rebound, lockout, LSC)
• TR comes w/ Intend damper (rebound, LSC)
• Weight: 1,390 - 1,555 grams
• MSRP: 1649 € - 1949 €
• More info: www.intend-bc.com

Intend Samurai
Yeah, but is there carbon inside of your fork?


Samurai Models

Samurai TR - The 130mm TR is the fork for more aggressive riding, Intend says, and it skips the RockShox Charger Race Day damper for one of the German brand's own designs in order to get that extra 10mm of stroke. The body is a carbon fiber tube, because of course it is, and it offers rebound and low-speed compression adjustments but not the external lock-out lever found at the top of the Race Day unit. Essentially, it's a tiny version of what's used inside Intend's Hero trail bike fork, but in a 130mm-package that can be lowered down to just 80mm in 10mm increments. The TR costs 1799 € ready to ride.

Samurai XC - The 1,515-gram XC fork uses the same chassis as the TR but there are two important differences: It has 120mm of travel and requires RockShox's excellent Charger Race Day damper with lockout control that can be had on the fork crown or the handlebar... But you'll need to find your own Charger damper because the XC doesn't come with its own. Like the other Samurais, it also gets the updated crown and dropouts, and it can be fitted with the also-new 180mm post-mount brake adapter. The damper-less XC costs 1649 €.


Intend Samurai
The 130mm Samurai TR is air-sprung and uses Intend's own damper.
Intend Samurai
If gravel isn't weird enough, here's an inverted fork with 50mm of travel.


Samurai CC and GR - Riders wanting all the fancy and less weight might be into the Samurai that comes with a carbon fiber steerer tube from suspension outfit ND Tuned that weighs around 95 grams. That's roughly half the weight of an alloy steerer, which ND Tuned also offers for those who may have only measured once before cutting... The other carbon bits on the CC are the hose guides that Intend sourced from HOPP Carbon Parts. The 120mm CC also needs RockShox's Charger damper that not only has a lockout lever but, very conveniently, weighs 30 grams less than Intend's version.

All that adds up to just 1,390 grams (with the flat mount), making it one of the lightest 120mm forks on the market. The CC costs 1949 € (not including the Charger damper) and will be available later this year.

Weighing more but having just 50mm of travel, the 1,450-gram Samurai GR is ideal for your no-holds-barred curly-bar build that needs a ton of tire clearance. It retails for 1649 € but, like the XC and CC forks, you'll need to also source your own RockShox Charger damper.


Intend Samurai
All the new forks use updated crowns and dropouts.
Intend Samurai
The Samurai CC gets a carbon steerer tube and weighs just 1,390 grams.


Author Info:
mikelevy avatar

Member since Oct 18, 2005
2,032 articles

132 Comments
  • 107 4
 I’m considering taking up XC just to have a reason to buy one
  • 27 1
 I want an Intend samurai on a YT Itzo...
  • 32 1
 Update: I went out to the garage to see if I had anything that takes a 100mm'ish fork. Do we think a boutique carbon fibre USD fork would suit my slightly rusty 2008 dirt jumper with cranks that don't turn properly because I accidentally left it outside by the pumptrack for a whole British 'summer'?
  • 6 0
 If only they did a rear shock called the sumo...
  • 13 0
 @Woody25: Carbon don't rust. You're good to go!
  • 1 0
 My thoughts exactly Big Grin
  • 1 0
 Yes XC it've been good fuel to our sport. Nothing better then fitness.
  • 1 0
 The colours remind me of a 2013 suntour rux
  • 2 0
 @bunjiman82: I intend to put one on
  • 4 0
 @Woody25: You left your bike outside for four days?
  • 1 0
 @Woody25: Did you know they make new BBs? Your cranks can spin like new!
  • 1 0
 @captaintyingknots: I just tell people it's like that so I know where my pedals will be when landing supermans and nothings
  • 1 0
 @Woody25: probably not cause of straight 1 1/8th head tube on those old turds.
  • 51 2
 Cornelius Kapfinger has got to be the greatest name I have ever heard. Nice forks too.
  • 30 3
 Its got a Bond villain sort of ring to it.
  • 1 0
 Sounds like someone who would would laugh maniacally over one million dollars
  • 4 2
 Dick Pound
  • 2 1
 @bmx-background: Ahh, yes. Mr. Pound. Ironically not an adult film star...
  • 17 2
 Inverted gravel forks actually make a lot of sense. That style of riding isn’t really going to splash and circulate oil to the top seals of a standard fork. Tortional rigidity is also less of a concern, additionally the stanchions are very short which would help anyway.
  • 16 3
 Technically yes, but if I look at all the scratches on my fork's lower legs they better come up with some good protection for the stancions......
  • 5 4
 @dennis72: On a gravel bike? My XC bikes lower legs are clean.
  • 5 0
 @dennis72: There are carbon guards for the dorado and intend ones from Rulezman
  • 4 1
 @dennis72: Rulezman sells carbon protectors for the stanchions
  • 1 1
 @dennis72: Yeah. Exactly my first thought upon seeing it!
That is some beautiful machining, or molding, or whatever they did to turn out such a perfect-looking piece of
fork-art.
I'd be scared to ride such a beauty!
  • 14 13
 Or you could just buy a mountain bike instead of pretending that your gravel bike is anything more than replicating the early days of MTB, then finding out it’s too uncomfortable and needs suspension.

Seriously, gravel bikes are probably some of the most eye-roll inducing things since calling regular bikes “acoustic”
  • 8 0
 @nickfranko: tell everyone you don’t know much about gravel bikes without telling everyone you don’t know much about gravel bikes.
  • 2 0
 I'm quite surprised RS didn't make the new Rudy gravel fork out of a repurposed 27.5in RS-1. Another advantage is if you're backpacking and strapping bottle cages to your forks, it makes more sense to do it on the suspended uppers of a USD fork, than the un-suspended lowers of a regular fork
  • 9 1
 Carbon fiber USD fork. It is like a short travel Dorado. The choice to sell a fork and leave the customer to find and install a fitting damper cartridge is an interesting one. Sure it must be doable but I wonder how many potential customers would be put off by this. Most likely though, customers wanting an Intend fork will just want a full Intend fork, with the Intend damper installed hence just go for the TR version and ride it right away. It is the same price as their Hero fork, just limited to shorter travel. But my bike is for 120mm travel forks anyway so I suppose it wouldn't matter which one I'd get, should I ever get one.
  • 6 0
 get one. They're good
  • 6 2
 Especially because Raceday Cartridges are total crap: oil leak after one hour of riding (the lockout piston seal works on an edge that rips it off) and the oil quantity is so little that you need to bleed it every month
  • 17 0
 @trnxxx: Well, seems that the name of the cartridge is fitting.
  • 1 0
 @Notmeatall: nailed it
  • 4 0
 @trnxxx: i mean, it says it in the name doesn't it ? Meant for a day of racing, strip and rebuild.
  • 5 1
 Probably working on the reasonable assumption that most buyers will already have a bike running a RS SID SL which already has the Race Day Damper. And as you cannot run two forks on the same bike it would be an easy swap over when installing the Intend.
  • 2 0
 @Balgaroth: yeah but that leaking issue isn’t fixable, it’s a terrible product that rockshox should be ashamed of. It’s more like meant for one day of racing, then spend $270 plus labor to replace the damper that came oem on your bike.
  • 1 0
 @olafthemoose: I hope the Intend damper is good then. Is that damper cartridge 270USD? That implies a working version of the XC fork is more expensive than the TR version (or the Intend Hero fork). And that's only for how long it works, apparently.

@andrewbikeguide : Is that a reasonable assumption? Sure it is likely to be an XC racer who gets the fork but the SID is only one of the models on the circuit, isn't it? If it is a large fraction of them then yeah, it seems fair that SID owners can save a little and at least recycle part of their fork. But from what I read, it wouldn't be odd to assume that the very reason someone replaces a SID fork is because of that very damper cartridge. Replace the entire fork but keep that one part that they hate.

Luckily, nothing is wasted. They won't build a fork they won't sell so it doesn't hurt to have the option I suppose.
  • 1 0
 The DIY damper is clever. It's a self selection filter for their customers to attract buyers that are mechanically inclined and thus maybe won't be so reliant on customer service.
  • 1 0
 @JohanG: Could flip both ways. You could attract buyers who are actually mechanically inclined. You could also attract buyers who aspire to be mechanically inclined and need some help and failures to get there. Obviously I belong to the former group. And the latter.
  • 9 0
 Can´t see anything else than the lovely Void bike
  • 2 0
 Same couldn't care about Intend's fork, that frame is gorgeous !
  • 6 0
 "Yeah, but is there carbon inside of your fork?"

Why yes there is. Fork oil has carbon, the air I inflate it with has carbon, all the O rings probably have carbon, even a coil spring most likely is high carbon steel!
  • 4 0
 Maybe I’m a little late to the USD Mtn. bike party, but is the consensus still that USD forks are more flexy than right side up forks?
And if so, is there a definitive reason for this? Someone once mentioned the lack of a fork brace, then another says that the thin wall tubes are stiffer than the lowers..
Great, but when most all motorized 2 wheel race machinery on this planet run USD forks, why is it so taboo for bikes again?
  • 6 0
 I have an Intend fork and I cannot feel any torsional differences with my previous "normal" forks from several manufacturers.
But then again, I am not a Pro.
  • 3 0
 @Bitelio:
Maybe, but if you replaced the previous fork on the same bike with the Intend fork, you may the leading expert on that specific swap!
I think I remember USD motorbike forks being heavier when they came along. And I believe the upper tubes were huge compared to the forks they replaced.
But I also remember complaints of USD forks being too stiff, hence my confusion.
It took Honda many year to go USD on the XR650. That, and dumping the steel frame for aluminum made it more of a racer rather than a “play bike”.
  • 1 0
 I'm no expert other than a have read a lot of (reveiw type) stuff of both motorbikes and mtbs when it comes to forks over a couple decades.

I think overall stiffness can be higher on a triple clamped USD fork but from a weight efficiency per unit stiffness point of view RWU is still better (Weight was reason why original fireblade had RWU)

I guess then that on motorbikes overall stiffness became a priority over a bit of extra weight...or just that the fireblade was an exception.

My understanding is a USD single crown will just be either be flexier or heavier due to lack of brace ...which becimes more important on a single crown fork (as you mention). I also think they look rank!
  • 7 6
 @Untgrad: Don't compare motor sport to bikes, there is nothing to compare. Planes don't use mtb like fork either for landing gears. The power and weight of the motor makes the relevant forces much different in fore/aft stiffness. While torsional stiffness is still mainly felt by the same rider on the same bar.
Yes the lack of a bridge makes the structure significantly less stiff on an USD fork.You can overcome that by over-engineering the tubes and axles. Crconception made a fork as stiff as a standard fork, before disappearing.
I think intend makes some quite flexy forks compared to others by a significant margin on a lab test. But the total torsional stiffness of your steering is driven by the front wheel in most of the events. So there is a good chance you can't feel much difference on a blind test; specially with XC wheels and tires.
If you can't feel the lack of stiffness of a fox 36 relative to a rockshox 32 mm chassis, there is a huge chance you can't feel some of the USD forks lack of stiffness. Some, on the other hand, are a joke, like the shiver SC 2003 that can't even brake in a straight line.
  • 1 0
 @faul: yes that makes sense as well...thanks. Fore/aft stiffness more critical on motorcycle and brace/bridge can't help with that
  • 4 0
 i often argue torsional flex is not bad for your average rider, compliance improves ride quality and when you are not as precise, your wheel deflects off little edges/roots and do not jerk you around, keeping your shoulders square, which ultimately control your direction of travel.

When you reach elite status, that's when torsion matters.
  • 7 0
 USD forks are usually stiffer front to back but due to lack of a bridge, not as tortuously stiff. Which is better? That’s up to you to decide…
  • 1 4
 @faul:
This seems like more of Mtn bike following Moto weirdness..
I wouldn’t compare if this parallel didn’t exist. It almost seems like the more “Moto” a bike looks, the better it “must” be.
Yeah, the weight penalty is real, so now we have carbon uppers. Anything to keep the Moto in biking,
  • 1 0
 @SnowshoeRider4Life:
Yup!
  • 1 0
 They may be less stiff, but it doesn't matter to many. Per that survey a few days ago, look how many riders use a 36 vs 38 because they don't need or notice the improved stiffness.
  • 1 0
 @SonofBovril: yep, that's the long and short of it. On a conventional fork, both the uppers and lowers are tied together. On USD, the uppers are fixed to each other, but the lowers are only connected by the axle, meaning a twisting motion is possible. Beefier axle would help here, or lefty style keying to the uppers. Great fore-aft as the larger diameter tubes are longer and connected to the crown
  • 1 0
 @Untgrad: I don't think Honda ever went USD on the XR650's. They have a couple models, XR650L (dual sport) and XR650R, both used a sim fork, both conventional and make no mistake, the XR650R with it's conventional fork and steel frame was a purebred RACE bike when setup right with several Baja 1000 wins.

When the alum frames first came out from Honda (1997) nobody liked it....too stiff. Lots of bikes still use steel, particularly the KTM/Husq/GG, they are every bit as racy as the alum ones.
  • 4 0
 I own an Intend Edge fork. Although the crown and the upper tubes are huge, it only weighs 2040 gramm (with 15mm axle). It has better fore/aft-stifness. The lateral stiffness feels the same as on my Fox36. Both forks 160mm. I went from 160 to 170mm of travel on the Intend and I still don't feel a difference in lateral stiffness. My weight is 85kg/187 pounds.

I know a guy who owns the same fork and also has a Fox36 (both 160mm) and he only feels a difference in lateral stiffness when he uses a front wheel with a carbon rim.
  • 4 0
 @faul: nothing to compare? Like disc brakes, use of suspension, damper technology, larger front wheel vs back....lots of compare with and lots of trickle over.

I think there is a lot of benefit for USD forks in MTB, but may not be as big of deal as moto and may not be worth the $ relative to how big of a difference it will make on a MTB.

Of the people I've known that had the Shiver's back in they day, they all liked them, I think the 'flexy' rumor is more rumor that reality. I didn't find them flexy when I rode them nor did many.
  • 1 0
 It's not taboo but I think your $ to performance ratio or peformance to weight is not significantly better than a conventional fork. I think the flex argument is a bit tired, even back in the early 2000's when guys were standing in front of their bikes twisting the bars saying they were flexy really didn't experience lots of flex on the trail.
  • 1 0
 @Untgrad: *Edit - meant to say XR650R had 'conventional' alum frame vs perimeter....but re-reading your comment, I think you meant the transition from XR600 to XR650 and it becoming a race bike? If so, yeah, it was a beast!
  • 1 0
 Bump
  • 2 1
 @RadBartTaylor: the things that matter aren't your disc brake or the fact that you have two wheels, it's the two orders of magnitudes of energy the fork needs to transmit somehow. Otherwise a plane also have different wheel sizes, suspensions, dampers. But no one except cannondale ask "why not a landing gear to hold the front wheel"
The "flexy rumor" isn't a rumor considering the shiver SC. I have one from 2003. it's in my house right now. You can't brake in straight line because that's enough to twist the fork. I had to find a 160mm adapter from the era to ride it as 203mm was a joke. But being USD isn't the only shit engineering that cause it, but I never had another fork that noodly ever. More recent ones (204 or 2005+) have been corrected so they may be a bit better. The DC were ok. the SC from 2003, you have to turn your bar 15-20° more than where you want your wheel to be, and before you want to turn. That's insane and not an exaggeration. I should have filmed it when I could.
These forks has well adjusted sliding bushings and open bath cartridge, metal coils. They were "striction free" for the era (still not garbage today but you can find much better now). so of course you'll find people that liked them. Hey, I'd love riding mine on light trails... If I could find proper 30mm seals.
USD forks can do only one thing on a MTB: increasing bushing overlap if it's a dual crown. That's a huge benefit tho. Any other benefits you can read are often plain false or not as relevant as you'd think.
  • 2 1
 @RadBartTaylor:
If there’s nothing to compare then why do professional Mtn bikers train on motorcycles?
Arron Gwin came straight from Moto to dominate, and a lot of guys and gals use Moto bikes for all out speed training.
Hydraulic disc brakes..
Twin tube dampers..
Linkage suspension..
A modern trail bike looks more like a motorcycle than a motorcycle from the early 1980’s!
  • 1 0
 @Untgrad: I think that was meant for @faul and not me?
  • 2 0
 @RadBartTaylor:
I sent it as a continuation of your point..
  • 2 1
 @Untgrad: Take a motorbike, remove the motor, put cranks , and see how absurd comparing the two was in the first place?
  • 2 0
 @faul:
It’s not.
  • 2 0
 @faul:
Take a Mtn bike, put an electric motor in it..
  • 2 0
 @faul: to @Untgrad point, many of the top DH/Enduro guys race moto in the offseason for good reason.

Much of the tech from moto has enabled what we see in MTB.....
  • 1 0
 @RadBartTaylor: XR650R never had a steel frame.
  • 2 0
 @KellChris: I meant to say conventional frame (vs perimeter), not steel frame, but I corrected that several posts above
  • 2 0
 If torsional stiffness is the main issue (looks aside), then why don't see this overcome with roller bearings and flats on the stanchions to prevent twisting - like Cannondale with their Lefty, er, ...fork?

Or have they prevented any further innovation by protecting the idea with patents?
  • 6 1
 Cool fork, but the single crown Shiver from 2002 is cooler.
  • 1 0
 Inverted forks just seem correct to me, my only experience was an rs1 rlc which i thought was a bit crap cos of the 15mm maxle. You could see the wheel wobble about under hard braking.
A nice 30mm axle and 2 beefy pinch bolts per side would surely cure all the torsional flex issues?
  • 1 0
 Perhaps this may be a n00b question, but wouldn't inverted forks have a higher chance of dirt/dust migrating past the seals, into the reservoir, and contaminating the oils? Also, wouldn't the stanchions being that closer to the ground have a higher chance of being dinged on a rock/damaged from debris? I
  • 1 0
 Maverick had an upside down fork 15+ years ago that is super light as well. Gee, I am actually selling a couple for a friend. The design yields quicker smoother action as it's friction point is closer to the source of the friction. Intend should incorporate a rock guard into the the design; Maverick did. Nice to see this design re-emerge.
  • 2 0
 Will we see MTB aesthetics being shaped around having a static mudguard under the headtube? How can this be made to not look goofy?
  • 2 0
 underrated issue - at least for us in the wet UK.
Those early 2000s style guards at the steerer tube were hideous and made worse by people calling them "moto style".
Whereas fork arch mudguards, many people run year round now because they are unobtrusive and neat.
  • 4 1
 This one tickles in funny places.
  • 3 0
 I bet @mikelevy is frothing for one of those upside down gravel forks
  • 2 0
 What is the bike in the first picture? It looks very familiar, but I can’t place it.
  • 2 0
 Kingdom Void.
  • 1 0
 @Dc5478: I knew it!! Thanks
  • 3 0
 I will wait until Samurai becomes Ronin
  • 1 0
 What’s it like owning an Intend fork or shock in the US? Do you need to mail it to Germany for service or are they serviceable at home?
  • 2 0
 Serviceable at home for most stuff. They have videos online.
  • 3 2
 Good luck getting one in the USA. Dude ghosted me after a month of exchanging emails when I was interested in getting an enduro fork and shock. Lame sauce.
  • 3 0
 I didn't have any issues. I emailed them, asked some questions, they replied within a day. They built and shipped it faster than what they said they would and it took 3 days in shipping.
  • 1 0
 Not to be a jerk but I am interested in this. Did you have a conversation with him for a month repeating that you were interested and then still not purchase after 30 days of emails, or did you have a conversation and commit to a purchase and he left you hanging?
  • 4 1
 @jmhills: He asked details of my bike. I asked details of shock and fork. I then asked to send invoice, he said he would send, and never did. This was over a span of about 4 weeks, then I gave up. I went with Fox for a third of the price and arrived in 3 days.
  • 2 0
 @fredro: Yeah, that sucks.
  • 1 0
 @jmhills: FWIW I had no problem communicating with the Intend team over several months, including invoicing, payment, AND a shipping problem where part of my order was lost by the carrier due to box damage (Intend handled it). We are talking about maybe 2-3 people working a shop doing hundreds of orders and machining and assembling stuff, then doing customer service. Having to send a "can i get an update" email once or twice is going to happen.... The crazy thing is this guy has managed a product release cadence of sometimes monthly, when the big 2 are lucky to do minor revisions on an annual basis. Wild.
  • 1 2
 Anyone used to USD forks and off-road, the inevitable pissing of damper fluid passed the seals as caught me out many, many times despite regular seal cleaning! I had a Whyte 46 with the Maverick fork back in the day, crazy light but seal gone on the first ride. Good luck with these......
  • 5 3
 I'll just keep my Pike, it already has a Rockshox damper.
  • 2 0
 That crown make it looks like a shiver SC.
  • 5 2
 USD forks are so sexy
  • 2 1
 How is the torsional stiffness? My RS-1 is barely tolerable and has a special hub.
  • 2 0
 Can we please call it an inverted fork? Upside down?? Ok children…
  • 1 1
 @mikelevy I don't understand. You get to write an article about Intend and you don't seize the opportunity to at least mention the guy's name!?
  • 1 0
 Yeah, he could have compared him to a bond villain... that'd be super original and super funny.
  • 2 0
 At least it isn't a Lefty.
  • 2 0
 More interested in those brakes tho
  • 1 0
 I was scrolling through the comments waiting for someone else to notice those.
  • 1 0
 All the better to scratch the shit out of the parts that need protection the most
  • 1 0
 So a short-legged Dorado for 'Gravel' bikes. Are we still pretending off-road roadies aren't slowly moving towards XC bikes?
  • 1 0
 Another upside down fork? How many of these have to be reinvented before these bike companies give up on that idea?
  • 1 0
 Side question, What brakes are those on that Norco example picture?
  • 1 0
 that's some Trickstuff brakes. Intend is a company close to trickstuff so you often see both on the same bikes.
  • 1 0
 Cornelius Kapfinger- Mississippi State
  • 3 1
 Oh my gosh. Sexy AF.
  • 5 4
 The Wren forks are way better, easier to maintain, and cost less.
  • 1 0
 If they weighed less i would get one for my trek supercaliber but they weigh nearly double my fox 32 stepcast but for the money those wren forks look fantastic
  • 4 1
 Ugh, no. They are cookie cutter chineseium garbage.
  • 1 0
 Wren forks are owned by NWA?
  • 1 0
 Hopefully the cc version launches soon!
  • 1 0
 where does the mudguard go?
  • 1 0
 Why??? So easy to break against a rock while riding in ruts
  • 1 0
 I'm ready to fork over some cash.
  • 1 0
 So nobody will see I have carbon in my fork? No, thanks.
  • 1 0
 Better than sid wc or 32sc?
  • 1 0
 Sooo... Where do I mount the fender without crown!?
  • 1 0
 What Norco model is that? Cool color.
  • 1 0
 Awesome engineering and design!
  • 4 4
 Stop trying to make inverted forks happen.
  • 1 0
 I want to like them. I feel like my RS1 is super sensitive. But I can't tell if this actually helps me on the trail. For example, if you take the shock off an Ibis Ripmo, it takes like 3lbs of force to make the linkage move because of the bushing friction. I just measured this on a new one at the bike shop. But riding the Ripmo it feels like the rear end is as sensitive as a Pivot, which uses DW also but with bearings. Do the constantly lubed seals really translate to more grip on upside down forks?
  • 4 4
 A 2K€ fork without damper. Ok then....
  • 2 0
 For 2K you can buy Fork and Damper (if my quick google is correct), but yeah, your point still stands ^^ But oh well, it's boutique!
  • 3 0
 You know, there are people spending money on Fox just to get some aftermarket parts like damper cartridges, look at Avalanche, MRP, Vorsprung...
  • 2 2
 Would look so much better with black lowers
  • 1 0
 Its a work of art tup
  • 1 0
 What is 'Flatmount'?







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.058561
Mobile Version of Website