Pivot has been in the game for a while now, with both
radical designs and more careful evolutions moving their lineup along. The new Switchblade represents more of the latter approach, with small but meaningful updates to the established platform. It's a classic case of slacker head angles, steeper seat angles, and longer reach figures, plus some slight kinematic changes to accompany the more capable layout.
Build kits have been updated to align with the times as well, with a mix of Shimano and SRAM builds to suit just about anyone, so long as your starting budget is very high.
Switchblade Details• Carbon frame
• 29" wheels, mixed-wheel possible
• 142mm travel, 160mm fork
• 65.2° head angle
• 76° seat angle
• 410-500mm reach
• 431-436mm chainstay
• 12 x 157mm rear hub
• Price: $6,399 - $11,599
•
pivotcycles.com GeometryI'd classify the new Switchblade as more modern than the last, but still quite conservative relative to the broader market. Certain elements, like reach, bottom bracket drop, and stack heights are in line with other all-mountain bikes, but on other fronts the Switchblade is still reserved. For the sake of simplicity, I'm solely talking about the bike in the Low flip chip position; things are about 0.5° steeper in the high, along with the increased BB height.
The 65.2° head angle makes for a sharp handling characteristic, biased a bit towards confidence in corners as opposed to the steepest and gnarliest features. A little slacker might strike a happy balance, but the current figure does suit the overall bike's package well. The seat tube angle is a bit more of a compromise in my eyes, landing at 76° in every size's nominal saddle height. This just means that it strikes somewhere around that 76° mark where more average Small, Large, etc. riders would typically run their saddle. It's half a degree steeper than the outgoing model, but still a good bit slacker than most bikes in this travel bracket. Plenty of people will be catered to here, but I prefer a steeper seat angle for technical and graded climbing alike.
Pivot did opt for size-specific chainstays for the new bike, though the changes per size are comically small. Extra Small through Medium get 431mm stays, Large bumps up 1 millimeter to 432mm, and Extra Large gets a 436mm rear center. The overall stay length difference between XS and XL is more in line with the difference brands will apply between two consecutive sizes.
Frame FeaturesPivot's carbon frames are renowned for quality, both in material construction and the small details that make a bike easier to live with. In line with those ideals, the Switchblade has all the niceties a mechanic loves to see, like full length internally-guided cable routing, excellent bearing alignment, and plenty of well-executed gizmos to keep the bike quiet and rattle free.
They're still absent from the In-Frame Storage Club meetings, but the team in Tempe doesn't feel too left out. They did provide a second set of bottle mounts on the underside of the downtube, and have partnered with Topeak to create a line of repair tools that cleanly mount to that spot. Those kits will be available aftermarket, and come in many shapes and sizes to suit your needs.
Otherwise, it's just a very nice bike, made with durability and ride quality in mind.
Suspension DesignGenerally, things aren't drastically different on this front when compared to the outgoing Switchblade, though there are some details worth noting. Like all of Pivot's trail bikes, the Switchblade implements the DW-Link layout, which they've had the chance to optimize and refine over the years.
Setting the new bike apart from the last is a slightly longer lower link, which puts the kinematics and wheel path more in line with the Firebird than the other trail bikes in the Pivot lineup. This was meant to help square-edge performance and keep the bike moving through rough terrain, where the prior version would sometimes get held up.
Otherwise, it's meant to give the ride feel Pivots consistently offer - a very soft top end, with enough support to keep you from using all of your travel all of the time. The Switchblade is compatible with coil shocks, though all of the builds come with a Float X and a cute little sag indicator.
Less a frame feature, more of a featured frame. Accompanying the Switchblade launch is this special edition 35th anniversary bike, celebrating Pivot founder Chris Cocalis' first foray into bike design and construction: the Sun Eagle Talon. Pictured above, you have Chris' take on the perfect all-mountain bike in 1989, and in 2024. There will be a limited number of these frames, so get in touch with your local dealer if you want to get your hands on one.
Build KitsThere are plenty of builds on offer here, but none come cheap. The upside is the fact that there's no part wasted on the builds, with high quality and proven components on every tier. I've outlined the majority of offerings, though there are some pricing differences with the Talon models.
There weren't weight available for every build kit at the time of publication, but those mentioned are a size Medium.
Switchblade Ride SLX/XT // $6,399. Fox Performance suspension, Shimano SLX brakes, XT/SLX drivetrain, DT M1900 wheels.
Switchblade Ride GX AXS // $6,999. Fox Performance suspension, SRAM Code R brakes, GX T-Type drivetrain, DT M1900 wheels.
Switchblade Pro XT/XTR // $7,799 | $8,999. Fox Factory suspension, Shimano XT brakes, XT/XTR drivetrain, DT XM1700 or XMC1501 wheels. 30.78lbs / 13.96kg w/ carbon wheels.
Switchblade Pro XO AXS // $8,699 | $9,899. Fox Factory suspension, SRAM Code RSC brakes, XO T-Type drivetrain, DT XM1700 or XMC1501 wheels. 30.45lbs / 13.81kg w/ carbon wheels.
Switchblade Team XTR // $9,899. Fox Factory suspension, Shimano XTR brakes and drivetrain, DT XMC1501 wheels. 28.75lbs / 13.04kg.
Switchblade Team XX AXS // $11,399. Fox Factory suspension, SRAM Code Ultimate brakes, XX T-Type drivetrain, DT XMC1501 wheels. 29.98lbs / 13.6kg.
Limited-edition Talon builds are available as well, with Pro and Team models ranging from $9,199 to $11,599.
Ride ImpressionsMy time on the Switchblade has been isolated to some excellent riding in and around Pivot's headquarters in Tempe, Arizona. This means the bike saw plenty of tech climbs, bouldery descents, and loose dirt, with some surprise downpours thrown in to remind me of home. Limited, but with enough scope to get a sense for the bike - and boy is it fun.
In terrain that biases towards awkward, slower speed, and abrupt, the Switchblade handled excellently. You have solid control of both wheels, and can slot them into tight spots and catch backside on little trail features. As the speed picks up, there's a bit of front-rear imbalance, at least on the XL I was riding, though this only becomes noticeable in unsupported corners and looser/steeper sections of trail, where your weight is too far behind the front wheel to keep things hooking up.
That can be compensated with good body position and some mindful riding, and the rest of the geometry facilitates that quite well. The suspension performance also lends a helping hand, facilitating plenty of grip at the rear wheel and tracking very well. The bike's suspension has a quick, fluttery feel over repeated hits, and does a great job of absorbing bumps.
For more pictures of Switchblade, head on over to the album here.
I know the UDH killed flip-chips for Chainstay adjustment so do the next best thing start using Dropouts for the Chainstay rear Axle attachment and length adjustment and we can all choose what size to use.
Why is the industry so reluctant to adopt a proportionate geometry it's not like when you buy a larger size Shoe only the Toebox is extended!?!?!
Steep headangle
High BB
Slack seat angle
Short chainstays
Miss…
I always look for short chain stays and steeper head angles first so to see a new model stick to more conservative numbers is always nice
The reason many of them only do moderate changes between sizes is because if you lengthen the chain stay (notice I said chain stay and not rear center - which are difference things) the leverage ratio of the suspension is also changed. The last thing you want is for the larger frame sizes to have higher leverage ratios than the small frames as typically the larger frame sizes are ridden by heavier people. If you want the suspension kinematics to be the same across all sizes (you do) you need to keep the chainstay close to or ideally the same length.
Like what you like, but 10-15 mm if chainstays growth has negligible impact on weight distribution.
That said, I am a convert to team long chainstay, but there is obviously more to one's perception of a bikes feel than a single number or magic ratio.
The fronts have gotten a bit longer, TT grew by 11mm while reach by 50mm. HA slackened 3.5 deg.
There may be a bit more to it all, but the steeper STA definitely keeps me in a better position for steep climbs compared to 7mm preventing a rear weight bias loop out.
My opinion of course.
But on lighter trails and XC types of stuff it was horrendously boring. Getting that bike up and over fallen trees was a chore. Jumping and having fun over roots was a thing of the past.
If i lived near a lift park I would have never sold the druid - but when I'm pedaling 95% of the time on my trails the switchblade was SUCH a more fun bike.
Now living in the southwest Ive found it to be fine. It did surprisingly well on the trails around Tucson.
adjustable... sound cool as is easily done with drop outs but again, switching between requires shock changes. hence why brands dont do it.
I still dont understand this why people argue for it, Unless you want prices up even more. ride a different bike with longer CS/
people think long stays are for "straight line stability" WRONG!!!! it acutally takes weight off the rear and moves it forward, and changes where you shift you body weight in relation to the bike! bikes with loooong front ends turn better with reasonably long stays than the do with midget stays
Long Chainstays dont let you move the bike as much and its much harder to use your weight to your advantage.
Short chainstays will easily let you move the bike around
It just doesn't change weight distribution much.
I'd never say long chainstays are "bad," I just don't like the tradeoff of really long ones (445mm+) on a large. But I'm cool with the fact that lots of bike companies are going to make bikes with different geos. I don't believe that there is one perfect FC/RC ratio that needs to be preserved across sizes.
For me when my hips get too forward in relation to feet trying to load the front end that its hard to quickly and accurately shift weight fore and aft in this position (fwiw im experienced enough to nose manual around corners). A thought is that you can pick a wheelbase and shift the bb fore and aft where you like it and you are just moving your feet back and fourth... and personally i dont like mine too far back. Or you can look at a bikes front/rear center ratio and wheelbase.
1mm change in chainstay length is as effective of a change as a 1.6-1.8mm+ change im front center.
@englertracing: I don't disagree, I don't think weight distribution via geo changes (within reasonable ranges of geo) is really as big a deal as the reviewers at PB make it out to be. Going from a 435 to a 450 CS on a bike (taking wheelbase from 1250 to 1275) shifts static weight on the front up by a whopping 0.4%. In my case, as a 195 lbs rider, that's less than a pound of extra pressure on the front end.
Also, it's easier to add graphics and colour, than take it away. Theres lots of options for custom frame protection with crazy graphics for those who want that.
Using a M for comparison to the '19 FB, the '24 SB is:
0.4" longer top tube
0.20° steeper head angle
0.25° steeper seat angle (!!)
0.2" lower bottom bracket
1.0" higher stack
0.4" longer reach
0.2" LONGER wheelbase
This bike is going to be awesome for 90% of the riders looking for something bigger than a XC/Trail ride that can handle all day epics without the weight penalty of a bigger park bike.
This includes no high pivot nor headset routing bullshit.
Im in the market for a DH frame and specifically 148 rear spacing so I've always got extra hubs and wheels to swap.
It's unfortunate that Pivot went SB157, while I settled on Boost148 for the whole fleet. If it wasn't for SB157, I'd probably still own a Pivot these days.
On most other bikes with their long chainstays there is plenty of room and absolutely no need to touch superboost (or boost, for that matter). Especially nowadays with strictly 1x drivetrains.
Sadly, some companies are even moving to 55mm chainlines on frames with long chainstays. Thats bad design but not obvious on the showroom floor and conveniently ignored by most bike reviews (NSMB being somewhat of an exception).
Step2: disappointment
I can put up with SLX/XT, superboost, and a Grip damper for $400 more.
And on that point, is the main reason for them using Superboost so that they can get the short rear end? In that case it's doubly pointless for my use.
Arguably there is a case for ditching 148 standard so we can all enjoy DH wheel strength on all our bikes.
"“For Pivot, we are able to design a bike with better tire clearance, better strength and stiffness in key areas" -Pivot from that article.
It seems to me that Pivot could've done the same with a DH 157 wheel. So it is not about the wheel, but the frame designers ability to create something they believe will provide benefit. Other companies and me do not think the aforementioned downsides are worth it.
Like 0.3 deg change on the HTA is basically within margin of error. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to hear this is the same bike as the 2020 model except they changed a lower link and did a paint/graphics update.
Looks equal, and the new model, nothing that’s a good works angleset can’t do!
Want a bike that manuals or hops easily? Accept having a shorter tt. Want a bike that excels at flat corners? Accept a longer cs.
I was already happily a Shimano guy. Even more now that I realize this.
Their STA numbers are always on the low side,
Chain stays are too short (that size specific detail they have is nonsense). Maybe DW Link doesn't work so well with long chain stays, Ibis are super short too.
And the Press Fit BB and SB rear are the final turnoffs.
Middle sizing must be ace to ride. XL is to unbalanced for me to consider buying one.
The STA is misleading on pivots because although they’re “slack” on paper, the seat tubes are completely straight so you don’t have that actual vs effective STA going on. They’re incredibly comfortable to climb on.
Then, I look at the prices relative to the spec and think there’s nothing that comes close to the custom build I have on my 2020 Carbon Transition Patrol.
I've auctually servised a Switchblade where you could press out the bearings with your thumbs which is also sad. The bike had a hole on the frame where the rubber protector is behind the bb. A stone got stuck there and it rubbed a hole in the frame. Worst experience ever with that brand.
Also, the vast majority of riders are essentially just cruising along, so max corner speed for example really doesn't matter so much in the end.
Still way to expensive and no adjustability(Leverage/headset etc)
Scumbags.