We've already covered Norco's new DH race rig pretty extensively in the Inside Scoop article that Matt wrote up this past August, with a detailed look at the test mule they've been developing things on. Now some of the intangibles have been set in stone, with a patent filed to describe the rear suspension kinematic and all it's contingent components.
Published by the US Patent Office earlier this morning, Norco's novel suspension design sports a few details we don't often see in combination, as well as a wide array of possible adjustments to change the kinematic bit by bit.
As touched on in that first look, the bike implements a 6-link design, with the added complexity put in place to allow for that kinematic alteration without too many knock-on effects. Those two extra links come in the form of an upper shock link actuation member, and a pushrod actuating the damper member. As noted in the coverage of the test mule:
"The lower link mounted to the front triangle and the chainstay also drives a pushrod link that actuates a further upper link that drives the shock. That pushrod link rotates on two spherical bearings to isolate the link driving the shock from lateral loads."One of Norco's development engineers laid out the principle goals of the new designs when we met with the team back in August, and those goals are worth reiterating here.
| We’ve filed two patents based on the suspension layout and kinematic adjustment designed into the new DH race bike. The first patent applies to the overall suspension layout which retains the axle path and anti-rise characteristics of the high virtual pivot layout used on the Range while introducing a dedicated shock actuation link for greater independent control of the bike’s leverage curve. The second patent applies to the method of leverage curve progression adjustment we’ve designed into the bike which allows us to alter the level of support from the rear suspension in isolation without needing to alter shock tune, damper settings, spring rate or shock pressure.— Colin Ryan |
Though they were tight with information about the specific curves the bike was achieving, those are laid out a bit more plainly in the newly filed patent. Great care was taken to differentiate the new 6-link design from prior 4-link (referred to as "prior art" throughout the patent) designs, particularly in the leverage ratio and progression department. Those factors can be altered by changing the mounting points of the shock and other members, though the resultant curves aren't specifically laid out in the patent.
Though there are no numbers accompanying these figures, the shape tells the story. "Rear Suspension 10," which represents Norco's new 6-link layout, shows a more linear and consistent curve than a traditional 4-bar, in both progression and leverage ratio. This should help make shock tuning process easier, and assure that the ride quality is consistent and predictable. Being able to preserve these characteristics while changing other variables is impressive, and should allow for careful, discreet tuning of different areas of the bike.
The described model has a high instant center that moves forward as the suspension is compressed, which is a determining factor in the overall axle path of the rear wheel. This can negatively effect the anti-rise curve of the bike, so extra links are used to maintain the desired non-linear anti-rise curve that is typical in a 4-bar layout.
The patent also describes an alternative layout to the current design, meant to achieve the same variable control and kinematic. It's hard to say whether this will show up for other packaging application, such as a trail bike, ebike, or alternative downhill frame, but it's there to see just the same.
Beyond all the kinematic information presented in the patent, there are some other interesting details worth noting that showed up in the designs.
As you can see here, the bottom bracket shell is far more complex than the typical cylinder most bikes use. The mule had a racetrack-shaped bottom bracket, which is likely used to alter ride height and pedaling forces on the suspension, but this diagram shows what could be more space to the front of the BB as well, perhaps for more adjustment or a more robust method of fixing the bearing in place.
Also shown in a couple of the drawings are what look like bottle bosses in the downtube of the frame, both in groups of three. That's a detail that wasn't present on the alloy mule, but I'd guess they're a more elegant method for playing with chassis weight. You could bolt weights to the various points of the frame, effecting the ride characteristics significantly.
The new bike certainly looks to be a well-engineered project, and with team testing well underway with their newest
up-and-coming athlete, this is sure to be an exciting season for Norco on the world stage. We'll be trying to get our hands on one of these as soon as possible, so stay tuned.
Editor's Note: We've received this note from Norco, regarding the new design and their plans going forward.
| You were quick to spot this one! The patent that was published today is one of the patents we spoke about with Matt when he visited last summer to chat about our DH bike. This patent applies to the suspension layout used on our new DH race bike and was developed from our learning with the High Virtual Pivot layout on the Range. We wanted a suspension layout that built off the benefits of the Range while allowing more independent adjustability of different kinematic traits to tailor the bike exactly to the needs of the Norco Factory Racing team. This design has proven itself over the last season and a half of testing first with our DH Development Engineer Kirk and later with the team riders. We’re excited to continue to develop it this year with the Norco Factory Racing team!— Colin Ryan |
www.bicycleretailer.com/industry-news/2022/12/28/trek-ranks-high-trademark-oppositions
Some riders don't need oodles of travel, but they want a competent descender. This bike could be an absolute riot, and finally give the successful short travel Druid a run for it's money. For these people, the benefits of HP are worth it in a short travel package.
It's simply foolish to say something isn't the innovation we need - as consumers we want all innovation and all the choices we can get.
The Optik was a an efficient climber and a really good descending short travel bike. Changing it to a HP does indeed make it a Druid competitor, but you lose efficiency and practicality in order to gain a different descending characteristic, one that many don't want.
Of course, I could totally be wrong once I get a chance to ride the new Optik. But the change to "more capable" descender isn't always a good one. When Norco changed the 2019 Sight to the 2020 iteration, they lost a playful trail bike in exchange for a mini-Range.
Personally, I believe that Norco is making some really good changes to their lineup. The new Fluid fills in for the outgoing Optic, and now the Optic becomes a rowdier short travel trail bike for those who don't need a Sight. This gives riders two choices in just Norco's trail bike category which is a win win for consumers.
The new Slash is a great example of how well an HP bike can climb, and many argue it climbs better than the outgoing non-HP version. This tells us that the Optic could still be an efficient climber, but we'll of course find out once it's released.
I-track's patent seems to be about a moving idler in relation to the front triangle, so putting the idler on the high pivot bolt isnt infringing?
If they were trying to avoid the patent why do so many try it/do it?
Does any brand put the idler on an upper link like the enduro/stumpy has? does that fall into the patent?
Novel because it hasn't been applied to an inverted-horst high-pivot, but the idea of a secondary linkage to control leverage independently of the axle path is not at all novel.
In this case the progression curve just makes the above calculation at each step of the travel. I don't personally think progression is some magical metric that tells you everything about the bike but looking at where the progression is being added in the travel can be just one more helpful bit of info when tuning.
Source: I wrote the software that output those curves.
Hey look - a Bushtit
I frequent the bark park quite a bit, but everyone knows the types of people described
This made me LOL more than it should.
Do you fit the bottom bracket by only screwing it in to the left?
Great care = plotting one dataset with small circles and the other dataset with smaller circles...
Without context (or a microscope) it's difficult to tell which is which.
trek has a lifetime warranty... Good thing as I just found a headtube crack today..
www.trekbikes.com/ca/en_CA/warranty_policy
I would never consider a frame with less than 5 years warranty. Why? Because I've cracked every frame I've owned since 2007.
I wouldn't buy a bike without a good warranty...
That's probably why companies offer them...
this pic shows it pretty well: www.pinkbike.com/photo/25290200
Dear google... Stop it! Lol.
Bet if he turned up and met you, wanted a shred with you you would be frothing.
Have some pals that hated Tom Hardy, met him in the pub and we're all over him, proper fan boys. Cracked me up.