Nordest Announces Britango MK3 'Downcountry' Hardtail

Jan 26, 2024
by Matt Beer  
Nordest Britango MK3

Rugged, steel hardtails may not be the first type of bike that come to mind when you hear the term downcountry, but that’s exactly what Nordest is calling their Britango MK3 frame.

In fact, it’s a genre of riding that the brand takes credit for, and I quote, "Well, it's something we invented in Nordest and it looks like a cross country bike when you go up a mountain track and an enduro bike when you go down fast on the trails."

While the truth in that statement may be skewed slightly, the Canary Island-based brand certainly does have a worldwide cult following for its rugged steel and titanium bikes. The Britango is built from 4130 chromoly and designed around a 140 mm fork, making it less aggressive than the Bardino, Nordest’s enduro model.
Britango MK3 Details

• 4130 Chromoly frame
• 29 x 2.6" or 27.5 x 2.8" wheels
• 120-140mm fork
• 65° head angle, 75° seat angle (140mm fork)
• Reach: 446, 466 or 486mm
• 435mm chainstays
• Frameset price: €649 EUR
nordestcycles.com


Nordest Britango MK3
Nordest Britango MK3
Nordest Britango MK3

Frame Details

The main updates on the Britango MK3 are the geometry and inclusion of UDH. The dropouts are spaced for 148 mm Boost hubs and the frame can accept cushy 29“ x 2.6 tires, or for even more traction, 27.5“ x 2.8“ tires.

A straight TR 44 headset and 31.6mm seat post diameter specification are used in the chromoly frame. Playing to their hardwearing, bikepacking ethos, all of the cable routing is external except the dropper post, which runs along the down tube and feeds up through the bottom of the seat tube.

The Britango MK3 is available in three sizes and two simple colors: black or white, both with a splash of yellow at the head tube. Nordest claims the steel hardtail weighs 2.69kg for the M/L size frame, which is 160g lighter than the Bardino.

photo

Geometry

Those three sizes (M, M/L, L) are designed to fit riders 168 cm all the way up to 198 cm, which does leave out those shorter end of the height ruler.

The reach on those three bikes equates to 446, 466, 486 mm each equipped with an agile, 425 mm chain length.

As for the angles, the 140 mm fork produces a 65° head tube angle and 75° for the seat tube. This length of fork is designed to be run at 20% sag. In this configuration, Nordest suggests a 40 mm long stem for all three sizes.

For those looking for a snappier handling bike and potentially better climber, the Britango can accept fork travel as low as 120 mm, which should steepen up the head tube and seat tube angles by a degree, putting the rider's weight further forward.

Nordest Britango MK3

Pricing and availability

Nordest is taking pre-orders for the Britango MK3 frame which start at €649 (VAT inc.). The delivery is slated for May 2024 and the price includes free shipping throughout the EU.

Author Info:
mattbeer avatar

Member since Mar 16, 2001
360 articles

109 Comments
  • 14 0
 Wow, another one! Thanks Mike, we miss you. This does look like a well sorted frame. My Chromag Surgace Voyager has very similar geometry and I find it to hit a great sweet spot for trail riding where I ride. I like the paint job here too!
  • 17 1
 All hardtails should have horizontal dropouts!!!!!!
  • 7 0
 THIS. And no serious hardtail frame should be lacking it's BB and headset spec on the mfg website.
  • 17 0
 Thank you for the comment. We have added to the website that. This is 73mm BSA and the head tube is for ZS44/EC44 headset type.
  • 17 9
 I actual think downcountry is totally valid, if we maintain terms like "cross country" and "enduro". I ride my bike up hills with the explicit intent to ride downhills. Ive never crossed the county for the sake of crossing it, or endured a trail if I didn't have to. I still don't know what the hell freeride is.
  • 17 0
 Freeride for sure ain't free
  • 6 0
 @Rickadams243: it ain't dead either.
  • 8 0
 But are you riding down a "country"?
  • 4 0
 I thought Riding uphill with the explicit intent to ride downhills is enduro
  • 1 0
 @Rickadams243: yeah, but if you don't pay your buck o' five, who will?
  • 1 0
 i did the colorado trail with a 2014 diamondback overdrive. def wish i had some more travel and a better bike now, but didn't know anything about bikes back then. its crossing a state, but those trails are pretty intense.
  • 16 8
 Any hardtail can be anything, depending on whether you over-fork or under-fork it.
  • 5 1
 Down-up-sideways-fun-goodtimes-country
  • 8 0
 Underforked and slackened is the way to go.
  • 1 0
 @fartymarty: too right
  • 4 0
 Ahem! Umm you guys at Nordfest. Ever heard of Norco or Kona hardtails? Sure, you might make steel frames but to claim you invented the genre is a bit of a stretch. I raised my 19yr old son on riding these frames with frankenbike forks and brakes. I have seen a great many hardtails pedalling up the North Shore to get to the down trails and this was when the original Pike 140mm was THE thing to have on your legit descender.
  • 1 0
 @maxetak: IKR - I'm still looking for an excuse to 'upgrade' my 2017 Kona Explosif, this (and the new Pace hardtail) ain't it.
  • 3 0
 Respectfully disagree. Frames are designed around an ideal a2c distance, and overforking leads to wandering front end that lifts off the trail on accents. This why I'm a big fan of adjustable travel forks. Steep on the way up, slack on the way down.
  • 3 0
 @maxetak: add Rocky Mountain to the list. Specifically the Blizzard with the sloped top tube starting 30 years again.
  • 1 0
 In the process of making one of mine into a gravel bike!
  • 3 0
 @woofer2609: I normally just carry a second slacker frame on my back, and swap it over for the descents.
  • 2 2
 i just mounted a dorado 180mm on mine (sorry)
  • 8 2
 Is it me or is 465 a pretty long seat tube for a large. I would expect something in the 410-430mm range.
  • 1 0
 Agreed. I also find the ST too long on all sizes.

I am 5'7" (170cm) on a medium Honzo ESD and I really like the 380mm ST. I would't be able to fit a 180mm on a 410mm ST bike and this is a big negative for me. Not necessarily a show-stopper, but close.
  • 2 0
 My S4 (XL) Esker Japhy seattube sits around 470mm and I have a 190mm dropper slammed. At 182cm tall with a fairly short inseam, I often find that I've not bottomed the dropper out, even when dirt jumping it. Plenty low!

That said, I am all for more XL sized options with low slung toptubes. They seem so rare. I wanna know who's 198cm tall and comfy on this rather short Large frame.
  • 4 0
 Bikepacking ethos makes room for a big frame bag, forgets rack mounts.
  • 1 0
 @rider001: oh man, I built it up and legitimately yelled WHAT! when I went to mount my tubus rack to it and noticed the lack of mounts. Can't believe the "do it all" machine needs add-ons to do it all. Really bolstered the idea that my next frame will definitely be custom.
  • 1 0
 Enough to fit a 180-200mm dropper. If you are after scooterish frames have a look at the new marin san quentin.
  • 1 0
 I think the geo makes more sense with an 120mm fork. It would increase reach by 6mm and lower the bb by 5mm. 66 degree ha is still acceptable for a down country bike.
  • 2 0
 I've seen a Bardino on the trails and it's a beautiful frame. Price is reasonable too. Pity about the sizing though, leaves plenty of people out, including myself. Plenty of brands lately start their ht sizes from M (Bird Forge, Starling Roost)
  • 3 0
 Nukeproof do the same with all their 29er bikes - no Small sizes.
  • 3 0
 @paulskibum: But Nukeproof make 27.5 bikesin Small, which is likely their justification, as someone who likes 27.5 I'm just glad they still make pure 27.5 bikes
  • 2 0
 I like the numbers on the geo chart for this one. It's a hardtail, so you want something that is zippy and manageable, that's what this geo is. If you want to plow a straight line down a 40% grade, then buy a full suspension bike.
  • 1 0
 I have their Sardinha 2 frame for bike packing. Very nice bikes indeed with good geo, finishing and price. I wish I had room for another bike so I could get one of these as well. The ordering process was a bit weird as I had to pay for it with a bank transfer rather than a credit card, but everything went through.
  • 3 0
 It’s my 2018 Rootdown! I like this paint job a little more, but I have an older Chromag with old decals.
  • 5 0
 Yay more Hardtail bikes
  • 1 0
 almost went with Norderst before landing on Bird Forge, but their stuff looks awesome.
anyone ride em?
  • 2 0
 How’s the Forge? Looks amazing but the bb height seems crazy low. 10mm lower than my Honzo iirc, and I already find that too low.
  • 5 0
 I have the previous versions, size L and M-L (wife's bike). Switched to Britango from their hardcore Bardino (v1).

Bardino is an awesome bike. Planted, stable, liked it in slow technical jank, the pedal response was awesome. Then I bought a new full sus enduro and did not make sense to have 2 bikes for similar terrain. I was also looking for something more playful and poppy (it was difficult for me to jump on the Bardino) and with growing kids also something for cycling trips, hauling a trailer and mellower terrain.

So I decided to get a Britango. I was lucky enough to find a guy that had a Britango and wanted a Bardino, so we swapped frames, I have lowered the fork travel and put Ikons instead of Butchers.

It was exactly what I wanted. I was immediately able to get more air and I was not being slowed down by chunky tires and on an mellower terrain.

This is my most used bike these days. I take it everywhere except a bike park. From day cycles with kids (seat or trailer) to local trails (both rocky jank and undulating singletrack), pump track (I actually take wife's bike there as it's smaller), learning jumping... It's fun and both Britango and Bardino dampen the chatter a lot.

I don't think I'll be selling the frames ever.

Bought the frames way back for a significantly less though.
  • 3 0
 Had a mk1 Britango for about 1 year. Great geo and overall quality,but way too stiff rear triangle for me and my 67kg at the time. Not the feeling I was expecting from a steel frame. If anyone is thinking about building a frame like the one in the picture and doing a bit of color matching,the DMR Sect grips in mustard yellow match the frame perfectly.
  • 2 0
 I ride a Bardino 1 from time to time, it rides nice and stable. It's a fun ride, but most of the time I prefer to ride my Sentine mostly because of the trails I ride. I'm thinking getting a Nordest Lacrau for the longer and less "bumpy" trails, but the price is stupidly high, if not I would buy one without thinking twice.
  • 2 0
 @scotteh: you know it's interesting . i noticed that too, especially when building. As it started coming together i had it standing on flat ground next to SJ and status, and i was like "woah that seems crazy low". originally had it setup 27.5x3.0 front and 2.8 rear and that obviously made it appear even lower. Rode it once and def was a little low. Switched to 27.5x3.0 and it's been perfect. Yes maybe a touch on a low side when you go thru flat slow speed up and over tech features, but generally much better and don't notice while riding. man i love all these steel choices!
  • 2 0
 @nozes: honestly whenever ordering a steel frame this is my concern. Everyone making claims about their tubes, some using Reynolds some using comparable, some using only compliant stuff for front triangle etcetera, so def good to hear feed back!
  • 1 0
 @metsrangers35: I don't know,but I guess that to meet a price point and the strenght needed to this kind of frames,manufacturers may use 4130 tubing similar to BMX frames?
The Britango's rear triangle is very compact (I loved the short chainstays),which amplifies the rigidity.
  • 1 0
 @metsrangers35: If you want a really compliant steel frame, Production Privee is the answer. Flows like water over the rock gardens.
  • 2 0
 m.pinkbike.com/photo/26156498

m.pinkbike.com/photo/26156499

Here's my Britango,back in June 2020.

I've got a BC Podsol now,despite being aluminum it's way more confortable than the steel framed Britango.
  • 2 0
 @nozes: def a nice looking bike/build, but totally get it. each frame and tube diffrent and sometimes the final product less than sum of the parts.
  • 2 0
 reach is nice on the large, but why seattube so long?
  • 2 0
 So what's the difference between this and a 120-140mm "trail" hardtail...
  • 10 9
 "Downcountry" is a fictional term
  • 4 5
 It has become sentient.......
  • 2 2
 I was just conversing on Discord with my son's friend, a university classics student, who was pointing out that in ancient Greek, you can make a linguistic distinction between matters of fact and opinion. I feel that English would benefit from such a feature when we come to use terms like Downcountry. I'm sure it's a lovely frame though.
  • 4 1
 @The-Foiling-Optimist: Just use the eye roll emoji.
  • 5 1
 As real as the Midwestern mountains.
  • 5 2
 Whereas “enduro” and “all-mountain” have been around for thousands of years…
  • 1 1
 @notthatfast: how does one enduro?
  • 5 1
 Every MTB category didn’t exist was willed into being against the wishes of stogy traditionalists.

“Downhill? In my day we just road mountain bikes!”
  • 2 1
 short and tall. Definitely not downcountry.
  • 1 0
 bring back the 250 and 24"
  • 1 0
 120 mm=DC
140 mm= down downcountry
  • 1 3
 I've never welded a frame together but is it really hard to weld post style brake mounts onto stays? Seems lots of smaller brands use IS instead
  • 7 3
 Strip an IS mount, replace the caliper. Strip a post mount, replace the frame.
  • 10 0
 @sfarnum: no no. You'll only have to replace the brake adapter
  • 2 0
 It is easier and cheaper to laser out an IS mount from plate metal than make a Post Mount attachment. Take a look through the Paragon Machine Works site for some examples $10usd vs $33usd... all these bits add up.
  • 1 0
 PM mounts also need to be welded more precisely, especially on a vertical plane and would ideally be surfaced post prod. That plus the non (or very difficult) repairability of the threads & added manufacturing costs as stated above. PM looks cleaner I agree, Flatmount too if you'd asked me.
  • 6 0
 @sfarnum: I should add this to my saved replies lol
I’d also add that (although there are some very good solutions out there) adding a chunky post mount in steel generally adds a chunk of weight too. Using an alu post mount adapter is lighter and most folks will end up using an adapter anyway, may as well keep the steel element small (IS).
IS suits steel frame construction really well imo.
  • 1 1
 1000% agree.
  • 1 1
 Reached out.
  • 6 0
 Touch Faith?
  • 2 0
 @woofer2609: woofer you da man. If I lived in Canada I’d head over for some brewskies. Throw on Fubar the movie because I already know you know
  • 2 0
 @foxweildingvapeking420: Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.041384
Mobile Version of Website