The idea of cutting a hole in a bike's downtube to fit tools or snacks inside seems to be getting ever more popular. The concept was probably introduced by
Specialized's Stumpjumper Carbon back in 2016 (let me know if you know of an earlier example). Back then, Specialized admitted to a roughly 200 g weight penalty for the system but argued it was worth it for the convenience of having all the essentials on board and ready to go.
Recently, the idea has been picked up by many brands and implemented in both carbon and alloy frames. But in my view, most don't quite match the execution that Specialized pulled off. Some downtube doors are too narrow to get much in - even fishing out an inner tube can feel like a surgical procedure. Others can rattle when a full water bottle is installed onto the cover.
If you only have one bike, having a few essentials permanently in place can be appealing, but if you have multiple it's often a faff to switch them over and make sure you always have everything with you. Putting weight in the frame and out of your pack is certainly a good thing for handling and fatigue in principle, but if you can only fit an emergency tube, a pump and a tire lever, it's not like we're shedding kilos from our shoulders.
Besides, it's not hard to strap such items to the outside of a frame (perhaps in a watertight frame bag) without cutting a hole in the frame. If we are going to store things in the downtube, I'd rather see bespoke water bottles or bladders that slot inside and can be removed for refilling (Specialized does this with the Stumpjumer EVO); that way you could offload a significant amount of weight into the frame and carry enough water for rides that are too long for a single water bottle (anything over 1-2 hours in warm weather).
But what do you think? Is downtube storage a must-have or a gimmick?
but, I'll keep my own bike longer rather than being forced to buy either
It fits two 29” Tubolito spare tubes + Tubolito patch kit, my Fabric 16-in-1 multitool (includes a chain breaker), my Unior cassette remover. This all together including the saddle bag weighs about 350 grams in total.
I find 200 grams for this internal storage space to be ridiculously heavy and to be not worth the weight penalty.
No baguette, cheese and wine bottle storage is a failure for me anyway
Your comment is on the same level of usefulness as Cable Tourism.
But more importantly!
We need lighter bikes!
That we can fill with useful stuff!
Which makes them heavy again!
Therefore we need even lighter bikes!
To fill with even more useful stuff!
And repeat until bored….
I need a lighter belly and to hit the gym more if my bike ever feels heavy.
Stupid argument
Everybody that thinks 1kg on the bike is going to make a significant difference in time has never ridden with a power meter.
Now, if you change tires then you can easily save +20watts in rolling resistance.
A kg in the total weight is not even saving you 5 watts unless you're really really light, which in the MTB community is a rarity.
I would bet that if you ask any of the athletes whether they'd rather have an extra kg with also an extra 10 watts in their legs or stay the same, they would much rather take the extra kg and watts.
Even the women top contenders, where weight would make more of a difference they are nowhere near as skinny as the road cyclists.
However, optimising everything, including weight, rolling resistance, aerodynamics, drivetrain efficiency, etc...will make a difference as a whole.
I would say that the MTB category where weight might make the most difference is XCM.
Weight matters yo
Saving a few seconds on the climb is very, very low down my list of priorities for a bike.
Either way, weight aside, I loved having storage on my stumpy. It wouldn't be a deal breaker, I bought a bike without it, but definitely a tie breaker if I'm torn between bikes.
A pack keeps you honest, you can feel the weight, it allows you to have an educated choice as to how much you carry,
Downriver storage is a thneed.
I also have a pack and a bumbag, since having this bike I’ve only ever used the bumbag.
Could live without it, but really appreciate having it. I always ride with a super-light hip pack, but the downtube storage means I NEVER forget the tube, puncture repair kit (rarely used, but also houses a quick link and some other bits), tubeless sealant topup and a multitool. Both brands came with a little wrap to stop items rattling in the frame.
They're very useful.
Each of my bikes have their own tool kit based on their intended usage, so all of that stuff lives in there full time.
Should a convenience item be considered on how a bike preforms?
I don’t buy the theory that down tubes on bikes are getting bigger so that they look more like e-bikes, but I don’t like the massive down tube look, it’s quite refreshing to see a modern bike with slim tubes.
Then there is the weight issue, bikes are heavier now and these holes cannot help in that department.
Got a bike with it, I use it but would happily not have it. I always take out the bags when I wash the bike as they just get damp. Seen this problem with a lot of other makes.
I have had another bike without it and with a One Up tool and a tube strap been able to hold everything with the addition of a slim hip pack (used for phone, keys and snacks). I still use that with my current bike with storage.
The point I was trying to make was that when a bike is reviewed nowadays if it hasn’t got internal storage it seem like it’s automatically marked down as a con.
Serious question: much easier to access while riding, generally holds more stuff and is removable if you don’t like it or need it…
Pork chops for the win!
Good idea for the next poll: Do you carry emergency TP on your rides?
I personally have not had to use TP, but friends have been thankful that I do. I also carry a lot of zip ties in there. They take up very little room. A friend broke off his shifter and we used 5 of them to secure it in place. worked for the whole day.
I'd be curious to know from an actual frame designer if adding in-frame storage actually impacts total frame weight. Even if it does, it's easily worth 1-2 lbs. for me. I am rather fit and very lean and weigh almost 200 lbs. Doesn't make much different to me if the bike weights 37 vs. 38 lbs. That is a 0.4% difference in system weight, and allows me to do away with a pack or frame bag of any kind.
I know it's off-trend right now, but I much prefer to grab any bike I want, and only need to remember my trusty (and well-stocked) Camelbak.
Not wanted on my XC bike.
So, I technically don't NEED it. But...I'd give up my XC bike before my trail bike at this stage in my life.
But a bottle holder + extra frame storage = no pack for rides under 4hr = bliss
to carry my swag
I've never had a bike with frame storage, and wouldn't seek it on next bike ... who knows, maybe I'm missing out? It seems too small to fit anything useful.
Then I opened the swat door on my new Specialized and realized I could carry what I needed inside and have a sleek bike I could ride with no worries (packless and happy).
The doors (storage) when executed well, keep bikes looking good and keep riders prepared (happy and packless). My most recent bike does not have in bike storage, I wish it did. I now have to mount the pump on the bike and strap a tube with levers to the frame.
If more bike companies made custom bags that fit their bikes, I'd be game, or mounting points for tools/tubes/pumps etc.
Most companies build/design their bikes for the masses. The best companies build their bikes after LISTENING to their customers. The best ideas for bikes are in the heads of the riders, I wish more bike companies would listen to us and produce what we desire not what they are guessing we want.
I do not carry spare tube either.
In case my next bike with internal storage, probably "Dart" and cliff bar will goes in there, however I do not see what else u should carry? tube and pump? maybe more water
short rides - water bottle
long rides - u will not manage with single water bottle so u need some sorta carrier like backpack/bumbag
bike park - water bottle
to me water storage is most essential part of the equation, so in case I can put water pack in in frame storage - count me in
Ive been curious for a while now if those soft flasks would fit in these compartments. If I could find a way to make it work if be keen to give it a go. I like riding without a pack and would rather not bother with bibs too.
I do agree backpacks are a pain, especially for my back.
I dislike the rattling as you have a harder time hearing something coming loose.
DIE headset/steer tube cable routing! Please die!
Cables need to be cut to the correct length, so they won’t be a mess. Almost all new bikes come with cables and hoses way too long. Reading these comments makes clear that someone on the ride brings everything but the kitchen sink.
Bravo!
But for real, with the advent of tire inserts, the prospect of having to pack out a sealant laden insert upon swapping out a tube has turned me off to the idea of carry one at all. Maintain my tire sealant, run a few more psi’s, carry a plug or two on longer rides. I’ll ride out on a cracked rim before I throw a tube in.
On my current MY 21 Epic Evo, I have to resort to the XC lunchbox and a pump mount. Hurts the eyes something fierce, but not having a backpack killing/heating up my back as well as being able to ride in a loose t-shirt is worth that trade-off.
Probably not enough to throw out my current EE, though - still enjoying it way too much.
I also remember a multitool (Maybe I'm wrong, and it was a snowboard tool?), that included a small one-hitter referred to in the product description as a "420 ventilator"
Want? Yesh
Storage for extra water etc is INVALUABLE.
Never been a spesh fanboy but their frame storage is awesome.
It’s a win win.
interesting…
I ride an Intense Tracer and there's no "BB AREA STORAGE" option.
500$ price increase: ❌
www.toolbar.store
But, I could wear the same pack as you, and have even more water / tools for a backcountry ride in the frame! Win win.
Only a pussy if there is downside. This is all upside baby!
Now don't be a scrotum and put all that weight on your back because you're so big and tough and impressive.