Descending A paradoxical little machine, the SB135. Small wheels are supposed to be slower, yet it
feels fast. They're twitchier and easier to turn, but somehow you can still get things to calm down at speed. Turns out, a bike is a bike, and this little Yeti is a very fun one. From a geometry standpoint, the SB135 isn't exactly cutting edge, but if you've been riding long enough to have adapted to the shape of bikes 10 years ago, you'll quickly remember that there can be quite a bit of fun in swinging off the back of a smaller bike and making it work.
Sizing plays a critical roll here, as I've been spending time on the size Large, with a relatively short 475mm reach. I could just as easily get along with the XL's 505mm length, but that would take away some of the spunky nature of the bike, biasing instead towards overall stability. If I were trying to race this bike for some reason, I'd probably go with the bigger frame, but that's really not the SB135's purview.
What the smaller bike does offer is a tight wheelbase that slots nicely into corners of all sizes, pumps effectively anywhere on trail, and catches backside in a way that longer and bigger bikes may not be able to. Many of the trails I regularly ride were built deep in the prehistoric era of the triple chainring, so modern wheelbase numbers and wheel sizes were hardly considered when constructing features. That rarely poses a problem, given how capable modern bikes have become, but the SB135 provides a very cool sensation that I haven't felt on some of those bigger sleds: the perfect two-wheeled backside. Smaller undulating features and one-off bits of tech suddenly offered an opportunity to generate a bit more speed, thanks to the shorter wheelbase and smaller wheels. Obviously there's a tradeoff when you encounter a feature that's more significant, but that pumptrack feeling is one that kept me keen to ride the Yeti on more and more of the local trails I know well.
I found the SB135 to be very easy to ride, especially if you have an active style on the bike, moving machine and body around to make the most of the trail ahead. The additional feedback you get from the smaller wheels and tighter numbers just goads you on to mess around even more, turning mundane sections of trail into a hoot and a holler.
All this talk of fun and exciting handling has to reach its limit at some point, and the SB135 does a good job of letting you know when you've hit that ceiling. Over the course of long rides that ranged into gnarlier terrain, I found that the Yeti found its limits before I did, in steep and janky terrain where you're fighting to stay in control of the bike anyway. It's very easy to change direction and pick smaller patches of lines, but the smaller wheels and tighter geometry can get pinged out of your desired path quite easily if you're not on point.
Though the handling gives less room for error than a big truck of an enduro bike might, the suspension performance remains impressive through thick and thin. The team at Yeti did a great job of packaging the smooth and predictable feel of the Switch Infinity system into the smaller travel bracket. Grip is plentiful and support seems to be there whenever you want it on trail. This is a tricky sensation to describe, but the bike manages to pump in a way that feels efficient, while still absorbing the bumps and chatter along the way.
The harder-hitting parts spec of the Lunch Ride kit is key to some of the mannerisms I've come to enjoy on the SB135, with stronger brakes, more fork travel, and burlier wheels all playing a critical role in the end product. If you're really trying to make the most of mellower trails, then the standard spec might be enough, but for those with more serious steeps and features, the LR kit does push the Yeti a bit closer to the capability of bigger bikes on the market.
Again, there are cheaper bikes that perform a similar level, with less maintenance.
20hrs is 20hrs but if you get unlucky with a bit of grit in past the seal, it becomes a lapping paste and destroys it so fast.
If you've been lucky enough not to have this experience like 80% of other yeti riders, great! But if not you must be wearing rose tinted glasses still and unable to admit it's a high maintenance bike
When I get new bearings I pull the seals and add a higher quality grease to the bearings
Unless you do shit for regular maintenance. Then I guess you should be on a hardtail.
Must be my shit maintenance skills ey?
But then you spin that infinity link bearing and it doesn't move... There's a reason they've updated the design and it's not because customers are having a fantastic experience with it, let's agree on that?
So...you're saying he's the Ed McMahon of Yeti threads?
Oh well. What people buy doesn’t always come down to bang for the buck. This bike must hold some kind of value for certain people — maybe it’s brand recognition, maybe it’s the beautiful aesthetics. I don’t know what it is, but people think whatever it is they’re paying is worth it because Yeti isn’t changing its business model.
You can get a Ventana Alpino with custom powdercoat AND custom geometry for less than this. It's not suitable for use by dentists, though.
And/or gna get a spesh 50% off the yeti.
Would I pay $9,500 for this Yeti? No, but I also wouldn't pay $6,500 or $7k for a GG.
1) The front triangles are fully modular, so you can swap a small amount of parts to change the character of the bike significantly. Seatstays, shock, reach adjust, and headset cups to MX frames. One triangle's end use could be very different from another's.
2) Their website is simple to navigate. Ordering replacement parts such as bearing kits involves zero guess work, with reasonable prices, and shipping on short lead times.
Are carbon rear triangles really worth it? That's where I find my frames take the most impact from rocks, chain slap, shoe rub, etc.
If they made a high-pivot frame, would their axle path be more acceptable?
If I had a Gnarvana that I rode 80% of the time, it would be the extreme exception rather than the norm that I would want to switch fork, wheelset, stack height, etc. for a big weekend pedal mission. It's a cool idea in theory, but I would rather just have a second bike ready to go at any time, rather than having a downcountry wheelset and trail fork sitting around waiting for me to have the energy to rebuild my bike for a ride.
Every manufacturer has a decent website these days. I can go order replacement parts for my Evil, Norco, or Revel super easily.
Are carbon triangles really worth it? Not sure I have the data set to definitively say either way (and not even sure carbon bicycles are worth it). However it is telling to me that GG did make a carbon rear triangle for the Pistol (I think it was) and then market it as if it was better, while leaving the rest of their bikes with a 50% rear carbon triangle and 50% alloy rear triangle.
And if their claims of thermoplastic being X% stronger than alloy really are true, then worry about damage (over alloy) should be a null point.
Value is truly irrelevant to some people, that’s who’s buying these. The $ value doesn’t matter as much to them. I know because I’m one of them, although even I’m not an Sworks customer anymore. Literally buy a frame and build a better “Sworks” spec for far less. It’s always been that way, but the disparity seems way more now.
But seriously. A 10-15k bike per year isn’t even a blink to many people. Downvote all you want it’s just the reality. Where I live $104,000.00 per year is considered low income. It’s f*cking nuts.
At this point in the modern MTB world, you would be a fool to pay the premium for Yeti.
All that said, at the current pricing, I wouldn't buy another Yeti. I love my bike dearly, but there are too many other good options that come in at much more reasonable price points.
As we are learning from bizarre experiments like the Raised Reverse Stem - higher stack height can really instill a confidence inducing and more "upright" starting position for descending.
Because it turns out dopamine doesn't really help you enjoy things, it just makes you want to do things again, which is often extrapolated to mean "must have enjoyed it if you want it again".
No thanks at that overinflated price.
I saw 6k off some trek e bikes yesterday and if that's yr thing, Forestal e bikes in aus$ half price lol literally 10k off on sale.
I paid 4.000 euros ,like rest of Stock
In web Online
I Know Yeti you paid Brand also to.
But just first Ride and Feels the diference to any trail Bikes i tried
You can afford more than you expect.
Nice to read all You
I feel so bad for people who need a certain bike to "goad them into messing around".
Because electronic shifting lines up so well with the lunch-ride philosophy: "Hey, quick, lets get in a few laps at lunch time. No pack, no chamois, just helmet and shred!" "Shit, I can't: my shifting battery needs a charge."
Figured yeti would have come out with the next gotta have widget by now. Switch infinity is not really uh viable for the mass market.
nope
I'm not saying frame storage is a dealbreaker - but once you have it it's really nice. Considering how many companies offer this, it is becoming what should be a "standard" feature. Especially when you are charging $10k+ for a bike.
I hope this inspires other companies as well to build more such bikes again.
LR has a close to perfekt geo in my book.
You should have made it a SB145 with a higher stack, though.
My cudos go to Yeti aside from the price. I know, that is difficult to overlook. But there is not much left in that department, although there should be more choices.
A Pivot is nearly as expensive with outdated geo and a Trek Fuel frame would be 4800 bucks where I live (and that has a fairly low stack although it is a 29er).
In my experience 29 is better in most situations but there are some situations where 27.5 is more fun.
The extra fun is worth it for me.
Okay here goes:
Location, location, location. Trail bikes like this are awesome in certain areas.
Where I live, the San Francisco Bay Area, most of the trails are old hiking trails that are tight and Twisty. Big travel bikes can’t really get going to fast and most of the features feel muted by all the extra travel. It essentially feels like you’re “road biking” on dirt.
Bellingham, on the other hand, has most mostly new trails that where made for big travel bikes. Up there the reviewer will think the bike is not very good. Much like Levy was crapping on the Mojo 4 when they tested it in Squamish.
So I recently got a mojo 4 and it’s a lot more fun to ride ( although slower) than my old mojo HD3. It’s like riding a new version of an old mountain bike: it can do all the things. It can climb, pedal along rolling sections, hit small jumps, and descend too. More importantly, it lets me go outside and ride all day long, without getting tired out. That’s a huge win for me.
Your mileage may vary…
I think the bike is gorgeous personally...just wish it had more travel...and bigger wheels...and a different suspension design, lol.