Michelin have slowly been expanding their mountain bike range in both directions, and the line now includes everything from heavy duty e-MTB options to featherweight cross-country tires. Lately, they've come into the spotlight with success under freeriders like Carson Storch and Cam Zink, to name a few, as well as the GT Factory Racing and MS Mondraker gravity teams. We've even noticed
certain teams blacking out their tires for specific conditions, which says a lot when top racers choose them without any obligations.
Wild Enduro Racing Line DetailsWheel Sizes: 29"
Width: 2.4"
Casings: 4-ply, Down Hill Shield
Compound: Magi-X DH
Weight: 1459 g - front, 1350 g - rear (actual)
Price: $106.99 USD each
More info: Michelin Tires You may recognize these treads from the Wild Enduro series, but the flashy blue and yellow hot patches dictate the "Racing Line" version, which are feature laden with technologies designed for the rigours of downhill, e-MTB and enduro racing. This means the tougher carcasses weigh in at some 150-grams more than the "Gravity Shield" casing that has been around for some time. At the moment, the Wild Front / Rear Racing Line combo is only available in a 29" x 2.4" option and their weights measured 1459 and 1350 grams, respectively.
Bomber 4-ply protection in a foldable, yet firm casing with tacky Magi-X DH rubber.
Design & ConstructionAnother brand, another round of tire nomenclature to decipher. This time, Michelin has brought together the compound, support, and puncture resistance of their downhill tire construction while borrowing the tread patterns previously found on the lighter-duty Wild Enduro options. All of the blue and yellow Racing Line tires use the Magi-X DH compound, which feels a lot like Five Ten's Stealth rubber - it's firm, yet tacky.
You could mistake the Wild Enduro Front for a mud-spike, and it's not far off of that. It's designed to be versatile in all conditions and clear debris. While the Wild Enduro Rear features a similar shoulder knob, the grip down the center of the tire is optimized to restore rolling resistance. Michelin's star-rating scale places the rear tread in this pair as the faster wearing tire due to the amount of time it will take to burn through the shorter center blocks.
Construction technologies include a "Down Hill Shield" aimed to deter sidewall tears and a 4-ply "Double Defence" layer. Along the top is sheath of high density puncture protection to ward off sharp objects that may find themselves landing between the tread blocks. Additionally, the sidewalls feature a reinforcement that tapers upwards from the bead along the sidewall to prevent pinch flats and add stability under low pressures.
Performance INSTALLATIONThe Wild Enduros tires were installed on Bontrager Line 30 Carbon wheels without much wrestling or the need for any tire levers, despite the rim's protective plastic strip that can make other tires difficult to fit. The tires popped into the seat at pressures around 30 psi with just a standard pump. Some folded tires can lose air like a leaking sieve, but that wasn't the case with either Wild Enduro, even after two more swaps to different wheelsets.
In terms of sizing, I took the hot tip to leave the tires inflated at a higher pressure of 45 psi for twenty-four hours to allow them to fully stretch out to their full capacity. After that, both the front and rear, despite its smaller appearance, measured at 2.4" wide across the casing and 2.5" from edge to edge.
TRACTION & CORNERINGImmediately, the effort required to turn these tires over on pavement due to the weight and tacky compound is noticeable. You can feel the tank track-like tread turn over knob by knob; granted, testing primarily took place through the back half of a damp and cold autumn.
A quick rip down a concrete stairs set revealed the high level of damping that both the slow rebounding rubber and thick casing provided, even on a 24 kg eMTB. That squared-off, open tread and supportive casing did look promising once things pointed downhill on trail though.
After the first outing in a mix of sloppy organic dirt and slime covered bedrock, you could have fooled me if you said these Wild Enduros were filled with tire inserts. The grip levels were adequate with pressures close to what I would run on a bike without the extra heft of a motor; 23 psi in the front tire, 26 psi in rear, but the support was next level. I incrementally lowered the pressures over the course of two laps and my confidence in the security of the casing and traction of the tread grew.
Typically, a tire with such an open tread doesn't perform well on bedrock or roots, but the Wild Enduros were predictable in those scenarios. The front carries similar mud-shedding qualities to the Schwalbe Magic Mary, however, finding the shoulder knobs was an easier task. There is a ton of bite in those shoulder knobs and when the right pressures are found the casing is stable and doesn't feel flimsy. They are savage diggers when you get them on edge in soft terrain.
That does mean you need to lean marginally harder to corner on hard-packed dirt. They're consistent when you steer the bike, but they do have an earlier breaking point. Compared to something like a Maxxis Minion DHF on the same 30mm rims, you need patience in firmer soil, letting the shoulder knob touch down and weighting the lug to slightly depress into the casing. Only then you can push further into the turn, otherwise you may start to slide if you're overzealous.
Transitioning from the center to the shoulder knob on the rear tire is not as drastic as a full semi-slick. You do have to pay attention when trail braking because the rear tire can cake up with organic earth occasionally. For adverse weather, Michelin does suggest doubling up on Wild Enduro Fronts and using it on the rear wheel for really mucky conditions.
Martin Maes did just that during the La Thuille EWS, but I never found the need to try this option, given the amount of grit in the soil on the North Shore. The grip on the front wheel was able to handle the majority of the hard braking, while the Wild Rear stayed consistent enough and allowed me to perceive troublesome places where it might break free momentarily. I would happily take whatever relief from the faster, lower tread on the rear tread I can get.
Firm, heavy, slow, tacky, open, mixed rear tread - who are they good for? E-bikers, riders who flat frequently, and those who frequent demanding trails with easygoing vertical access. They conform much better when it's warm, like most other tires, but the Wild Enduro Racing Line in particular are firm enough to support heavy loads at low pressures without the carcass or tread wiggling around.
At slower speeds on a traditional bike, with final pressures hovering around 18 psi in the front and 22 out back, they do seem over-damped. The harsh sensation is amplified by the cold weather and can impede you from going forwards over stutter bumps. I even had to alter my suspension settings by dropping some spring force and opening the damper to compensate for this. As a constant tinkerer, I do wonder what a slightly larger volume might do to overcome this trait. The four-ply, burly carcass could be the one mountain bike component to have a
minimum weight limit.
DURABILITY There is something to be said for their durability, though. "I haven't flatted yet" are famous last words, but I have faith that I could roll out on the Wild Enduro Racing Line tires with zero pressure and still make it home in time for dinner anyways.
So far, all the knobs have worn evenly - they're just starting to show signs of wear, but none of them have left unexpectedly yet. There are signs of the lugs on the rear tire starting to crack slightly along the base of the outer edge. That's nothing out of the ordinary for the amount of aggressive riding they have been subjected to, although the brutality of multiple days in a bone dry bike park might say otherwise.
They've also retained their shape just fine after a few installs and there was one horrendous case on a sizeable, log-framed gap jump. Not only did the tire survive, but it didn't lose any air or show any signs of the impact. No rims were harmed during this test session, thankfully.
WEIGHT A friend jokingly inquired about how these "car tires" performed on the trail. I wasn't sure that was a reference to the brand's history or if he had tuned into the weight penalty incurred by the Racing Line duo. Michelin is transparent and lists the weights for all of their mountain bike tires, which is something that cannot be said for some products known to tip the scales. The front weighed in at 1459 grams, a little more than the 1400 grams claimed number. Meanwhile, the rear was bang on the stated number of 1350 grams, nearly the exact same weight as the equivalent 29" casing options of a 2.4" Schwalbe Magic Mary.
It is what it is, so if you're worried about weight and don't need the durability, Michelin offers other Wild Enduro Front and Rear tires with a Gravity Shield that are roughly 150-grams less per end.
PRICE Price aside, it's unlikely you will be tossing out a slashed Michelin Racing Line tire after one ride. Listed at $99 USD, this combo is in line with other top end choices for World Cup and Enduro World Series competitors where the trade off for high wear to all-out traction is foremost. A 3CG Maxxis Assegai hovers around a similar dollar figure and wears at a similar rate, based on my experience between these tires.
Pros
+ Versatile tread patterns work in a variety of conditions
+ Extremely supportive casing, great for e-bikes
+ Front tire is consistently grippy and predictable
Cons
- Support comes at a high weight penalty
- Magi-X DH compound is painfully slow-rolling
- They can feel over-damped and harsh, especially in colder temperatures
Pinkbike's Take | In terms of grip, MIchelin's tacky and slow rebounding Magi-X DH rubber is all about traction, not rolling speed. That means the Wild Front tread pattern is predictable and surefooted on a variety of surface, while the shorter center blocks of the Wild Rear offer a decent amount of grip in the slop, but best suits drier conditions.
As for the construction, lighter riders in cool climates should steer towards other options from Michelin that won't burden them down and will conform to trail surfaces without harsh feedback. The robust four ply casing requires more effort to rotate and manipulate, best suiting e-MTBs, high speed bike parks, or for riders who want to forget about flats.— Matt Beer |
BTW, how many ads for Beta do you see posing as articles in the news feed since this post?
So, yeah. It's just not working out. I wish you the best in future comment section duels.
Tires on the car: $65/ea
Priorities: Questionable
$106 MTB tires are like Sumitomo all-season tires: better than the cheapo tires, but not amazing.
If you can get them, current Michelin mtb tires are f*cking fantastic. Be honest with the conditions you ride and tire model selection, and they will reward you.
I got a set of 27.5 wild enduros (not race line), Magi-X front and Gum-x rear last summer and totally fell in love. So much speed and traction. Got the 29er versions, both Gum-X since couldn't find a Magi-x front, for my new bike and they have been great too. I do a long steep road climb from my house to ride local trails and they aren't a problem.
I will definitely get a pair of these to use for my races this summer, if I can find any.
I got a DH 22 barely used for cheap and it is the best tire I test by far for pure grip downhill.
I switched over to Michelin to give them a try after getting so frustrated with Maxxis, due to tyres leaking and failing, and sidewalls not holding up...
And to my surprise this is what I found:
- I destroyed 5 sets of Maxxis in 1500kms. Michelin I was getting 800-900kms per set
- Every ride I would need to reinflate the Maxxis to ensure I had the correct pressure. Michelin's I'd done over 400kms before I first needed to reinflate to maintain the correct pressure for every ride
- I tore the bead off the sidewall on 3 of the rear Maxxis (I was running DD casings). Have not had this happen yet with Michelin.
- I was was struggling to get the sweet spot pressure wise with the Maxxis DD casings holding the tyre shape (folding over) in high load corners vs being too jarry, loosing traction at the pressure needed for they tyre not to fold. I even tried Cush cores, which didn't make a lot of difference
- Michelin enabled me to drop 3 psi from the lowest pressure I could run with Maxxis and the Michelin would hold shape in the same corners I was having trouble with. And this was without cush cores in the Michelin
- Because of a combination of the above (ability to hold shape and thus give more confidence) and the huge traction the Michelin provide over the Maxxis my average track times dropped by between 3-4 seconds depending on length of the trail
- I tried Assegai and DHR 2s and a variety of their compounds to try get it to the bottom of it with Maxxis. I guess it just the life span of Maxxis, which I suppose helps them sell more tyres??
- I also tried the Vittoria eMazza before the Michelin for another option to try and get to the bottom of the quality, durability, shape, and wear issues. They were on par with Maxxis
- The edge of the tread blocks of the Michelin wouldn't chop out as quickly as the Maxxis either
- Yes the Michelin are heavy, but they definitely make up for the weight
So overall Michelin has given me more confidence, lowered my tire costs and given me more time riding. I'm running the DH34 racelines front is 23psi, rear 25psi
I've been running the original Wild Enduros, then DH34's and my latest bike came with DD Maxxis so I thought I'd give them another shot.
I lasted exactly 2.5 rides before I flatted in a pretty unassuming rock garden.
Overall grip was the similar but felt vague in comparison, the Michy's give way more cornering bite and confidence.
They weigh more in the beginning but I guarantee the last Maxxis tyre I wore the tread down on weighed more at the end of its life because of all the patches I had to install inside!
The Michelin DH16 was the best DH tire out there back in the day. Unfortunately they stopped producing them in like 2009 or so. I always wanted to try their newer ones, but every one who rode them said they were trash... plus I didn't like the new profile and the names were kinda shit too. Worst marketing ever.
It's a shame they stopped producing the DH16, because I would've never run a different tire ever again. It was better than HR2 or the old Kaiser back in the day. Very durable, great control and breaking grip, hardly ever got a flat.
Freakin’ only place I can get 24” DHFs & DHRs for my kid…
Thanks for the heads up! The Slaughter and eliminator are about $16 on their website too
My current set of car tires cost EUR 460.- while my current set of bike tires was EUR 100.-
Better casings
Better grip
Lower rolling resistance
Better wear characteristics
Wild Enduro FRONT Gum-X is about as grippy as an Arseguy MaxxGrip but rolls faster, wears a lot slower and the casings last until the tread has worn out.
These are the first tyres I have ever run that will last for 900-1000 km and grip almost as well on Day 30 as they did on Day Two.
I agree Michelin appears to have gone absent for several years (2005 - 201 but they are back with some outstanding tyres now.
- superb grip everywhere ( except maybe super hardpack)
- decent rolling
- super damping
- completely true ( unlike most maxxis and e13 tires)
- easy sealing
- good in the cold ( maxxis is still crap below 0)
The new 2.4 SG weights 1400g though. The tire is already in the schwalbe lineup and even was on the bike of a female EWS racer. Coming out probably 2023.
Haven't tried assegai yet, never found minions anything special in my applications
My motto right now is: don't skid and brake less... so I save brake pads and keep my tyres longer
But I guess in this day and age, you take what you can get. I have DH34s mounted on my bike park/enduro racing wheelset and I run AM2 Wilds and Forces on my trail/daily driver wheelset.
Michelin also makes a slightly less burly casing’d 3x33tpi tire in both gum-x 3c and magi-x 3c.
Magi x lugs are a lot stiffer than gumx, i’ve heard from harder riders than myself that you really have to be pushing it to get good performance and ride feel out of magix.
Wonder if they’ll do a more dry conditions version.
When they’re available
only available in. 29”
A little more than
a little expensive
There I fixed it for ya
& also not available anywhere.
Lucky me a bike has only 2 wheels.
The Pinkbike as I first got to know it, was a goofy mountain bike news and review source with a mostly unmoderated comments section and an unhealthy addiction to “bro-science”. I loved it, and I have read articles nearly every day since I discovered the site. That all changed one fateful day in November 2021, when Radek Burkat announced that he had sold Pinkbike to Outside, after running the site mostly by himself for 23 years. Now, to most people that would be no big deal, but to us, the loyal readers and commenters of Pinkbike, this was the beginning of the end. The Pinkbike community immediately started to immigrate to other rival websites such as Vital MTB, and NSMB. I and other Pinkbike community members immediately realized this was not an isolated incident. In early 2021, Bike MAG went under, and the rights and former employees were bought out by Outside Inc. Again, in early 2021 Outside Inc. bought Backpacker magazine, also in early 2021, Outside Inc. acquired Gaia GPS, and Big Stone Publishing (Publisher of Rock and Ice, Trail Runner, Ascent, Gym Climber, and other popular publications) in late 2020. As many have pointed out, It feels less like Outside Inc. is trying to expand it’s audience, and more like it is trying to gain a monopoly over North American outdoor publications, especially since they are buying up not just one mountain bike-related website, but several.
This is a problem for several reasons. Most notably, they have put most of these publications behind some sort of paywall, contradicting their so-called “mission” to expand the outdoor community to those less privileged. They hold an overwhelming amount of sway within the outdoor media ranks, allowing them to push their agenda out to the multitudes with little to no competition; they hold the power of the majority, which is bad. Outdside Inc. is also known for drawing attention to little-known and local secret spots, increasing the amount of traffic these fragile ecosystems must endure. In many cases, the quality of the content put out by these websites and magazines owned by Outside Inc. drops dramatically and often skews more toward ads and consumerism, than the tips, tricks, stories, and reviews the publications were originally known for.
When Outside Inc. forces a previously free website to put up a paywall under the guise of making more “quality content”, and promising that most content will remain free, but reduces the quality of that content to shameless ads, clickbait, and links to other websites that just happen to be behind paywalls, it at least makes everyone feel a little unwelcome, and at worst blocks people’s access to getting outside by withholding those unwilling or unable to pay’s access to the very thing that might inspire them to get outside. Getting outside is expensive enough with gear purchases and travel, so making paywalls on an online place has to be the worst type of gatekeeping in an otherwise open to beginners industry (one could even argue that the outdoor industry is driven by excited beginners). So, if the whole point of buying up outdoor publications is to get more people outside, then putting everything behind a paywall is definitely not the way to go about it. At this point, it appears that Outside Inc. is only in this to make money, not to inspire people, or even to provide quality content, and one might point out that Pinkbike thrived as an entirely free website for 20+ years, so no one can say that it can’t be done.
Monopolies on entire industries are banned throughout most of the world for many good reasons. But even owning a large number of publications or companies in a given industry should prompt further investigations into the buyer’s intentions. Especially in an industry as important to the future of our planet as the outdoor industry. The best way to get people to care about something is to show them it’s value, so getting people to experience nature outside of going for a walk in the park is integral to our future. I am not sure of Outside Inc.’s intentions but I do think that they have a dangerous ability to control the opinions of many consumers through the types of content the publications under them produce. If the free copy of Outside magazine (Outside Inc.’s flagship publication) I received with my latest Backpacker magazine is anything to go by, the content they produce leans heavily in favor of loosely concealed advertisements and not concealed at all advertisements for expensive trips. Worse yet, the new version of “tips and tricks”, at least as far as Outside Inc. is concerned is revealing local secret spots.
Take Hanging Lake, a beautiful, blue, and very fragile ecologically unique lake at the top of a short but steep one-mile hike just off of I-70 in Colorado. It was relatively unknown until the advent of geotagging on Instagram (a feature which allows users to add the location where a picture was taken to their post). Hanging Lake rapidly exploded, and visitation increased exponentially. People began to disobey the no swimming signs, and the fragile lake was put in peril. Officials were forced to implement a permit and shuttle system to protect the lake before it was ruined. That is one instance I know of, but there are others, and most of them aren’t being caused by Instagram. They are being caused mostly (but not exclusively) by publications owned by Outdside Inc., and most of these hidden gems do not have the same amount of protection available as Hanging Lake did. The added traffic at these previously rarely walked trails will eventually cause irreparable damage to the environment around them, especially if the infrastructure around them cannot be maintained enough to accommodate the increased traffic.
Perhaps the most trivial of these reasons is the quality of the content produced, but that does not make it irrelevant. The quality content I and many others are used to on Pinkbike, and other publications are quickly becoming a thing of the past. For instance, Pinkbike generally does a goofy year-in-review, in which they reveal the best comments, most read articles, best new products, and most interesting racing team moves. That did not happen this year, and was instead replaced with a couple of measly articles about 2021 as a whole. This is not an isolated incident, my Backpacker magazines are becoming ever shorter, yet are filled with more ads than ever (and I pay for that one). Instead the vast majority of the quality content we are used to has and likely will continue to dwindle in favor of shameless ads and vacation giveaways, and I just have to point out that Outside Inc. is listed as a retail company, not a media outlet, and is owned by a ghost (all you can find out about the dude is his name).
I will miss having goofy and weird outdoor publications to read, but most of all I will miss the small website feel of Pinkbike. It used to feel like a tight-knit community, I mean everyone knew who the wackjobs were in the comments, and they got tagged and downvoted all the time. Now, where will we go to get our fill of bad puns, and out-of-place comments? I for one am in favor of a new MTB website called Purplebike, but for now, I’ll eventually stop reading Pinkbike altogether, and spend ever more time on NSMB. I hope this has shed some light on Outside Inc. and the impact it has, and maybe it will even cause you to cancel your Outside+ subscription
Sincerely,
Supergirl56
You have lots of time to start up PurpleBike. Get at it. And when Amazon comes knocking on the door to write you a check for some insanely outrageous unjustifiable amount, we better be seeing you say 'No thanks'.
many
words
will there be a video or podcast?
TLDR: Big corp bad. Grr.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if every publication could be entirely independent, but there are merits to having a larger organization around journalistic publications.