Descending Even with a 170mm fork the Tyee's geometry is fairly middle-of-the road for this style of bike. It's not super long and slack, or overly steep and short. I'd describe its trail manners as energetically neutral - it's peppy enough to get airborne off smaller obstacles without a struggle, but the overall handling feel is calm and balanced. I never felt like I had to fight to place it where I wanted, no matter whether I was picking my way through jumbles of pointy rocks in Pemberton, or logging some air time in Whistler.
Compared to the Commencal SX that we tested last year, another mixed wheel bike in this travel bracket, the Tyee doesn't require as much effort to manuever, likely due to the steeper head angle and shorter reach, figures that give it a 20mm shorter wheelbase.
Some of the extra-efficient feel that the Tyee demonstrated on the climbs bleeds over onto the descents, where it's not quite as beneficial. It can handle big hits with ease, and it has a nicely planted feel when touching back down to earth, but this is a bike that feels more poised than plush – it doesn't have ton of sensitivity at the beginning of its travel. I experimented with running more sag, and ran a SuperDeluxe coil shock for a while, but no matter the setting the Tyee never transformed into a plush, ultra-sensitive machine.
The Tyee's flip chip is mainly designed to allow the use of a 29” or 27.5” rear wheel while preserving the geometry, but it can also be used to create slack and very low option – with a 170mm fork the head angle drops to 63.2 degrees, and the bottom bracket feels like it's hovering just above the ground.
I took a handful of laps in the Whistler Bike Park with the Tyee in configuration and found it to be very enjoyable on high speed jump trails. The increased stability is noticeable, and the low bottom bracket height made it even easier to push into tall bermed turns. The downsides to the setting become evident almost immediately when venturing into more technical terrain – with 170mm cranks I had a number of semi-scary pedal strikes. I'd say that it's a usable option, but shorter cranks are highly recommended unless you're content to always coast on technical trails.
Cable Tourism is a hard/fast "no buy" for myself, and seemingly many other people with wallets.
And I spread the knowledge wherever I can.
A buddy of mine just pinged me a few days ago about help deciding which bike to buy, and one of them was the Tyee. My first question was "which model year ", because I know he doesn't do any of his own maintenance.
Turns out it was a 2022 model (barely used), so it wasn't applicable, but his first response when I explained why I had checked, was "why on earth would a brand do that".
So yeah, people care when they know.
Headset cable routing: go back home. We told ya so.
But to be honest, propain's routing isn't that much worse than all the other manufacturers' internal routing. I've had a cane creek 40 on my banshee spitfire for the last ten seasons with no need to replace it. I have changed brakes a couple of times, and it sure is nice cutting zip ties instead of cutting the line, fishing it through, and doing an extra bleed. I wish all manufacturers ran the rear brake completely external like Banshee used to and Transition still does.
Outside of the routing drama, first ride on the bike was amazing. I was quite picky in my selection, hoping to find something that performs great from xc epics to chairlift dh, and I think I made the right choice.
You're lucky, or maybe just live/ride where its dry?
I'm in the PNW, and ride a lot in the wet. My Banshee Titans Banshee branded headset made it about a year before going all creaky, and thats with popping the seals and adding waterproof grease, and adding some over the top.
I popped in a Cane Creek Hellbender 70, and we'll see how long that lasts.
And at no time during that installation did I think "OH MAN, I wish I could have had to bleed the brakes now too!".
I can only assume the same applies for carbon framed bikes...
Try to elaborate an intelligent thought... if you can.
I love too, inbred
Nope.
so timeless
For comparison, I struggled with support on a Specialized Enduro and a DPX2 shock (170mm rear travel with 60mm stroke... ~2.83:1 LR)
Any thoughts?
I’m surprised they don’t use a 60mm for 160
Propane is highly compressible.
Not me, though. I'm happier with cables.
Otherwise it looks like a great bike - and the cheaper Formula suspension could be really good.
The Mod shock works really well and the soft CTS valve could address your observation about the firm ride feel @mikekazimer
Nomad for $8400
Tyee for $6830
I'm no math teach but that's enough to buy your buddy a hardtail. What is Propain's side business?? Propane?
There is no margin for the middle man, the local bikeshop.
DTC brands are almost always considerably cheaper than brick-and-mortar brands.
PS @mikekazimer "energetically neutral" is top notch terminology.
I've ridden many bikes over the last couple of years to find what i like, Longer reach bikes sure go down fast fire roads well. but on trail that 475-480 reach is spot on, couple it with longer CS and its golden.
430ish for S 450ish for M 470ish for L and so on with proper stack is the optimum.
I was Preaching about long reach for ages, untill i went back the other way a little... i went from a Large Slash at 488 to a Rocky altitude at about 475 ish - Other than the rocky's suspension being waaay better the position on that bike was excellent, you could move around on it so much more - i recently picked up a giga frame and built it, 475 reach, feels so damn good.
Last weekend i rode a friends Meta with 490 reach, I was so stretched out it was hard to do anything sensible except the plow trails at the bike park.( we swapped bikes, hes the same height) - hes now selling it for a bike with less reach.
Many brands have relaxed their Reaches a little (especially in L) that doesnt happen "just because"
But again I always see you gearing for an arguement in comments so im sure youll tell me and the bike industry they are wrong.
ALL of these creak. All of them and it is awful. I am baffled how they dont find this out during testing. Very skeptical of this headset even without the cable routing, because I will avoid plastic headsets (mainly acros) at all costs...
"Dear (xxx),
Thank you for sending us your brand new xxxxx bicycle. We will test it thoroughly and write an honest review. When reviewing the geometry chart for this model, we noticed a few missing essential values. Can you please provide us with the following numbers for all available sizes, so we can include them in our review article:
-Actual seat tube angle
-Maximum dropper post insertion depth
-......
Kind regards, the Pinkbike technical editors"
The Tyee lacks 1-2 inches of insertion depth - even with its seat tube being around 1 inch to tall.
It also shows that for this bike, the seat tube length is only relevant for short people that want to run short posts.
Are we NOT gonna talk about how one commentator said "The British community is dreaming about Danny Hart winning his 1st set of rainbow strips"... 1:45:40 look it up
UDH is a frame interface with 2 options total:
1. Run sram transmission that has the UDH frame interface on the derailleur body
2. Run a UDH hanger for standard derailleurs (anything that is not transmission).
What @mikekazimer said was that implementing UDH on frames before transmission was announced guaranteed future compatibility - which is exactly what they did.
Read up