The Gambit, Specialized's new lightweight full-face helmet, was designed to satisfy the safety needs of the modern mountain biker. Available in four unobtrusive colors, the futuristic looking helmet caters to more than just one rider category with full downhill certification, MIPS SL, eyewear stowage, and a quick release buckle, all in a ventilated 640 gram package.
Enduro trails and the speeds we ride them at are infringing on what used to be reserved for downhill bikes, and with the increasing number of eMTBs riders can find themselves in that zone more frequently. Carrying these features for such little burden poses the question, "Why not wear a full-face all the time?"
Specialized Gambit Details • 18 vents
• Breakaway visor
• MIPS SL
• Weight (size M): 640g
• Sizes: S, M, L
• Colors: Black, Oak Green, White/Sage, Dove Grey/Maroon
• Price: $300 USD
• Certifications: ASTM F1952-15 DH certified
•
specialized.com Playing off of the looks of the newly released
Tactic 4, the Gambit features similar styling with large intake vents, more volume out back, and a fixed visor carrying a horizontal line into the top of the shell. At the rear of the helmet, you'll notice a built-in dial dubbed the Integrated Fit System (IFS) to keep things snug and a mount for Specialized's angular G-force indicator (ANGi) sensor.
Overall, the shape and volume of the Gambit is well balanced, with a visor nearly the same length as the chin bar, making for a proportioned outline from all angles. Breaking down the construction, the shell is made up of carbon fiber and polycarbonate guarding five unique pieces of patented EPS foam technology to optimally absorb energy. Although it saves on weight and cost, the helmet foregoes any soft trim around the face opening or along the bottom edge of the helmet. Adding a touch of rubber at the front and rear on the underside of the shell would increase the paint's lifespan. There is also the absence of any mesh or foam around the mouth vent, the largest in comparison to other helmets in the category.
Compared to a full-on downhill race helmet, it doesn't provide that locked in or sometimes claustrophobic feeling - think of the Gambit as taking away the false sense of security when you install goggles on a skid lid, but closer to a half-shell helmet that has a fixed chin-bar. For many riders, including myself, there is more justification to wear the Gambit for just about any ride.
PERFORMANCEFITOn my size medium test helmet I found the cheek pads fit best in the rearward setting and started with the IFS in the "2" position. Although I mentioned the volume of the shell was well balance in terms of looks, I did find that the helmet preferred to sit slightly rotated downward on my head. Altering the IFS to the "1" setting helped to rotate the chin bar and brow a bit higher. The helmet never moved around unnecessarily, though. A worthwhile tradeoff against breathability for me would be to add some padding around the crown and bring the fit up a notch in terms of comfort and assurance.
It's also worth noting that large framed goggles may not fit in the opening, depending on their foam thickness and your head shape. I had to downsize from the Smith Squad XL to the standard version because the goggle frame was too wide, shedding light on how the Gambit provides full-face protection in a minimalist package.
ADJUSTMENTSThe IFS cradled the back of my head and pulls it away from the shell in a secure manner to promote airflow, hence the lack of padding in the crown area. The dial is easy to reach and adjustable on the fly, locking the helmet in place to prepare for descents. As described earlier, this security device can also be adjusted vertically on the occipital area of the skull.
Two-position cheek pads come in dual thickness levels to tune the fit and keep the helmet comfortably in place. The chin strap is connected with a traditional quick release buckle and splits in two around the cheek pads. Just as you'd find on an open-face helmet, the mounting points are molded into the EPS foam.
VENTILATIONIn a head-to-head test, my non-scientific sweat analysis rates the Gambit very close to that of any other hard-hitting enduro open-face helmet. Breathing in fresh air isn't hindered through the large port in the chin bar - there was barely any build up of moisture on the inside. Although there is reasoning to skip the mesh in the mouth vent, it could be knocked down a touch in terms of height as it can sit just in your lower peripheral vision.
What those small cheek and crown pads lack in extra cushioning they certainly make up for with increased air flow all the way around the helmet, from under the neck area, across the top of the head, exhausting heat out the back.
The inability to hear in a full-fledged DH helmet can sometimes toy with my low speed balance, but the Gambit allowed me to stay alert through some precise and precarious moves.
PRICE A few of the reasons the Gambit looks so sculpted is the lack of bolts. The fixed visor clips on and the chin strap doesn't require any rivets, which makes for a smooth finish on the outside of the shell. You'll also notice that there aren't any camera mounts amongst the eighteen vents.
As much as I advocate MIPS for its added safety, it can cause some creaking noises as the shell rotates on the plastic liner during regular use, but that wasn't the case with the Gambit.
For this price, I do worry about the longevity of the cheek pad attachment method - the plastic pins held the pads tight during the entirety of the test, but didn't take much to pull them out of their perch. The durability of the paint has been excellent, despite a matte black finish seeing some encounters with branches, but I would like to see some protection along the rim of the helmet to make sure it doesn't collect chips over time.
WEIGHTTo add to talk of what you're getting for $300, the svelte weight of 640 grams fora medium might feel on the dainty side, but you have to keep in mind the target market for this style of helmet. The Gambit meets the critical DH safety rating, the whole reason why you'd be choosing full-face coverage.
Pros
+ Low weight and exceptional air flow for a DH certified helmet promotes more frequent use
+ On-the-fly eyewear storage and IFS dial allows for quick transitions
Cons
- Minimal padding makes it feel more like a traditional open-face helmet
- No rubber trim on lower edges of helmet, and no option for mesh in mouth vent
Pinkbike's Take | The Gambit establishes a happy medium for riders that want full-face coverage, but the convenience of a lightweight and well ventilated helmet. For those that might be charging on eMTBs at consistently higher speeds or on a winch and plummet style lap, there is no doubt Specialized's newest lid will boost your courage. You won't be left behind on transitions either, because the space below the visor makes it easy to move goggles in and out of place with one hand.
Compared to other helmets in the same category, such as the Smith Mainline, the Gambit does feel a little less substantial, but makes more sense than a 3/4 coverage enduro helmet. Since starting this test, I often see an imaginary question mark floating in front of the Gambit when choosing a helmet for my flavour of North Shore steeps, and haven't found a reason to regret choosing it.
— Matt Beer |
The price surprises you why?
At this point I ride with a Speedframe and Proframe. I definitely reach for the full face if I'm willing to deal with the heat which means it gets quite a bit of use in the fall and winter when it's cooler.
buuuut. i wouldnt shame people for doing so. in fact, im thinking about this kind of full face myself sometimes. might never need it to save me but ive seen enough crashes, including on blue trails (which are very fast when youre a seasoned mtber!) that id feel like its warranted. as long as its peoples choice, this seems great to me
@Jgallegos335 's stupid comment about full faces on blue flow trails is part of what's wrong with the bro culture in mountain biking. More people should be made to feel good about their decision to protect themselves more. It's esspecially harmful to the young kids who feel like they need to be as cool as possible.
But I'm seeing more and more enduro / lightweight full faces being worn all the time and it's great. So many of the new young rippers are also wearing them. Probably a generational change coming. Similar to skiing and snowboarding where almost no one used a helmet 20 years ago to now where it's very rare to see someone without one now.
Won't protect your jaw if you really bin it, but may safe you from unnecessary trips to the dentist.
Discrediting people for wearing safety gear- thats just low :-(
100%, my biggest spill was on a blue, and i was wearing my FF at the time, i don't think it bene fitted me in that crash, but it put a big enough dent in the helmet i opted to crash replace. The more trickier trails i ride tend to be more technical and slower, and probably don't even benefit from a FF, apart from perhaps riding into a tree...
Personally I think the proframe is better looking.
All personal choice isn’t it
As Fernando Lamas said, "It is better to look good then to feel good!"
These types of helmets are a welcome addition to folks like me that want to push the limits, and stay as safe as possible. I used to track cars and the culture around safety is much more mature in that sport. No one feels “self conscious” for having a proper helmet, neck brace, fire suppression or cage.
Thankfully I haven’t had to test it to the limits.
Back then they called it DH worthy, wish they would stop doing that...
So what actual safety foam is used? And in 5 pieces, Instead of a single piece??? That seems like a big talking point to discuss. What is MIPS SL, that sounds new? Does this carbon fiber actually contribute to less punctures like it does in lots of mainstream helmets, or is it for show/weight savings?
Here are the paragraph headers, for review:
FIT
ADJUSTMENTS
VENTILATION
PRICE
WEIGHT
Chuck, I also broke my chin bar on a rock, my wife bought me a new one with the thought that the $300 was way less than the dental bills. I still have it, I guess I should contact Troy Lee.
just saying.....cheaper and lighter.
but then again, Specialized just doing Specialized things....sure it's heavier, but at least it's more expensive!!!
I mean, these are one time use pieces of safety equipment. It's hard to say when something is a design flaw or just bad luck in hitting it just wrong...
www.instagram.com/p/CT2pI9usq1L
www.instagram.com/p/CUR2A1OMLyv
Also… no helmet safes you from a concussion…
We don´t know in which category this Speci helmet falls. The test results are almost never getting published.
Typically lighter helmets (500-750g) are worse then heavier ones (~1000g).
Even heavier ones at around 1300-1500g are bad for the neck.
Some testresults:
www.bike-magazin.de/bekleidung/helme/tuev-test-integralhelme-mit-abnehmbarem-kinnbuegel
www.mountainbike-magazin.de/zubehoer/test-27-fahrrad-helme-im-labor-und-praxistest
- Xenomorphs rejoice, this one fits a treat if you have a longer thinner head!
- Thanks to the Y straps it's also the first full-face I've owned where it doesn't rotate and expose my forehead if I grab the chin-bar and lift it.
- I've only ridden it on cooler days so far, but I rode up some steepish firetrails and it seemed to breathe fine.
- I always thought the idea of chin-bars not allowing you to breathe properly was pish until I tried climbing in my Endura full face and felt really short of breath. I didn't give it airflow a second thought in the gambit, for all intents and purposes it feels like riding in an open-face.
- I did a biblically wet day at BPW in it, with POC Ora goggles that don't have foam over the vents and no water flowed onto the back of the lenses.
- It comes up really large; I'm a large (58cm) in every helmet I've owned (due to xenomorphory), but I'm comfortably a medium in this. I tried the large first - it's huge.
- It feels bombproof.
- There's enough air-gaps to allow noise in and not get that cocooned feeling you get with a full on downhill lid.
- It's much better looking in the flesh, with our without goggles. (Obviously I only wear it with clear safety goggles and white full leg pads)
All told I'm really impressed with it and plan to wear it all the time now.
Better looking, less expensive, same safety rating, Fidlock, MIPS, only 50g heavier. Just get this one.
MTB News actually weighed the helmet and they found it to be heavier than Specialized claims.
Another "on point" weight measurement: bikerumor.com/2021/10/26/review-602g-specialized-gambit-dh-certified-full-face-helmet
Not sure how MTB News got a 50g discrepancy. Maybe they sweated into all the pads and measured it wet.
Anyway, I presented a legitimate use case for a minivan that is actually outside the normal parameters of the design. I’ve successfully executed over two decades and close to 3/4 of a million miles. So, if you think I’m choosing mediocrity, what platform would you say rises to your high standards? I’ll rule out pickup right away. Nowhere near the flexibility that I require, poor fuel mileage, substandard safety, and poor road comfort in comparison.
I’m honestly interested in what you’d choose, so let me know.
This PB comments section is certainly.... a comments section.