Helmets occupy unique space in the world of mountain bike culture. On the one hand they’re a necessary safety item, and on the other—let’s face it—they’re a bit of a fashion statement, mainly because with global distribution, helmets have to meet a variety of different international standards of consumer safety. In essence, a company like Giro, Lazer, or Smith, to name a few, is making their helmets to meet not just the CPSC standard, or just the CE-EN 1078 standard, or just the AS/NZL 2063:2008 standard, but to meet all of these standards.
So a high-end helmet sold in New Zealand, for example, legally will have to meet the same level of protection as a low-end helmet sold in New Zealand. And from a manufacturing perspective, given the cost of tooling, molds, etc. these same helmets in New Zealand are identical to their European or North American counterparts, regardless of the different standards found in Europe, etc.
But from a safety perspective, how do helmets actually protect your one and only precious brain? Gone are the days of the glorified hair nets of 70’s and 80’s. A bike helmet is now typically composed of a vented, polycarbonate shell mated to Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) foam or a material with similar performance characteristics (like the Koroyd material in Smith’s helmets and the WaveCel technology in Bontrager’s helmets). This protective material is designed to crush in a controlled manner, thereby reducing the forces impacting your skull in the event of a crash.
Many helmets also now use a rotational energy management system—MIPS is the most well known of these—to further protect riders in the event of a crash. These systems are essentially a slip plane between the head and the outer shell of the helmet designed to deflect forces from an impact to one side or the other in order to reduce head trauma in a crash—think of it like a ball and socket joint embedded within the helmet. Currently, while rotational management systems are known to add significant protection for our delicate gray matter, there is no standard of certification for this newer technology.
All this boils down to the fact that the safety of your head is in good hands. Below are 21 helmets that represent some of the latest of what’s available to protect your head when you ride. Please note that helmet makers all use different head forms for molding their helmets, so some helmets won’t necessarily fit your head as well as they fit someone else’s. So try before you buy.
Table of Contents•
Bontrager Blaze WaveCel Mountain Bike Helmet•
Leatt Helmet MTB 4.0 AllMtn V21•
Bluegrass Rogue Core MIPS•
Smith Forefront 2•
Giro Manifest•
POC Kortal Race MIPS•
Fox Speedframe Pro•
Sweet Protection Trailblazer MIPS•
Troy Lee Designs A3•
Bell Super Air Spherical•
Lazer Jackal MIPS•
Scott Stego Plus•
Oakley DRT5•
Uvex quatro integrale tocsen•
MET Roam MIPS•
Specialized Ambush w/ANGi•
Kali Protectives Maya 3.0•
Rudy Project Crossway•
Giant Rail SX MIPS•
100% Altec•
iXS Trigger AM MIPS•
7iDP M2
- Actual testing by a reviewer
- Any independent test scores (e.g. Virginia Tech)
- Details of what head shape the helmet works best for
- Relative sizing (does it come up big/small)
- Adjustable peak?
- Breakaway peak?
- Works with goggles?
- etc.
And also some indication of by what criteria these have been picked as 21 of the best?
Yes, we could have checked Virginia Tech, etc for independent test scores, etc; but that wasn't the point of this round up, rather it's to show what's available. And if a helmet in this batch catches someone's eye, if they want to dive deep, answers to your other questions (and VT's ratings) are all just a click away.
Looking forward to the removable chin bar lid review. Hopefully you'll have an opportunity to pick up on some of the points raised. I've always wondered if those removable chinbar helmets are more dangerous if the worst happens and the impact exceed their safety margins and the chinbar breaks away? Personally I've always avoided them just in case. It would be great if you could do some digging into that and help us make a comparative choice between those and the lightweight 'enduro' fixed chinbar full face lids.
Pink Bike... Please create content, don't repost it.
It’s disgusting. 0/10 would not recommend.
Instead of the stock front inserts. It works way better and I can have a spare in my bag if need be mid summer ride. Just a thought. Works with existing Velcro too.
Agreed I’m super happy with mine sweat drips out but away from eyes and glasses…have a smith forefront 2 that doesn’t work as well
store.haloheadband.com/Default.asp
There's always the folks that like to wear the bare minimum, but they usually change their tune if they get real hurt. I like to think I'm at least smart enough to learn from their broken ass bodies and skip that learning process.
The Leatt has a removable chin bar helmet that’s very similar, I think they call it the Dbx enduro vs all mtn.
Great helmet, I have it, has great ventilation and their own crash protection system which rivals mips in testing.
Look at it a different way, in your car which goes way faster than older cars, has better brakes, etc, do you wear a 3 point belt? Or did you install a race harness, wear a helmet and install an extinguisher system? Thought not.
Trail riding is still trail riding. Just on better bikes! - and that comes from a guy on the sofa with a set of crutches
I know a few people who said screw fashion and started to wear ff helmets on the regular, they all stopped pretty quickly as they're not just not as comfortable. It might be a tradeoff you're willing to make, if so, good for you, but it's still not for everyone.
Even then, you never know when you might take a spill!
We met this kid while out riding in Wales. His group seemed to be following the same trail ours and would often overtake us when we took a break or fixed a flat. We must have ridden 99% of the loop (which consisted of some really nasty techy sections filled with wet roots and rocks) when we finally hit the last bit of easy flat singletrack that linked us back to the trail centre. That's when we spotted the kid in front of us. He'd taken a spill and split his top lip on a rock... My god the image still haunts me to this day! His lip was open all the way up to his nostril and the blood was pouring out like a fountain! AND THIS WAS ON THE FLAT PATH TO THE TRAIL CENTRE!
Staying vigilant and knowing when to hold back is probably the best line of defence... otherwise, I can see myself having to wear a full face absolutely everywhere!
On my third one right now, that thing saved my life once.
only thing is Angi. It would be great to get it without at a lower price point. This feature is just useless for many customers and paying for it is a pain.
It's a sample size of one so other options could be ace, but I've done a few thousand kms with it and will buy another if it ends up getting wrecked
According to the official Giro website the Manifest does NOT use a BOA fit system, unfortunately.
www.giro.com/p/manifest-mips-mountain-bike-helmet/100000000500000097.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw4v2EBhCtARIsACan3nxGQWUyi6Q9uwzxabtm7bGjLGc9nX0SAqJz6U3ceBBNTBvsCJq3L4EaAi-yEALw_wcB
Wearing helmet this way is useless. No matter how much it cost or what kind of Rotational Impact Protection System it have.
www.traxfactory.com/sweat-buster
I also use it for gravel/road rides and it was super comfy on a century ride this weekend. 10/10 don’t mess with your brain, get a helmet that fits and is safe.
For example lower weight doesn’t seem to track well with higher price. With full face helmets I always thought I knew what I was getting for my dollar. I don’t understand these
Also, something worth checking out on the Hydraulic Press Channel on YouTube, they compare a bunch of different kinds of helmets to see how much force they can take. The results were pretty surprising.
I’m certainly open to being proven wrong. But I think the correlation of lab testing to real life at this point is very weak. And it’s not too likely that we’ll ever be able to ever devise a test with real life variability. MIPS has done some great marketing, and I can certainly understand the idea that if there’s a chance it might give you extra protection why wouldn’t you pay extra for it. But I don’t buy the marketing, and MIPS isn’t a consideration for me when I’m looking at helmets.
You see, im an internet commenter skeptic, I dont trust medial advice from people that don't have medical experience.
I’m not saying standardized tests are worthless, you have to be able to test all helmets with a consistent method. And the results are certainly comparable between models, so there’s value in that. I’m saying that until someone in the free world finds a way to ethically test helmets on real humans in real crashes, I’m going to remain skeptical that these standardized tests give us any more than a hint of whether MIPS or any other rotational energy compensating technology actually work in the real world. Nevertheless, kudos to all the companies who are working to make helmets better and safer.
What's genuine research? Good question, but generally it's something we already agree with.
helmets.org/mips.htm
images.app.goo.gl/MWj9XSz6B6mEx2uJ8
The rest are #nerdy
Oh look, my stalker is back. Following me everywhere still. Get a life.