Staff Ride: Dario's Dumb Little Hardtail

Jan 15, 2024
by Dario DiGiulio  
photo

STAFF RIDES

Dario DiGiulio's Stanton Switch9er Ti



This Stanton Switch9er Ti came into my life and begged for a strange build kit, and I had just the right collection of parts to make good on that task. At this point, I'm almost reluctant to refer to it by its model name, because I've taken the frame so far outside of its intended purview and build style - so I'll just be referring to it as the Stanton Steamer from here out. Thanks to the excellent frame quality and solid initial design, things were off to a good start, but I'm not one to leave well enough alone.

Right off the bat, the numbers are a little fuzzy on this rig. In its stock form, it's a pretty aggressive little hardtail, with a rather short rear end, a low bottom bracket, and slack head angle. Though there are only two sizes, the longer of the two fits me fairly well, though I'd probably add a bit of reach if I could. I took this neutral template and I freaked it. The primary change came from a 2° Wolf Tooth headset, bringing the head angle down and lowering the already deep BB to subterranean levels. Add to that a beefy 120mm fork, some serious brakes, and a smattering of other burly components, and you've got a very ignorant take on the simple side of mountain biking.
Stanton Steamer Details

• Intended use: stupid hardtail stuff, steep loamers, ankle breaking
• Travel: 0mm rear / 120mm fork
• Wheel size: 29"
• Frame construction: titanium
• ~63.5° head angle, ~76° seat angle
• 483mm reach, 428 chainstays, 70mm BB drop
• Weight: 29.1 lb / 13.1 kg
stantonbikes.com


photo

I'm currently running the Goodyear Newtons, as I really liked their performance in soft terrain while testing them this past spring and summer. I'm finding that the compound stiffens up in the cold a bit more than Maxxis' MaxxGrip or Specialized's T9 compounds, but the mechanical grip is still quite good in turns and steeps. As an added bonus, I think they look great.

I've typically run hardtails like this with an insert in the rear or both wheels, but am currently trying this with nothing but air in the tires. A Rimpact Pro or Cushcore in the rear makes a big difference, but the Goodyear's casing is stiff enough to give some damping at the right pressure without adding a ton of weight. I'll probably go back to the insert life soon enough, but for steep loamy trails (my desired terrain for this build) I haven't noticed too much of a difference.

photo
Goodyear Newton MTR out back.
photo
And a Newton MTF up front.

photo

Those Newtons are mounted up to a set of Evil Loopholes wheels, which I chose for a few reasons: 1. They're the wheels I had; 2. Their feel is somewhere between carbon and alloy in terms of compliance, which is a nice middle ground for this bike; 3. I prefer not to run the Hydra hubs on full-suspension bikes, but on the hardtail there's no suspension action to worry about with the very high engagement, making the cost-benefit an easier decision.

photo
Definitely didn't race an EWS on this bike, but the wheels have been through that gauntlet.

Extremely powerful brakes are a solid starting point for making any bike feel more confident, so I put some of the strongest brakes I've used on the littlest bike in my garage. I know this is dumb, but boy did my theory hold true. The Hope Tech E4s are excellent brakes, with easy to meter power and plenty of it. They're fussy to work on, and a bit noisy, but once set up they really do perform well. It's all too easy to lock up the wheels on this thing, but I'm trying to convince myself that's making me a better rider.

photo
Big fat stoppers on a funky little bike.
photo
None more silver.

To make the climbs easy, but not too easy, I'm running my ol' reliable GX/XO 11-speed setup. If memory serves, this is the sixth bike this drivetrain has been on, with only chain replacements to keep things humming along. The secret formula is a GX derailleur mated to an XO shifter for crispier clicks, XG-1195 cassette for low weight and max durability, and XO 12-speed chain for strength and a tiny bit more clearance when things are packed with mud.

I'm currently riding the bike with some Hope 155mm cranks, which take some time to get used to, but offer some unique benefits once you have. I like their feel in steep corners, where you want to steer with your feet and hips to pitch the bike in the right direction - especially on longer bikes with low bottom brackets. On the hardtail, I've found that effect less pronounced, plus the lack of leverage feels a little more frustrating on what should be a pretty zippy little bike. Odds are high that the shorties go back on a longer-travel gravity bike, and something more in the 165-170mm range end up on the Stanton.

photo
Good ol' GX 11-speed.
photo
Well loved.
photo
Hope 155mm cranks feel pretty goofy at first, but have some unforeseen upsides.

I had this specific fork setup in mind when building up the bike, namely something fairly stout, soft off the top, and with 120mm of travel. The latter variable was key to testing out my belief that 120-130mm is the most you need on an all-mountain hardtail. I'm definitely not the first to espouse this, but at this point I'm a firm believer. My main reasoning behind the shorty is to limit the geometry changes that happen as you compress the fork on a hardtail - otherwise known as the Stapler Effect. The longer your fork, the steeper your effective head angle is as things get packed in. With only 120mm, things are slightly less terrifying at bottom-out, and there's still enough travel to absorb most bumps.

I went with the older model Pike because I far prefer the way it feels to the current generation, specifically in terms of suppleness and traction. The new Charger 3 Pikes do an excellent job of keeping you high in the travel and muting larger hits, but they've lost a lot of the fluttery feeling I liked about the prior 2.1 forks. Sure, I use a lot of the travel a lot of the time, but that's what it's there for. My little Pike is bone stock, save for some Push wiper seals that I installed last time I did a full service and rebuild. I'm curious to try the large-stanchioned Ohlins forks for the same application, but that's an experiment for a later date.

photo
If silver forks are wrong I don't want to be right.
photo
LSC is a few clicks from open, HSC is open wide.
photo
100psi in there.

Those massive bars aren't just for the big-wheeled dirt jumper sex appeal, they're mostly just solving a problem I created for myself. The aforementioned Pike that was key to the build happens to have a very short steer tube, as I'd chopped it to fit a stubby headtube'd bike long ago. I've since learned my lesson, but in this case had to get creative to get the stack height back to a useable range.

This also helps compensate for the lower stack of the 120mm fork, and the slightly lower front end geo due to the -2° headset. The bend isn't my all-time favorite, but I've found a roll that feels good, and the long skinny extrusions feel quite comfortable on this stiff rig.

photo
Stack compensation.
photo
Serious alteration has occurred.
photo
Cables are quiet and only a little ugly.
f
photo
Protaper's handy setup ticks.
photo
Wouldn't be my bike if there weren't some unnecessary polished bits.

The Stanton Switch9er Ti is a satisfyingly simple frame, with beautiful welds, tasteful finishing touches, and nice details all around. The internal routing is definitely not something I would choose for myself, but it does at least keep the cables quiet as they punch through the frame, unlike other in-frame options I've encountered.

The stock geometry is probably a better fit for most people's uses, but I prefer my head angle modifications for my purposes. I'd probably opt for about 10-15mm more reach and chainstay length, though the existing geometry does keep things tight and playful, with easy handling in slow-speed jank. I've definitely ridden more stable hardtails in high speed terrain, but the Stanton feels like its best self in tight turns and awkward technical sections.

photo
More stickers.
photo
Handsome yoke and smooth cable routing.

photo
Stanced.

That's all for now - no Hardtail Week quite yet - but stay tuned for some more relevant content in the coming days.


More high-res photos here.



Author Info:
dariodigiulio avatar

Member since Dec 25, 2016
167 articles

139 Comments
  • 102 2
 This is the right amount of stupid. Nice work Dario.
  • 11 0
 Fantastic build..120/130 aggressive hardtail are fantastic
  • 2 1
 single speeds are more stupider
  • 1 0
 ...Yeah...but those Stankshions are Tooo Big!
  • 86 1
 Can you hear that? That's the sound of UK riders gently nodding in approval of this build.
  • 2 0
 Well said!
  • 2 0
 My Kingdom Ti hardtail I've had for years is much like this but with a 140 fork. It's the one I ride most out of my 4 mtb's. Thanks UK!
  • 65 1
 This is cool. I miss these kinds of write ups/articles. Not only because I only ride a hardtail, but it’s refreshing to see a unique one of a kind rig with some proper wear and tear. I guess I’m getting tired of seeing generic Transitions around town Wink
  • 40 0
 The world needs more funky bikes!
  • 3 0
 @dariodigiulio: cento per cento
  • 1 0
 @dariodigiulio: Love the funk.
  • 36 1
 Impressive. Very nice.
  • 39 2
 Let's see Quinney's dumb little hardtail.
  • 56 2
 @Ironchefjon: Look at the subtle off-white hot patches. The tasteful thickness of the downtube. Oh my God, it even has an etched wordmark...
  • 11 0
 @Ironchefjon: Spire with the lockout on?
  • 3 0
 @brianpark: With the Switch9er, Stanton really came into their own, commercially and artistically
  • 22 1
 Sick. Silver is the way. As a chronic tweaker, I need to know, are those marking on the bars to keep track of where your controls are? They seem way too far up to be for cutting the bars down.
  • 37 1
 There's programs to help lead you out of being a chronic tweaker. I hope you get the help you need one day.
  • 6 0
 Looks that way.

"Protaper's handy setup ticks"
  • 12 0
 @noodlewitnosteeze: Thanks. It's a tough world out there. One day your satiated and the next you're looking at some tasty looking bars that come with at least 20 lines.
  • 10 1
 I thought I’d introduce Dario to his Tweaker Brother From Another Mother — Adam of The Downhill Zone in Issaquah, Washington, and his silver + British Racing Green rig with Hope & UK parts, from 2021:
www.pinkbike.com/photo/26109264/?s5
www.pinkbike.com/photo/26109265/?s5
www.pinkbike.com/photo/26109293/?s5
www.pinkbike.com/photo/26109294/?s5
  • 4 0
 @WRCDH: Geez man, easy with the NFSW photos - I’m at work! Drool
  • 1 0
 @blissindex: Yeah, sorry, I should have included a NSFW + MIIGoV (May Induce Involuntary Grunts or Vocalizations) warning =P
  • 18 0
 If that bike is dumb, most bikes are real stupid asses
  • 3 0
 Absolutely. Every single component seems carefully thought out. If it is build to suit the rider, it is as clever as it can get.
  • 17 2
 This bike def fux. Silver forks is not wrong.
Orange forks isn’t either.
But silver is betterer
  • 13 0
 A beautiful homage to the great British janky footslapper. Just need 2 or 3 inches of mud welded to it and you’re done. Tea and biscuits all round lad
  • 10 0
 Nice bike. And it's good to see a Pike again on a trail bike and 11 Speed too.
  • 7 0
 Curious what's your favorite trail to ride this odd little bike on? Thinking it might be Hush Hush on Chuckanut. Needs to be awkward and tight.
  • 11 0
 wouldn't you like to know
  • 15 0
 but having ridden Hush Hush on it this week, I can confirm it's quite fun there
  • 4 0
 Great looking bike @dariodigiulio and pretty close to how I've set up my Banshee Paradox. 155 cranks FTW! I've Canfields on mine. Also I can't tell what the sticker on the side of the top tube says, but I like the Clay Smith Cams knock off up top.
  • 6 1
 Thanks Dario! HxC hardtails are dope and this Stanton is the perfect example. Sorry for the ones who still ignore how fun, capable and... dumb these bikes are.
  • 3 0
 Yay for stupid hardtails! I did a similar thing with my previous hardtail: 20mm shorter fork plus a -2 deg headset, giving a 64 deg HA and 130mm travel. Kept experimenting with that bike over a 6 year period, 140 and 150mm travel as well as different anglesets. It seems that for how I ride, more travel and more slackness is better (plus I like a low BB but not quite “that” low!)

I’m now on a Pipedream Moxie which I’ve had for almost 2 years. 160mm Lyrik up front and singlespeed out back. Its logical wrongness in almost all situations is making it the funnest bike I’ve ever had, from pretty gnarly descents to long XC pedals.
  • 6 0
 I dream that my HT is under 30 lbs. But then I wake up on my on my 4600' acsent ride, and the nightmare continues.
  • 3 0
 Are the updated geo number measured? It seems like Stanton report their geometry with a sagged 140mm fork, so with 20mm less travel you're roughly 1° steeper, so ~50% of the slackening from the angleset is offset by the shorter fork. In theory your sagged geo should be closer to 64.5°? Unsagged maybe something more like 63°?
  • 2 0
 Geo is measured
  • 1 0
 Pretty straightforward, if seat tube angle goes from 74.5° to 76° then head tube angle w/-2° headset must go from 65.5° to 65°
  • 5 2
 What FUN!! My hardtail has been an exercise in creativity, as well. Just about everything has been swapped out once or twice. Brakes, bars, drivetrain (except...), tires, yada. Head angle has been tweaked back & forth, with both an angleset & forks with different crown to axle lengths. It all works.

Some stuff I just can't make up my mind. Two forks for this bike. And they get swapped back & forth at least annually. Even some of the drivetrain has been swapped. But NOT THE GX SHIFTER GROUP!!

I did go to a Sunrace cassette. Steps are more even, and I wanted a larger pie-plate. And the chain has been upgraded to XO (longer life of ring & cogs).

But that dang first-gen GX11 derailleur & shifter are just plan BULLET PROOF!! I have NOT babied this stuff. And it's got the rock dings to prove it. The bike has THOUSANDS of miles on it. Most being over-ridden on trails it has no right being on. And the shifting is clickety click. The only thing I've ridden that even comes close was 780 series Shimano stuff I used on my dear departed 5.Spot. But I didn't ride that stuff for the 8 years I've ridden the GX11 (so far!).

Personally..., I can't understand why 12 speeds is all the rage. I went from 11 to 12 on one of my sus bikes. Good quality GX/XT grade stuff. I enjoy the 50t cog. But beginning to wonder whether I can find an 11spd cassette with a 50t cog & whether my ratty old first gen GX11 will work with the range. If so..., g'bye Mr. 12!!
  • 2 0
 Gabaruk has you covered. I'm running a 10-48 11spd from them and it's been flawless.
  • 1 0
 I have deore 11 speed with 50t on one of my bikes, cheap and dependable.
  • 1 0
 @NuMexJoeinLA: I ran this with XT and it doesn’t work like Gararuk says, user error on my part, shifter cables can’t handle the articulation and start breaking. I tried all different types of cables so trust what Garbaruk says and run the 11t with shimano.
  • 1 0
 @mrgonzo: My (now 12spd sus bike) came stock with an SLX 11spd setup. POS compared to GX. It's largely why I swapped it out. With only a few months of fighting it - I gave the whole drivetrain to our local community bike barn. To bad. What's up with Shimo, anyway?! My bride's late-model Burner came stock with 680 series (SLX) components, which have been unbelievably rock solid. Even after almost NINE YEARS(!!) of hard use - that stuff works like new. You'd think that between then and now, Shimo'd have actually taken a step forward. I just don't get it. Walking uphill on the downwind side of a sand dune, maybe?
  • 5 0
 NSMB “hardtails leaning on things” forum is leaking its “interesting” builds into PB. Need massive fenders and a single-speed option though.
  • 6 0
 Chefs kiss. We love us some hardtail content.
  • 5 0
 Everything about this component spec is spot on, starting with the longnecks and those bars, nice build dude.
  • 3 0
 Cool bike. I love my Banshee Paradox set up in a similar style. Nothing like a hardtail on easier trails, but they are also fun on more technical stuff as long as it's not an unrelentingly rocky taint pounder.
  • 4 2
 Dario, would you mind shedding some light on your geo numbers? Stanton's geo chart is based on a 516 axle to crown (140mm at a generous 25% sag / stanchions compressed to 105mm), and I'm confused why my 18" w/ 140mm fork is measuring 1210mm at the wheelbase with the fork unsagged vs their measured 1236mm at essentially 105mm fork. My top tube actual is almost 20mm short of the chart at around 600mm. I'm a taller rider at 187cm and was a little disappointed that the frame arrived sizing smaller than I'd anticipated. If you wouldn't mind measuring your TT actual it would help me confirm a suspicion that I received a frame with custom reach and head angle figures. Stanton hasn't responded to my emails.
  • 13 2
 Ride your bike man.
  • 4 1
 Hey @dariodigiulio can you explain more what you meant here: I prefer not to run the Hydra hubs on full-suspension bikes, but on the hardtail there's no suspension action to worry about with the very high engagement,
  • 13 0
 High-engagement hubs (like Hydras) are worse for pedal kickback on full-suspension bikes. There is no kickback on hardtails.
  • 1 2
 @FensterM: and... higher engagement = worse pedal kickback... because???
  • 8 0
 @taurausmountain: because these high engagement hubs engage more frequently when pedal kickback occurs in comparison to a hub with less engagement.
  • 13 2
 @taurausmountain: the way I look at is, an instant engaging hub will give you all of the available kickback that's designed into the suspension platform. Yet it will be consistent every time.

A low engagement hub with 10 or more degrees of slack may give you minimal kickback some of the time or an equal amount to the instant engaging hub, if the hub is in a part of its rotation where the park grabs immediately.

So an instant engaging hub won't give you more kickback then what's already designed into the bike. But it will give you all of it all of the time. Where a weaker engaging hub is a bit more of a random selection of how much kickback you'll get each time.

I could be wrong but that's how it works out in my brain.
I still rock hydras on my fs cuz they're cool
  • 3 0
 @DCF: Pedal kickback is not a big deal. it's just a noteworthy phenomenon that exists and most people don't really realize what it feels like while they're shredding a descent.
  • 1 0
 @devinkalt: I agree. I don't mind it. It's interesting to ride chainless and feel what it feels like when the suspension is totally free though
  • 2 0
 @devinkalt: partially because it almost never occurs while shredding down a hill. It is mostly notable on rooty flat sections or technical climbs, especially if you ride flat pedals.
If you feel it while shredding, it is likely the inertia of the chain flapping around, which is not pedal kickback, but can be tamed with an O-Chain or STFU type product.
  • 2 0
 To offset the rocking horse phenomenom stanton measure their geometry at sag, meaning the head angle runs slacker than spec.. running a 120mm fork and an angle set is certainly a questionable, interesting way to compliment that design.
  • 4 0
 Only on PinkBike do you find a cheeky bike check using secondhand parts ... and a $3k titanium frame.

Wow, what a fun little weird cute stupid bike you have there.
  • 2 0
 Nothing dumb about that! The new wave of aggressive HT's don't get enough coverage on PB. Great spec choice(esp the Pike!). Besides weight, have you found the Ti frame has provided any other positives to the ride characteristics?
  • 3 1
 1. Nice looking hardtail, there is something nice about riding a capable hardtail.

2. Fort William on a 120mm hardtail - www.pinkbike.com/news/video-a-rowdy-run-down-the-fort-william-world-cup-course-on-a-120mm-hardtail.html

3. So sick..
  • 2 0
 Would love to hear opinions on the geo, since it's opposite to most of what's being sold today. Also seems to contrary to Henry's thoughts that a low stack balances a short CS bike
  • 5 0
 I made mention of it in there, but I'd definitely add some length to the chainstays if I could, as well as raise the stack. It's fun as is, but feels a little squirrelly sometimes.
  • 1 0
 @dariodigiulio: sounds like my Solaris Max with 120, 63, 444. A mate has the S9er and the S Max climbs better. I'm currently on a 50mm rise bar with 25mm spacers but also have a 70mm rise bar.
  • 1 0
 Veeeery nice. Looking for a Pike Ultimate for my BC Podsol for a long time,also in 120mm. The HA that slack isn't for me or my trails,the steering would only come alive on super steep or super fast stuff,and be super dead on the flat stuff or tech climbing. More of this please!
  • 1 0
 Sweet steed, I love looking at and reading about hardtails, I've also owned some beauties over the years but I think my days of riding them every second ride is over. My modern ones are gone but My old ROS 9 is rolling again , with a -2 degree Angleset and an XO 11 sp, still fun like it was in 2015.
  • 2 0
 Sorry Dario, but my steel hardtail with a 120 Pike has 11speed xt on it and I’m willing to die on this hill (I’ve never had a single SRAM drivetrain so I’m definitely qualified to argue about this)
  • 1 0
 10Zee is the hill I die on.
  • 1 0
 I’ve been HT curious for a year or so now and really getting the itch for a steel/Ti bike. This isn’t the exact type of build I’d go for but I love to see the uniqueness as I’ll be going outside the norm as well. I have a build that will be replaced and think of it as the man-bear-pig of a bike; 50% road, 50% gravel and 50% singletrack build. The new Pace RC429 is at the top of the list right now with the Turner Nitrous 2nd.
  • 1 0
 I’ve had this frame steel (UK Reynolds 631 of that’s important ) for a couple years, have tried a 120, 140 and 160 Fox fork, the last two being grip 2 dampers. The 160 doesn’t feel quite right but I gave the 140 to my son and the 120 with a FIT damper was good for xc type riding and was as quick as my Pivot Les for those trails. I’ll probably reduce my fork to 150 because that’s the lowest it goes, but 140 probably is the sweet spot for this frame and their recommended geo. I run 11 speed XT/XTR shifter and it’s a super durable and low maintenance rig and can handle just about anything I ride. I’m no hero but have been riding for 30+ years and do alright for my age.
  • 1 0
 This bike reminds me a lot of my semi-custom Kruch Gnartail, which has become my favourite bike I've ever owned. We even went with pretty similar spec choices in some areas.
I'm rocking the same ~63.5° and ~75° angles, with a 480mm reach and 432mm chainstays, and a BB height that I specifically requested as "stupidly low". I don't know off the top of my head what it weighs, but with a steel frame as opposed to ti, mostly alloy parts, and DH tires with inserts, I'm guessing somewhere around 33-34lbs.
  • 1 0
 Looks like an absolute blast... short travel forks on hardtails with angry geo are a great pairing for fun. Frame looks good, but oh my god do I hate that cable routing. The cost and service time that adds for absolutely nothing is mind boggling.
  • 1 0
 When I owned a full susser and a hardtail, the full suspension just sat and collected dust. The hardtail had all old parts, and if something needed replacing, it got the absolute cheapest option. I rode it until it cracked. Still miss that old chit-box. There's something to be said for a hodge-podge build.
  • 1 0
 Love to see a good hardtail, especially one that looks well used.
I just built a Chromag Wideangle (27.5) with a 150 pike, and I'm also running a Sram 11 speed setup almost identical to yours with a million miles on it too haha. I kinda hate it on sustained steep fire road climbs but otherwise it gets the job done and stays quiet!

I gotta ask though, with that BB drop are manuals even an option? I bet it absolutely rails turns but probably also feels glued to the ground at times.
Cheers, great job on this write up!
  • 1 0
 Tight and ready to fight! Rowdy little rig. Curious what your take is on these handlebars, because in my opinion they look tits but wow are they flexy, er über compliant or whatever.
  • 4 0
 I love Stanton, so glad to see you do as well!
  • 3 1
 When the moment arrives that you just know what bike you need to ride - Do you say aloud - "Hi Ho Silver! Come on, Silver! let's go big fellow! "
  • 2 0
 Nice Lone ranger reference. I'm old...
  • 3 0
 Nice build! But I still think the 140mm on my hardtail are better for drops and stuff. Soloair Charger 1.
  • 3 0
 Dario! We want the stories of the stickers!
Henry? Your hardtail better have a sticker story too.
  • 1 0
 Clean looking bike! Surprised to not see a Mudhugger on it. These photos must have been taken in the PNW, or (North?) Vancouver; you can't replicate that temperature silver hued light.
  • 3 0
 Frown Now I will only think of her and will no longer have relations with my wife
  • 3 0
 MT7 with 200’s front and rear in my hardtail. It makes up for a lot of interesting riding decisions.
  • 2 0
 Sick bike. Little, zippy hardtails are the best.. particularly for mud rides where mechanical sympathy can be thrown out the window. More PB bike checks!
  • 2 0
 Like this a lot - a riders bike. Lots of thought and experience has gone into making something that suits the owner to a T. I bet it absolutely rips!
  • 4 1
 Nice looking bike! Looks like it would be great fun to ride!
  • 1 0
 I lost my beloved Hardtail last year in a stupid car crash, longing for a new one ever since and this just lifted the desire to a new level.
  • 2 0
 This thing is rad.

Dario, did you notice any drop in front braking traction/power from the reduced BB height?
  • 3 0
 Would be the perfect stupid bike if it was single speed
  • 3 0
 Hardtails are the future! Sick ride Smile
  • 3 0
 155mm, nice!
  • 3 1
 Hm, figured he'd be on a LaMarche
  • 2 0
 I could be so lucky
  • 2 0
 What's the story on the cigar cat sticker? That ain't Fritz the Cat.
  • 2 0
 I think I got it at the Cub House in LA, but it's been in my sticker bag for so long I'm not sure.
  • 2 0
 @thomasjkenney1024: looks like the Thrush muffler bird, too!
  • 1 1
 Or a confirmation that the geo chart is bogus, albeit unlikely because wheelbase and tt actual aren't subject to that much measurement human error.
  • 3 0
 More of this please.
  • 2 0
 Such a beautiful bike. Have you seen the NSBillet pewter brake adapters?
  • 2 0
 Boy have I. They're nice, though I'll probably just sand these down.
  • 3 0
 Keep hardtails weird.
  • 2 0
 I love my steel switch9er. I have mine set up with a 140mm pike.
  • 2 0
 Keep bicycling weird, love it Dario!
  • 1 0
 Awesome. A bit like my cheapo 26er with 160 Pike and On One Dee Dar frame. I'd love a slacker longer frame like this one.
  • 1 0
 Other than the handlebar and grips, this is excactly how I would build a HT.
  • 3 0
 Moist
  • 1 0
 Dario does it fit a 2.6? Looks tight with the 2.4. I to like my XO1 shifter, derailleur, and cassette. XX1 chain.
  • 1 0
 Looks like a bikelife bike
  • 2 0
 Hi Dave
  • 2 0
 Don't you mean Hello?
  • 1 0
 Would be interesting what @StantonBikesUK thinks about the build....
  • 1 0
 Definitely needs one of those saddle angle adjuster gadgets.
  • 1 0
 Two-out-of-three ain't bad.
  • 1 0
 Rad bike!
  • 1 0
 That looks fun.
  • 1 0
 i like
  • 1 0
 Nice drivetrain.
  • 2 3
 Those BMX (background) handlebars! haha
  • 2 3
 too slack, must be a disaster in the corners
Below threshold threads are hidden







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.054863
Mobile Version of Website