Starling Cycles Adds UDH & Shows Off a Downcountry Build of the Murmur

Dec 11, 2023
by Starling Cycles  
photo

Press Release: Starling Cycles


At Starling Cycles we make beautifully simple, single pivot steel mountain bikes in the UK. We have updated our frame design to include SRAM’s Universal Derailleur Hanger (UDH). The update to Starling’s Murmur, Twist and Swoop frames sees a redesigned swingarm that is now being supplied as standard with all orders.

The new design means more affordable, easier to source, and available worldwide hangers with UDH now being the most easily available hanger ever made. It also means better performance with UDH being designed to rotate under impacts and ‘re-rail’ chains when they de-rail. Need a hanger last-minute before your holiday? They’re easily ordered and sourced online, worldwide and generally less than a round of resort-price beers.

Existing V2 and V3 customers can also purchase a new UDH swing arm to replace their existing version.

photo

UDH is an updated hanger standard for Starling, but isn’t our first replaceable mech hanger. We began with a repairable, tough and bend backable ‘fixed’ design which saw almost zero failures. We then moved on to a proprietary, replaceable hanger, which owner Joe was hesitant to change until he saw UDH really take off. Because the bike industry has enough standards already, right?

However, the combined benefits of UDH and the low cost and ease of sourcing replacements finally offered enough benefits to justify the redesign.

photo

The update also sees a switch from IS standard to post-mount brake mounts, another upgrade for Starling customers. This change makes for a much cleaner, slicker-looking swingarm and that means owners can now fit a 180mm brake rotor without the need for adapters. And also that those 200mm mounts are much more neatly and cleanly integrated.

photo

But, that’s not all that’s new. The updated UDH swingarm is shown here on a Starling Murmur ‘DownCountry’ Edition, in prototype raw ‘IPA’ finish.

photo

The Starling Murmur is a versatile, handbuilt, steel full suspension frame. The adjustable shock mount allows different length and stroke shocks to be run, meaning owners can adjust travel and completely change the personality of their bike to suit their style. It’s offered as standard in ‘Trail’ or ‘Enduro’ modes - but the Downcountry setup shows another option. The Downcountry build pairs up the Murmur frame and a 210x50mm rear shock to create a hard-charging, big-pedaling, fast and super exciting short-travel 29er.

Rear travel is reduced to 120mm with no impact on geometry and then a 120mm fork steepens the head and seat angles by 1.2° to 66.2° and 79° respectively. The build as shown here weighs in at just 12.7kg - although as we all know, bike weight doesn’t matter right? And with fast-rolling Michelin Force tyres and lightweight DT Swiss wheels, it flies.

photo

The superbike spec shown here was built especially for the recent DT Swiss Craft Bike Days show, pieced together with a super high-end components list including:

- DT Swiss F232 ONE 120mm fork
- DT Swiss R232 ONE 210x55 shock
- DT Swiss XRC1501 wheelset
- SRAM XO T-Type drivetrain
- Michelin Force XC2 tyres
- BikeYoke Revive
- Trickstuff Piccola 180mm brakes
- Bjorn Probka cork-covered saddle
- Bjorn Palka carbon bar
- Intend Grace stem


This particular one-off MegaMurmur DownCountry is currently for sale, strictly as a one-off. Price on enquiry. And that IPA finish? That’s something special - more on that coming soon.

You can find out more about Starling Cycles at StarlingCycles.com. Existing V2 and V3 customers can order UDH-equipped rear triangles by contacting Starling.

photo


Author Info:
Starlingcycles avatar

Member since Mar 6, 2018
11 articles

97 Comments
  • 53 3
 Levy leaves and then Starling shows up with a downcountry steel bike? Interesting...
  • 18 1
 It still has an adjustable lower shock mount so you can turn it in to crossduro in an iffy.
  • 4 2
 Until this model was released it was a ufo....totally Levy's style. Levy has left his mark on cycling forever: downcountry AND the f*cking grim donut...which I guess is dead now. I dunno who's got the mojo to keep going with it.
  • 2 0
 @Mtn-Goat-13: What's Yoann Barrelli up to these days?!
  • 1 0
 @iwhizz: You'll have to ask him
  • 24 7
 Just to get in there first and save all you clever commentors some typing:

www.starlingcycles.com/why-our-steel-seat-stays-are-strong
  • 12 3
 Looks like it's not your first time in the PB comments section.
  • 6 4
 Mmm... Nahhh looks too flexy
  • 11 8
 Why would anyone care about flexy chainstays in a bike with tons of kickback and linear leverage rate
  • 2 1
 Wink

(love editing options on mobile)
  • 5 7
 @lkubica: Maybe you’re just trolling. But read any review of a Starling bike and you’ll see all your preconceptions are totally wrong. They ride great. A good bike isn't designed by numbers, and bullshit marketing terms, but in the real world!

I feel sorry for you that you are so weak to resist the marketing you are subjected to…
  • 8 3
 @phutphutend: This supposed to be sarcastic in a bit clearer way, but PB ate my emoji. Honestly, I would expect a better sense of sarcasm from a Brit.
  • 4 2
 @lkubica: Ha, sarcasm is tricky in PB!

Sounds like you too have the force flowing strongly in you...
  • 2 3
 @phutphutend: We did our best to make it ass clear as possible with @lkubica butt not clear for everyone.
  • 2 0
 @lkubica: It's got a rising leverage rate actually. The mechanical advantage rises by 33% from zero to full compression. This is absolutely relevant. Luckily they specced a small air shock this time. Should provide a fair amount of progression in itself.
  • 1 0
 @mtb-daniel - honest question, because I keep getting myself turned around when talking progressivity and suspension curves: If the mechanical advantage increases towards the end of the stroke, doesn't that mean (irrespective of the air spring itself ramping up) that the kinematics are REgressive? I think of progressive = harder to bottom out, but wouldn't increasing the mechanical advantage through the stroke make it easier to bottom? Or am I just not using/understanding these terms correctly?
  • 2 0
 @gtill9000: yes it does, this one is regressive. Which you can sometimes find on XC bikes. It's hard to tell what will be the curve with a progressive shock, but more or less constant (not to say linear, cause it's PB and someone will say that linear means every curve such that Ax +By +C=0).
Anyway, what Starling does with most of their bikes (constant leverage + coil) has merit. Those are not bikes for everyone or for every trail, but in certain situations they will work exceptionally well, since unlike progressive bikes, they have lot's of midstroke and will ride high in the travel. Progressive bikes on the other hand need lot's of sag and thus have less midstroke, especally with dual chamber air shocks ... Personally after riding progressive bike and more "linear" bike with coil, I prefer progressive with air for trails I ride, but can imagine people being very happy with more "linear" bikes, they are just different.
  • 4 1
 @gtill9000: People tend to think they want a progressive leverage ratio so that it gets firmer at end of stroke to stop harsh bottom outs. The Starlings are constant and linear through full stroke, so they don't stiffen up. But if you use a coil shock with a big rubber bumper (or hydraulic bottom out) then this combined with some flexibility in seat stays means there's no harsh bottom out.

So different solutions to achieve the same thing?

The benefit of linear suspension curve are much better mid stroke support, and a much easier job for suspension tuners to get the best performance.
  • 1 0
 @gtill9000: The mechanical advantage of the "rear wheel driving the shock" increases.
  • 9 4
 Bike is a BEUT!! I am currently riding a custom Swoop, I’m a 27.5 holdout…they are the BEST IMHO. But I could really enjoy a bike like this for longer days in the saddle! I bet the ride is all time. Also the guys are Starling are awesome! Fun to work with and make a great bike.
  • 1 0
 No doubt deathrut is optimized for 27.5
  • 2 0
 @dwbaillar: Yes! It’s BRUTAL.
  • 8 4
 The owners are a happy go lucky bunch and seem to be very beholden to this company. With all the great steel offerings out right now they were high on my list. If the newer Cane Creek coil has come out when I was looking I would have snagged a Murmur. I like their bikes and look forward to seeing more from them. I did end up picking up a Reeb SST with another contender being The Chromemag Darco. Nice bike Starling!!!
  • 8 1
 Yes please
  • 3 0
 Pink Panther 2...
  • 3 1
 I’d hardly noticed there were components attached to that frame; stunning finish in particular.

There’s something really aesthetically pleasing about Starling frames. The fact the functionality doesn’t lag behind makes it all the sweeter. One day…..
  • 8 3
 In what way is changing to post mount an ‘upgrade’?
  • 5 1
 you can now run the newest and shiniest stuff on it... duh. But I mean bro... it's obvious, bike geo peacked in 2021, 2022 saw an "adjustability" trend with headset cups and MX flip chips, 2024 is gonna be all about extra gimmicks cuz there is nothing left for geo to improve.
  • 1 1
 Galfer doesn't recommend running 223mm rotors with IS mount. I like big brakes and I cannot lie.
  • 6 1
 is that a cork saddle? it looks lovely
  • 4 1
 You're corking right it is!
  • 3 1
 @AndrewFleming: He wood know!
  • 4 2
 My understanding is that everyone is into steel for the flex, which seems to make the ride more forgiving. Then they put a carbon bar and wheels on it. I get that there is a weight issue, but am I missing something?
  • 3 0
 Carbon can be engineered to be flexy in the right spots so it's not necessarily stiffer....at least for bars your options are alum and carbon and carbon is generally considered the more flexible option. I'm not personally a huge fan of carbon wheels, I like the little bit of flex alum ones offer.
  • 5 0
 When I first got some carbon wheels I thought they were all about the weight. Turns out they are all about the durability!
  • 4 3
 > but am I missing something?

You are missing literally everything by assuming carbon parts are necessarily stiffer.
  • 2 3
 No Starling owners I know use carbon wheels. This is specifically a "downcountry" build (though that doesn't make it a DC bike IMO).
I just have carbon bars on my Murmur. Why wouldn't I?
  • 2 0
 I see your point, I do not have steel bike and love carbon, but the main benefit of carbon wheels for me not even the weight - it's the fact I do not need true them every month Big Grin
  • 9 6
 Sweet bike, I still mad at SRAM for introducing yet another standard and this one requires us all to update our frames again to support their patent business objectives.
  • 15 6
 You are mad at SRAM for creating a future where there is potentially only one derailleur hanger design?

They are literally attempting to remove the problem that’s making you mad.
  • 9 2
 Why are you required to update your frame? No one’s forcing you to do anything.
  • 9 1
 @sfarnum: he's also made that Fox improved the 38 for 2024 so he has to update his fork that worked just fine for 2023. And don't get him started on the 2024 Tacoma that makes his 2022 Tacoma absolutely undriveable.
  • 4 2
 Theres some guy who got rid of drailleurs all together not long ago it might be worth a punt if a hanger pains you so!
  • 2 1
 I never had a problem with the gear hanger. Cost $10 for a new one.
  • 3 1
 @deathbystereo: then enjoy your plentiful $10 hangers.

My current hanger cost $30 and takes 2 weeks to get to me from the only place I can find that sells them. I've never had access to a hanger within 48 hours for less than $25 on any bike I've owned. If all my bikes were UDH I could literally keep one spare hanger in my box instead of 6 different ones.
  • 2 3
 @RonSauce: you know you can purchase them in advance right
  • 2 2
 @browner: right, and if my bikes were all UDH I wouldn't have 6 different ones in my tool box, I would have one spare. I wouldn't have to find 3 different places to order then hangers from either. It would be cool to buy a bike and not order a spare hanger day zero.

With a UDH I could order one in advance OR be confident that any respectable shop will have one. It isnt that I "can" order a hanger in advance, its that I have no option but to order a hanger in advance.
  • 2 0
 @RonSauce: a standardized derailleur hanger is such a positive for consumers. I am yet to see a downside.
  • 2 2
 @RonSauce: lemme tell you about how a lot of nice bikes come with a spare hanger when you buy them.
  • 3 2
 @GTscoob: how many thousand more do I need to spend to avoid buying a spare hanger?
  • 3 0
 You don’t have to buy a new bike because UDH exists. (FYI)
  • 6 2
 Man, those Michelin tires are ugly, so much blue and yellow.
  • 1 0
 They're a big hit in Sweden
  • 18 19
 The effort in that build to showcase a FS steel frame building up to a 28lb final bike weight. Cork saddle! Pinner tires. Featherweight fork and shock. It's still a ~10lb frame, folks. Let's have a ton of spec compromise so the frame can be steel.
  • 14 3
 It's a 'downcountry' build. They weren't exactly going to spec a lyrik/36 and a coil shock , were they?
  • 9 15
flag phutphutend (Dec 11, 2023 at 10:30) (Below Threshold)
 It's not 10lb, a bit less than 8lb.

But anyway, you took the bait!

Read this, then come back with an informed response:

www.starlingcycles.com/does-bike-weight-matter
  • 9 3
 @thebabbizarm: "8lb frame' really means 8.4 lbs without shock. Add a shock and its 9.5lb, which is actually on par with a very burly aluminum frame with a big air shock.
  • 17 3
 @phutphutend: *Go read this unbiased article written by the guy trying to sell you said heavy bike
  • 10 3
 @phutphutend: ok that is actually bullshit. And why wouldn't be from a "heavy" bike frame manufacturer? I am talking here about only personal experience, but I switched from AL to a very similar C frame and saved 1.5 kg in a final bike build ( with mostly the same level of components) and I can feel that... it's a big and noticeable difference and not 1% as that writing claims.
  • 11 7
 @phutphutend: You bait potential customers? Dickhead
  • 2 7
flag browner (Dec 12, 2023 at 3:37) (Below Threshold)
 @thewanderingtramp: you baited and triggered bro?
  • 4 2
 Amazing bikes, always great to see them out in the wild on the trails shredding! Keep up the great work!
  • 3 1
 Weird flex but ok In all seriousness I ride a Cotic FlareMax and I worship the thing.
  • 3 1
 Starlings…https://youtube.com/shorts/nk_6NGUOgNM?si=XFea4lBXHs3QXlLc
  • 1 2
 Yes, please make bikes that 99.99% of bikers can use! Enough Enduro monsters with 180/180 travel and weighting as much as an electric bike

(well ... not sure about the weight ... this is steel ...)
  • 2 0
 Downcountry without bottle mount's?
  • 9 8
 color to the welds is a brilliant touch, love it!! cheers
  • 17 1
 It’s fillet brazed, so that’s the natural color.
  • 3 14
flag Bro-tato (Dec 11, 2023 at 10:30) (Below Threshold)
 @BikesBoatsNJeeps: Definitely fillet brazed. I doubt subsequent versions for sale will be, though - it's too labor intensive vs TIG for their cost structure.
  • 16 4
 @Bro-tato: Interesting conclusion. We've sold nearly 1000 fillet brazed bikes! Not that much slower once you know what you're doing. The brazing/welding is only a small proportion of the time of building a frame...
  • 3 2
 @phutphutend: especially considering you can TiG braze and save the effort of torch heating and flux application. I’ve had to braze a fair amount of cast iron and I find TiG brazing is as fast as TiG welding.
  • 1 6
flag thenotoriousmic (Dec 11, 2023 at 11:12) (Below Threshold)
 @phutphutend: what’s the benefits over welding?
  • 3 3
 @Bro-tato: How much welding school have you attended? Your comment suggests "0" days.
  • 4 3
 @thenotoriousmic: There's a blurb about it on Starling's website. Basically the larger area the braze consumes spreads out stressors and brass cracks/propagates slower.
  • 3 3
 @BikesBoatsNJeeps: so you’re just using lower heat and a different rod composition with Tig brazing?
  • 4 4
 @sanchofula: The rod is brass, not sure of the exact alloy. Yes, you do not melt the base metal and only use enough heat to get the rod to melt. Then it a little more like aluminum welding where you end up with a pretty large weld puddle, however you're still not trying to puddle the base material.
  • 3 2
 Will never trust brazing for any kind of rough ride with a heavy rider.
  • 5 5
 Brazing is much tougher in my opinion Traditionally it was used for items where damage tolerance is important, roll cages, speedway motorbikes. We have had no issues with any braze frames...

Maybe you just have experience of crap brazing, we certainly don't do that!

www.starlingcycles.com/whats-the-best-way-to-join-steel-tubes
  • 3 3
 @phutphutend: The Starlig Spur tested by Paul Aston broke immediately in the BB, and he is 73 kg. Starling was quick to repair it - with more brazing. It should probably have been welded in the first place.
  • 6 3
 @joni0001984: I don't think they ever conclusively showed the brazing had failed. Only the paint.

Welds break too.

It's about the deign not the process.
  • 5 4
 @joni0001984:
Paul breaks everything he rides!! And it was only a paint crack in this case.

Why do you think welding is stronger? I'm interested to here your thoughts on the reasons why, or is your evidence just circumstantial.
  • 2 1
 @phutphutend: Not the aluminium Nicolai G1 frame. 1000 frames and no warranty issues. In theory steel should be stronger/less "crackable" than aluminium.

If it was a paint crack on Paul Astons Starling Spur, then why was it reinforced? Paint cracks on the bottom bracket is enough to make me nervous. It indicates that something is bending, cracking or moving.

@The-Spirit-of-Jazz: Nothing conclusive in this case. That would have needed a more destructive investigation, and I doubt the Starling prize winner would agree. In theory, brazing is strong, but welds are stronger.
  • 2 2
 @joni0001984: I think this is more a case of a company that has built thousands and thousands of frames having more experience in framebuilding than the material or joining technique used. See Giant Bicycles for another great example, making a thousand frames a day with an industry-leading warranty rate.

When you make that many bikes, you know how to cut the tube ends for tight alignment which is the most important characteristic you want with a tight, strong weld.

Starling is still such a small, niche player. They may not have cutting jigs for repeatable tube fitments, or if they do, they might not replace them as rapidly as a larger manufacturer would to maintain alignment across production batches.
  • 2 1
 @GTscoob: We have great jigs & tools for cutting tubes. With V3 frames we have zero warranty rate.

Paul's Spur was one of the first of a batch of ten frames. We had built pre-production frames with no issues, but there was a slight change in brazing process to the production version that caused an issue. So, quality is not an issue, rather there are always teething issue with new designs going into production. It affects every company unless they are making tiny iterative changes.
  • 3 0
 @joni0001984: have a welded steel main frame cracked. Exchanged the main frame with a brazed one….lets see.

So many cracked carbon frames out there from big companys. They know there job for sure, but they do cut manufacturing costs for margin. simple as that for mainstream stuff.
  • 3 6
 Looks cool, don't think there is any strength issues but has anybody ridden one? It LOOKS flexy as all get it....which may not be a bad thing, could really help the suspension.
  • 10 7
 Hey @phutphutend look!! You caught a live one!

Joking aside, he discusses this here: www.starlingcycles.com/why-our-steel-seat-stays-are-strong
  • 3 3
 @shinook: LOL, did you read my comment?
  • 3 0
 @RadBartTaylor: pfft no, we don't read around here.

Joking aside, yes, I misread it. My bad.
  • 7 1
 Ridden a murmur for the last four years--yes it has some flex designed in, but it never feels flexy to me at 160 lbs unless maybe slapping bike park berms. I've seen plenty of truly flexy bikes that you can deflect the BB a bunch, this isn't it. It rides fairly normal, but also seems to have just a bit more to give on off-camber, wet, and weird sections. Works for me
  • 5 0
 @strangemeadowlark: Please put on 40 more pounds this holiday season and get back to us. Thanks and enjoy the desserts.
  • 4 1
 @strangemeadowlark: @AndrewFleming I've had my Murmur a bit over 4 years and are about 95-100kg kitted up. Yeah it's got some flex but in a good way especially on natural tech. I don't ride flow trails so couldn't comment on those.
  • 4 3
 @AndrewFleming: Hi! 200lb starling owner and rider here. My swoop rides a lot like every other full suspension bike I have owned. Works amazing for my local trails laps, bike park days, and bike trips. No complaints here!
  • 3 2
 @AndrewFleming: 220# 6'7" here on a 165/160 starling twist. not super flexy, rides awesome.
  • 3 3
 Liking that paint scheme
  • 3 5
 wow... this bike is ugly... I want one







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.045455
Mobile Version of Website