Unless this is your first time here and this podcast happens to be the very first thing you've clicked on, there's a pretty good chance you've seen something shot by either Max Barron or Tom Richards. Field Test videos and photos? Yup. First Look videos, Budget vs Baller, Daily Drivers, Explainers, reviews, and everything Tom and Christina? All of the above, as well as shooting Crankworx and mountain biking's own Big Wave Event, the Red Bull Rampage.
Max and Tom, new hire Stefan Licko, previous videographers like Jason Lucas (who we miss dearly) and Devin Francis, and a handful of hardworking hired hands, have delivered some incredible imagery over the years. Episode 121 sees Henry and I talk to them about what happens behind the scenes, their typical Field Test workdays, what they're looking for in a location, and the challenges of shooting Rampage... like the time Max camped out on a cliff all day but still missed the shot.
Got a question for the PB video and photo team? Put it in the comment section below.
THE PINKBIKE PODCAST // EPISODE 121 - HOW TO FILM THE RED BULL RAMPAGE AND FIELD TESTS WITH THE PB VIDEO AND PHOTO TEAM May 12th, 2022
For camera settings, should you choose the green box or the running man?
Max took this photo of me riding Spot's Ryve 115 29.
Tom's photo of Sarah Moore from last year's Value Bike Field Test on the Sunshine Coast.
Is Henry moving fast or is it all Tom's panning?
Black, white, and downhill bikes.
Tom's sunset shot of Ryan Palmer at the end of a very long day of shooting bikes in the desert.
It took roughly fourteen hours over two days at the Pemberton hang glider launch to get all the beauty and detail shots for our down-country and trail bike Field Test.
Oceans and sunsets from Sechelt and the Value Bike Field Test.
Featuring a rotating cast of the editorial team and other guests, the Pinkbike podcast is a weekly update on all the latest stories from around the world of mountain biking, as well as some frank discussion about tech, racing, and everything in between.
How to film Rampage.... 1) Get a go pro. 2) Start recording. 3) Call your missus by her sister's name during an intimate moment. 4) Runaway with the camera facing backwards.
All the editors at PB absolutely shred...I get why there are doubters, but damn, they ride a lot harder and faster than 95% of the bike community. It's kind of silly seeing all the 'can you weigh 215lbs and test this bike?' comments on bike reviews, only because of how hard I know that the editors ride the bikes.
I started seeing him pop up on more Mahalo My Dude videos and wondered if he made a switch... He'll be missed! And PB will need a new Academy host, unless Christina takes over full time.
Do you have any need for remote video editors? After 15 years in the industry I've never got to edit any bike-related content other than personal videos. Would be great to bring more flair and excitement to Pinkbike's content.
70-200mm is such a great lens, my Canon 70-200 F2.8 is the real workhorse out of all my gear. I probably shoot 70% of all my images on that lens and rarely feel the need to be able to go past 200mm. 400mm would definitely be a nice option to have to really punch in on some shoots but I'd say go for the 70-200 if you are just going to pick one!
Just note to the PB crew: I do truely love your work and appreciate that you are trying to broaden your audience. But the First look article for a commuter, Ebike hardtail got me wondering what you vision is for PB? You’ve added more XC and even some gravel and I’ve enjoyed most of that content. So I’m not judging, just asking. Is there pressure from upstairs? Or is it just driven by Mike’s Lycra fettish?
Zero pressures, we just post what we think is interesting or relevant Sometimes it might be a semi-related wonky commuter bike haha but hopefully not too often.
@mikelevy do you think you guys could do more impossible climb or efficiency test style videos on all of your reviews? I do appreciate how you guys have upped the game on your reviews over the last 8 years or so, but I also love the bro science stuff because it gives the site a top gear for bikes feel.
Nah, I think those will usually be reserved for Field Tests. They require two filmers, drone work, a bunch of editing, etc whereas we only need photography for a standard, weekly normal bike review that comes out on most Mondays - wouldn't be realistic to do that every week. But yeah, I really like the Top Gear-ish vibe and they can be entertaining.
We've discussed doing an efficiency test for every bike review, but not film it and only test that one bike and have those numbers in the review. The same goes for having one descent to film every bike on. But conditions vary so much and PB editors are spread out, so it wouldn't ever be consistent.
@mikelevy: that makes sense. Maybe if every bite comes through your main office, you could do a huck test. Almost like the stig, just have a full face helmet and some goggles... You can have Wade, vanderham, or some other OG Free riders cycle through to do it.
@mikelevy: I have a greater appreciation for the efficiency tests now that I know how much effort goes into them. The results are often expected, but it's interesting to see how big (or small) the differences are between bikes
Really enjoyed this. I've done a bunch of filming work in the past with some of the greats. When they mentioned having to ride down a section with full kit to get to the next section resonated heavily. Pro Australian DH Goat: "Yea man, you'll be sweet, it's just a creek at the bottom of this vert rock slab, and the size M e-bike i let you borrow even though your a 100kg Moose will take it." Me: Cool....splat.
Attempting to film myself and doing pretty okay at filming/photographing others riding has given me an immense respect to the teams that make content. IFHT comes to mind about being very open about packing in and riding with their gear, it would be neat to see glimpses of those behind the camera as B-roll or just a couple of stills.
Question for Max and Tom, how much time do you spend setting up your settings for a location and setting, and what do you suggest to a novice to start that journey beyond the default/automatic?
Setting up for riding footage is pretty quick, I think repetition is the trick there. If we are shooting something else, like a talking head section, we will take anywhere from 30 minutes - 2 hours for setup and we are focusing on lighting, backdrops, camera angles, etc.
I think having a good understanding of what lens compression does to a subject and how to properly light a scene are important steps in the learning process. Also, a lot of practice will take you a long way!
@vapidoscar: I was in Whistler and had forgotten my cold weather stuff so I was kind of scrounging. I went for b) iii) full face, visor, sunglasses, short sleeve jersey, arm warmers. I’m lucky they didn’t kick me out.
Am I the only one who would gladly swap Henry out for James and Brian back? He just comes off as whiney and way to specific on things. Palmer has been a great addition. Full disclosure I'm a few episodes behind but just curious what everyone take is.
Is it the accent? I'm British and find the complete opposite. I like Henry but find Palmer whiney? I like his written content but I cant gel with him on audio/video.
@AyJayDoubleyou: I didn't think so and definitely am not bothered by the accent. More of the specificity of things. He's comes off fairly dogmatic about how he goes about his riding. His stories and anecdotes are entertaining, but gives off a very "purist" vibe.
I have been loving this podcast over the last couple years though.
I like Henry's take on things. Whether he's talking about the role of social media, mental health, or trail music, he seems like an authentic character who doesn't mind opening up about things here and there. I like Palmer, too, though he gives me a slight Simpsons Comic Book Guy vibe (no offense, buddy). James never seemed to offer much beyond reading the news. I liked Brian's input as well.
1) Get a go pro.
2) Start recording.
3) Call your missus by her sister's name during an intimate moment.
4) Runaway with the camera facing backwards.
Question for max and tom regarding focal lengths.
Do you find 70-200 enough when out shooting still images? Or du you sometimes go longer?
Tryin to choose between 100-400 or 70-200.
Im thinking that in wide open areas a longer lens could really get some interesting stuff. All the best!
Me: Cool....splat.
Question for Max and Tom, how much time do you spend setting up your settings for a location and setting, and what do you suggest to a novice to start that journey beyond the default/automatic?
I've done a) and b)i) for different reasons. a) to keep my eyeballs from freezing and b)i) because goggles are too foggy on a humid day.
I have been loving this podcast over the last couple years though.