The internet told me that the earliest comment section opened way back in 1998, and I think that was followed by someone posting "First!" less than thirty seconds later. The general consensus seems to be that things haven't gotten much better since, with countless major websites closing down their comments while blaming trolls, doxxing, and a lack of resources to moderate and keep discussions pointing in the right direction. If you need more evidence, there have been all sorts of studies looking into people's online behavior, with some saying that up to 25-percent of forum users have posted at least one toxic comment. In other words, not exactly a friendly place to hang out.
So, why bother having a comment section? Today's podcast sees Henry Quinney and I chat about how Pinkbike is a community and the comment section is a visible, living extension of that community, article feedback and online interaction, moderating mistakes and banning users, and why we'll never close our comment section.
Have a comment about the comments? Post it below and we might read it in a future podcast.
THE PINKBIKE PODCAST // EPISODE 141 - WHY THE COMMENTS ARE IMPORTANT
September 1st, 2022
First!
Featuring a rotating cast of the editorial team and other guests, the Pinkbike podcast is a weekly update on all the latest stories from around the world of mountain biking, as well as some frank discussion about tech, racing, and everything in between.
Subscribe to the podcast via your preferred service (
Apple,
Spotify,
RSS,
LibSyn, etc.), or visit the
Pinkbike Podcast tag page for the complete list of episodes.
Love him though.
That’s definitely a cultural difference, every other word is f*ck over the pond
If Pinkbike was shut down, we would be asking Nicole Formosa what bar you have been drowning your sorrows in. It's only because we care. PS to @outside750: it appears that Kristin Butcher has landed well.
It's a terrible look for Outside to openly promote a magazine and then shut it down a few weeks later.
We don't have to over complicate it. Refund the subscription, and/or offer a free year of Trailforks (or credit for additional time if already a subscriber). There, I just solved it. I don't think any of us are too concerned about the money, it's the total lack of response for something we tried to support.
Is there a reason @brianpark refuses to speak on the matter?
I'm sure working under Outside is no picnic. All these industries following the consolidation/disruptor formula that is all the rage now seem to going in awful directions.
The biggest annoyance for me is the repetitive copy/paste negative comments week after week for series like PBA and budget/baller. And if that's my biggest annoyance I think life must be pretty good!
The way it is now, any slightly controversial opinion is hidden.
I don’t see the down vote as an attack on me. I can have an opinion and someone disagrees with it. That’s fine. If I say that drop handlebars are the best solution for the aerodynamic problem in DH racing, then a “disagree” is fine. I don’t see it at someone calling me the scum of the earth.
Then again, I haven’t finished the podcast yet (half way through) so I don’t know how much moderation you have to do.
I don't mind a bit of Harry's Garage though.
Or maybe a feature where when I’ve had enough and am no longer interested, I can push a button to check out of the conversation. Let those guys keep arguing about Trump’s wall. I’m out.
Excellent question for a future podcast.
Totally unrelated but how about an episode on the history of DH and enduro privateers, the wild stories, who railed it, how teams changed that, who's left and what the privateer forecast may be. No illusions here that teams suck: they're great, but lots of current team members were privateers very recently, there are still some serious shredders out there w/ zero team support - which in a way is more hardcore than getting all the massages - its a great thread in mtb life.
www.pinkbike.com/u/edspratt/blog/video-raw-chaos-and-carnage-from-megavalanche-2022.html
1. I worked behind the scenes in a fairly prominent sports organization. Reading the comments on our sport’s version of Pinkbike, you see just how clueless all the commenters are. So often, they just really have no idea what they’re talking about. I try to remember that when I comment. Do I really know all the facts and details, or do I truly know more than the president of the company, the the chief engineers or anyone else who really knows?
2. Levy was right about the dawn of message boards and comment sections, people were much more respectful of their community. You didn’t used to read trash. Discussions were much more civil than they are these days.
3. I notice these days, people are much more ready to downvote a comment they simply disagree with, rather than engage in a discussion. When I joined Pinkbike all those years ago, downvotes seemed a little rarer and reserved for the most extreme, idiotic or goofy posts. I always had a personal policy of never downvoting anyone simply because they made a statement I disagree with. If I want to engage, I’ll engage. If not, I’ll keep scrolling. I just think people are a lot more intolerant and touchy these days.
4. Posting something like, “Yeah bro, nice bike,” leaves no mark. If you want your comment to stand out, put yourself out there. Make a statement. Have a real opinion. Upvotes and downvotes be damned. High numbers in either direction means you said something. Otherwise it’s just boring. Take Waki, for example. Love him or hate him, you knew damn well who he was. Still a legend, and he deleted his account like three years ago.
I will also give Pinkbike credit… you guys censor or limit comments far less than the other sport site I was talking about above, and many others I have seen. It’s refreshing for a site to let the opinions flow. Kudos to you all.
You guys also mentioned how other news sites have turned off the comments altogether. I think that’s cowardly. They put out some news or an opinion, and they don’t want discussion? Opposition? Questioning their authority? Bad form. And they wonder why trust in them is at an all-time low.
Question for an episode as I think it would be hilarious to hear Quinney piss a lot of people off: In a similar area to most people being over-biked to you think most people are over-tire(d)? I rode with some friends of a friend recently and they talked about how "worthless" EXO casings are. They acted as if they just tear if you look at them wrong. They were all running DD casings on their mid travel trail bikes meanwhile I was sitting there with EXO+ on my big plow bike. Maybe it's because I grew up in Colorado and was forced to learn how to pick lines or pay the price but it's been years since I last had a tire failure that I couldn't immediately be like "yep that was my fault". Maybe I just don't get the appeal of running a DD at sub 15 psi because eventually you have to pedal that slow rolling heavy turd back to the top of the hill. Maybe the low PSIs are why they feel they NEED heavier casings or maybe they need to pick better lines.
To me there's a difference between people who try to discuss the facts of something (journalists, scientists) and those who are trying to give something a particular spin for some sort of gain (marketers, ad writers, influencers etc.).
Brian has talked in previous podcasts about brands paying to be on field tests and to win reviews etc. in some publications and that really opened my eyes. Someone particularly called out Dirt magazine for that I recall.
I've always thought/hoped PB tech editors are trying to expose the facts around what they are writing about - if a bike has a shitty spec, or rides bad I trust you all to tell us that, even if that brand has a massive sponsor deal with you and even if that means you take some heat. That makes you journalists to me.
I hope that's the way you all approach it too, but I think that's also what's important about the comments section - to a degree it provides an immediate bullshit detector because what ever is being written about, someone out there has knowledge and experience too.
One more point on the journalist thing - I take Henry's point about bikes just being toys, but so is a violin and we don't think of musicians as just playing - we see their music as art and the essence of being human. I think a lot of us get passionate about bikes because they scratch that same creativity itch for us and also calm our minds and souls. I'd be the first to say my riding is far from art, but the need to do it comes from some place inside!
I have a question for a future podcast: in the latest field test videos I heard the reviewers talk and compare a bike that had shorter reach/slacker head angle to a bike that had a longer reach/steeper head angle but similar wheelbase. Could you ask them to dive into that deeper? What makes each one different or similar?
Like those ZTTO 5EUR grips www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-t4Mx_H22g
What is your point, what are you asking here (serious question)?
Yes, I saw the interaction... However, from my point of view, it isn't a publication or moderators' job to inform a spokesperson how to behave in a public forum (or specifically a comments section). Ultimately karma will handle that because word will get around and either A) that person will be fired or reassigned and the situation will correct itself, or B) the brand will quickly lose its luster and its connection to the market and people will go elsewhere.
PS; love your handle as it relates to the TL helmet review
That way I could see the unpopular opinions but not see the garbage hate.
How I ended up here: searching youtube information about bits and bolts and screws I found a video from mister Henry Quinney to GMBN and youtube suggest me to watch Mike and Sarah in something called impossible trails.
You guys have a nice community. And as aways on the internet, your community is a reflection of your own work and you guys should be proud.
bring back RC content! Saw a bunch of his creations on display via a friend in a shop in Nebraska (I think) and I want more. Maybe on YouTube with explanations?
This pod was great. Much love for having actual opinions.
Because, let's not forget that there are motorcycles that cost as much as the Megatower. And those weigh hundreds of pounds, need to be shipped long distances, and also have distribution markups. So, this has nothing to do with where they "can" save money
These days(youtu.be days), state side: Hagerty for smart and comprehensive, saavsgegees for real no nonsense stuff and technical and throttle house for funny top gear reborn, on a budget; revzilla and big rock moto for.. well.. moto.
Across the Atlantic, Harry's garage, Carfection of course, JayEmm on Cars, Joe Achilles and supercar driver. +Tim Rodie rides motorbikes, everything from Chris Northover from Bike World, everything from Simon Hargreaves from Bennett BikeSocial... and..pretty much, that's it.
Rest of them are pure garbage bla-bla with no real value on their videos. (still being puzzled on how garbage content like doug demuro gets so many views)
aa.. one more to mention...for deep f1 analysis and inside discussions/info.. all from Peter Windsor.
cheers!
Proudest moment of my shitposting life.
@mikelevy
That 'look at the awesome planet killers" was exactly the tone of that Truckworx article - let's all celebrate this thing we all know is a negative thing future generations will look back on like we look back on lead paint, DDT and the slaughter of the bison.
Moderate and delete sexist and abusive commentary, but don't hide commenter's opinion because someone doesn't like it.
Keep in mind, editors, moderators, and government officials/spokespeople are all humans, and they are all susceptible to perverse incentives and capture at one level or another, which means that you really have no idea if what you are reading and hearing is legit, well thought through, or something else... When we lose the ability to think critically for ourselves, look and listen with a skeptical and questioning eye/ear we also give up some of our freedom and liberty (perceived and otherwise) and slip further into a "managed" existence. Personally, i want the ability to see it all and make my own choices - the results of which are on me.
Like last week, when an actual journalist (who I believe does articles here) told me/via comments section, about 2 motocross riders that have missed the 22' moto season due to concussion, and that is completely untrue, like no shred of truth to that (source? I know their team managers...and, one of them has been racing/finishing races). So I will agree with misinformation in the comments, not sure about 'dangerous' but, definitely misinformation.
Shit - haha - Apparently my sarcasm meter is down...
#me2
No worries, all good here!