Test editors get to ride some pretty nice stuff these days, with the majority of value-minded mountain bikes offering performance that would have been unheard of a decade (or less) ago. So wouldn't it be more interesting to go back to when things weren't so good and reliable? Today's episode is the second part of our bike ownership history chat, with the first covering Kazimer's Spooky Junebug hardtail, rattle-trap RM7, and his Iron Horse Sunday that was powered by Loctite. My old Giant ATX DH and heavily modified Prophet and Remedy made the list as well, but today's episode sees us get much more modern. But don't worry, there are still some sketchy hardtails, exotic downhill race bikes, and modern classics to cover in podcast 70.
What does your bike ownership history look like? Is there one that you're ashamed of? What about the one you wish you still had?
THE PINKBIKE PODCAST // EPISODE 70 - THE GOOD, BAD, AND STRANGE BIKES WE'VE OWNED - PART 2 July 2nd, 2021
120 minutes in and still no Slingshot...
Featuring a rotating cast of the editorial team and other guests, the Pinkbike podcast is a weekly update on all the latest stories from around the world of mountain biking, as well as some frank discussion about tech, racing, and everything in between.
@brianpark what about a post-race podcast? PB have one of the best world cup filmers/video makers/analysts in Cathro, Christina as a race expert, Henry an ex-world cup mechanic and self proclaimed race fan. It could be a separate affair to the usual PB pod but I think there's a market for it?!?
Yo! I got a question for the podcast. I'm looking for a new bike, an all-rounder full suspension that can handle the black level DH tracks where I live, but still ride more XC stuff efficiently. I'm on a high school race team in NorCAL that does NICA XC in the spring and California Enduro Series in the summer. I'm not a full xc racer but enjoy the races. I'm ISO a bike under 4k that could handle 3k+ vertical training days but still shred DH. Any suggestions? I've been on the entry-level Specialized Fuse hardtail for a while and it's just not enough bike anymore... Thank you, I appreciate your advice!
Just get an enduro bike and then swap over the tyres for XC racing. Enduro bikes now a days have really good pedalling efficiency even with a coil shock. I'd recommend getting a Norco Sight because they have good reliability for the price and offer a really good suspension set up guide, so It'll be dialled on the first ride.
As a note, the head angle of the ATX is 66deg. My favourite park bike is still the SC bullit 2 .... but that's an other story (you may test both in parallel )
Until August of 2019 I was still riding my 1996 Trek Y22 multiple times a week. I did not know what I was missing out on so I still loved riding it. At the time I had no issues except I kept having to JB Weld the rear shock mount to the carbon frame every 3 months or so. But as I started trying to catch more air and the trails got tougher I thought I should upgrade.
Now I have a Trail bike with modern spec. The Trek is now a museum piece.
A question for the Podcast. You guys talked about the Transition Spur and you own one and how good it is. I'm shopping for one but any comments/comparison with the YT Izzo? why would you choose one over the other? I live in flat Michigan.
@mikelevy & mikeKazimer: there’s always comments about bikes in tests where you feel it works great in your environment etc. I get that but, how about you conduct a bike test somewhere completely random, away from your home continent?
Also, gives you the chance to test out the “would a modern 2021/22 geo bike beat a classic DH racer down a track”. Get over to Europe and create an edit on your bike if choice down a euro track. Fort bill would work as there isn’t a drastic change in track Lay out.
We've definitely reviewed bikes in many other places, and we also have test editors in different locations in America and in Europe where the terrain is vastly different I think we emphasize how rough/steep/technical it is here a bit too much TBH, especially as there are plenty of flowy, smoother trails that we test the bikes on.
Driving down the road, going on a road trip with my 2002 specialized bighit(with monster t), 2003 block 8 journeyman(set up for jibbing) and a 2005 santa cruz nomad hanging over my tailgate feeling all alone in this world...I left my modern bike at home (2019) because it's a hardtail and I've listened to that podcast too...I guess I don't belong on pinkbike anymore.
I hope this gets seen and I'm not too late with my comment. I love downhill racing but with recent events on the world cup and the french nationals I am starting to wonder if all the injuries can be justified. I would love to see a podcast on the subject if downhill racing is getting too dangerous and what actions could be taken to reduce risk for the riders.
Healing vibes to Amaury Pierron, Thibaut Daprela, Nina Hofmann, Marine Cabirou, Tracey Hannah and everyone else nursing an injury...
K, bike park etiquette questions here and its a two parter
1) riding my local park in BC this weekend and kept coming up on slower traffic. I am faster than most, not all of course but I kept hitting slower traffic. Sometimes I hold up and let people go on their way while I wait. For example if there is a family with kids ahead. But then I kind of expect those people to let me pass when it's safe. No one was doing this. Just wondering what you think the ethic is here. 2) I hit a road gap with a blind landing on a flow trail and there were people stopped in the landing. Almost killed me and then. In skiing the uphill skier is responsible for not hitting the downhill skier but on a ton of park flow trails you are jumping into blind landings. Am I wrong for expecting no one to be in these blind landings? Or do we need to spot every landing on a flow trail now?
1) Bike parks are full of all sorts of riders these days - it's more accessible than ever - so I'd argue that the onus is on the faster, more experienced rider to be chill about things, regardless of if the other person is in the wrong. In a perfect world, slower riders would always move over and the flow would never end, but I don't think anyone should expect that when doing casual bike park laps. I'd say that the answer is to kill 'em with kindness and remember that it could be their first day in the park and maybe they're scared shitless
2) I've had exactly that happen to me a handful of times. It cost me a fork once. This is more difficult to forgive as everyone should have common sense, but that's not life. I think the other person is in the wrong, of course, but I've also been spooked enough that I'm pretty careful about blind landings. Some new riders might not even recognize that they're standing on a landing, which sounds crazy but their perspective is very different. Stay safe, look at the landings!
I see short travel trail bikes become more and more common, but where are the ones with external brake routing? As someone that changes the brakes the second I get a new bike it is quite frustrating to deal with internal routing and I would also like to avoid cable knocking, which all my previous bikes with internal routing have had.
I had been racking my brain trying to decide to buy either a V4 Ibis Ripley, or a Transition Spur. Levy and Cassimer never agree about anything, especially bikes. They both agree that the Transition Spur is an awesome bike. Ordered one that very day.
@brianpark I'd like to see @mikekazimer and @mikelevy swap their personal bikes and spec them as if it were their own then swap back for a ride. Could be great TV for the potential tears and tantrums.
@mikelevy: You're joking, but to a large degree that's actually how it is for most mountainbikers where I live. One of my favourtie trails is an ancient footpath down a hill from a monastery that was built 600 years ago. You can only imagine the views.
@BenTheSwabian: Only half joking! I've been lucky enough to do plenty of riding in Europe and appreciate that kinda stuff. I'm a bit of a history dork, so it just feels rad to be on old trails like that, coasting past old refugios and old huts. Amazing.
Great followup to ep. 69 - skip the effin' alien junk. Might as well have an episode about Teletubbies. It's BS along with bigfoot, the Bermuda Triangle, the Deep State, Vaccine Magnetism and all the other cartoons of the modern era.
I'm sure the final hunting gathering tribes of the planet looked up at blimps / balloons, the 1st simple aircraft then WWI & II planes & bombers, then spacecraft and now drones & said "Ahhhhh - that's just the Germans or the Americans (whoever)..." - or would have any way of differentiating us from any ''ufo's'' or "aliens" (our term) that might arrive. The similarity is us & "aliens" is just too close to distinguish.
Face it - humans are the aliens on our very planet. Who knows less, is dumber & less informed, has zero actual ability to clothe, feed, maintain ourselves independently and completely drunk with ourselves (self included) on this planet than us... non-earth aliens are laughable. You are them right here.
@mikelevy: Ironically 1) I'd still listen to the podcast as I'm addicted to PB podcast and listen to each of them 5-6 or more times to let it sink in and; 2) I am certain our solar system (and the universe) is teeming with life and that easily there could be others out there but that they have the technology to get here is kinda boring and beside the point compared with most life on earth and how little people know or give a shit about it on our very own planet. They'd also be likely (if not more interested) to study & care more about all the other forms of life than only humans because: drama. Besides - seriously if there were aliens w/ technology that could get them here, humans wouldn't be able to tell them apart from us anyway - they could blend right in. Its the rest of the earth that is so different and more interesting that yet more humanoids anyway - my opinion.
Good to hear the appreciation for the 111 and 153 in recent episodes. The 111 was such an eye-opener and I loved it so much I bought a 153 as well. They were both brilliant fun - sturdy, playful and predictable - but the downside was that they pedaled like a sack of spuds. Perhaps lacked anti-squat? That's why I moved on, anyway. Looking back, Kona and Transition deserve a lot of credit for sticking their necks out with longer reach numbers (and shorter seat tubes) quite early on.
Ugh, I know. I left it too late and wanted a bunch of interviews with some people that I'm trying to get in touch with... but maybe it should just be me yelling at @mikekazimer about aliens for an hour lol
I'm also waiting for that one. Might I suggest a book in the mean time? Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock. Hancock is, shall we say, a topic of contriversial debate among scholars, but mainly because he questions the standard model of anthropology. The guy definitley knows how to do his research and I think most of his arguments are made in good faith. What I like most about him is that he isn't one of those crazy conspiracy nuts, but just a skeptic, in the philosophical sense of that word.
@BenTheSwabian: That's a great book. I wish people had more open minds; much of the history crap we learned in school was wrong at the time and is either wrong or in question now. It's fair that things change slow (especially school curriculums lol) but it seems like the old, classically trained scientists just refuse to even be challenged that there COULD be a very different story to our past. I believe there's a high chance that our history is drastically different from what we think happened.
@BenTheSwabian: Thanks for the recommendation, I just placed the order, let's see how it goes.
I was actually looking for a recommendation like this, my dad owns a first copy of chariots of the gods, we loved reading that book back in in the mid 90s, then internet came, ancient aliens got popular on History Channel and the spark was kind of lost for us.
The whistles are course marshals letting course-side fans know that a racer is going to come flying through in a few seconds. The whistle really means, "GET OFF THE COURSE!"
feel free to come by and test the ATX DH (again), ready to ramble:
www.pinkbike.com/photo/10187714
As a note, the head angle of the ATX is 66deg.
My favourite park bike is still the SC bullit 2 .... but that's an other story (you may test both in parallel )
Cheers
The further you go down the hill, the further the bite point moves outwards ( that is, if fading does not compensate for it )
I live in flat Michigan.
I get that but, how about you conduct a bike test somewhere completely random, away from your home continent?
Also, gives you the chance to test out the “would a modern 2021/22 geo bike beat a classic DH racer down a track”. Get over to Europe and create an edit on your bike if choice down a euro track. Fort bill would work as there isn’t a drastic change in track Lay out.
Kaz had a norco optic a little while ago (pre-commercial meta) that he mentioned he liked a while ago. How does that compare with the spur?
Spur vs optic?
K, bike park etiquette questions here and its a two parter
1) riding my local park in BC this weekend and kept coming up on slower traffic. I am faster than most, not all of course but I kept hitting slower traffic. Sometimes I hold up and let people go on their way while I wait. For example if there is a family with kids ahead. But then I kind of expect those people to let me pass when it's safe. No one was doing this. Just wondering what you think the ethic is here.
2) I hit a road gap with a blind landing on a flow trail and there were people stopped in the landing. Almost killed me and then. In skiing the uphill skier is responsible for not hitting the downhill skier but on a ton of park flow trails you are jumping into blind landings. Am I wrong for expecting no one to be in these blind landings? Or do we need to spot every landing on a flow trail now?
Tough questions, just looking for opinions.
2) I've had exactly that happen to me a handful of times. It cost me a fork once. This is more difficult to forgive as everyone should have common sense, but that's not life. I think the other person is in the wrong, of course, but I've also been spooked enough that I'm pretty careful about blind landings. Some new riders might not even recognize that they're standing on a landing, which sounds crazy but their perspective is very different. Stay safe, look at the landings!
I'm sure the final hunting gathering tribes of the planet looked up at blimps / balloons, the 1st simple aircraft then WWI & II planes & bombers, then spacecraft and now drones & said "Ahhhhh - that's just the Germans or the Americans (whoever)..." - or would have any way of differentiating us from any ''ufo's'' or "aliens" (our term) that might arrive. The similarity is us & "aliens" is just too close to distinguish.
Face it - humans are the aliens on our very planet. Who knows less, is dumber & less informed, has zero actual ability to clothe, feed, maintain ourselves independently and completely drunk with ourselves (self included) on this planet than us... non-earth aliens are laughable. You are them right here.
They were both brilliant fun - sturdy, playful and predictable - but the downside was that they pedaled like a sack of spuds. Perhaps lacked anti-squat? That's why I moved on, anyway.
Looking back, Kona and Transition deserve a lot of credit for sticking their necks out with longer reach numbers (and shorter seat tubes) quite early on.
I was actually looking for a recommendation like this, my dad owns a first copy of chariots of the gods, we loved reading that book back in in the mid 90s, then internet came, ancient aliens got popular on History Channel and the spark was kind of lost for us.