PINKBIKE FIELD TEST
Transition Patrol Carbon
Words by Matt Beer; photography by Dave TrumporeWhen Transition dropped their 2021 Patrol, it only appeared in aluminum and sat in between two other carbon models - the boundary-pushing 170mm Spire and 150mm Sentinel. The alloy Patrol targeted riders who wanted a faster handling bike than the Spire, but more muscle than the Sentinel, however the frame weighed a beastly 4.63 kg (with a shock). That made me think there must be a carbon version on the way to trim some fat, at an added expense of course.
Retaining all of the same geometry and travel as the alloy Patrol, the carbon version drops 1.3 kg off of the frame weight and arrives in two new frame colors: a monochromatic “Moon Shadow” matte grey or red hot finish.
Patrol Carbon Details• Travel: 160mm rear / 160mm fork
• Carbon frame
• Wheel size: Mixed
• 63.0º - 63.5º head angle
• 77.6º - 78.1º seat tube angle
• 442 / 440mm chainstays
• Sizes: S, M, L (tested), XL
• Weight: 15.2 kg / 33.6 lb
• Price: $6,699 USD as tested
•
transitionbikes.com Like two other bikes in this Field Test, the Patrol is also dedicated to a 27.5” rear wheel, although the chainstays come in two lengths, depending on what half of the sizing chart you stand on. That slots the mid-travel enduro-ish model between two other popular bikes in Transition's line up; the 170mm Spire, which pushes the boundaries in terms of long and low, pedal-worthy geometry, and the more contemporary 140mm travel Sentinel.
Transition distinguishes their frame angles and lengths as Speed Balanced Geometry - they were one of the first to figure out that short offset forks work best with 29" wheels and slack head angles. The Patrol comes set up with 160mm of travel front and rear, but can be bumped up 10mm at either end by swapping suspension stroke lengths. Sliding a 170mm fork on there will rake out the already slack 63/63.5º head angle even further.
When scoping out the sizing, you'll notice that the Patrol isn't available in the gargantuan XXL serving, like the other two previously mentioned bikes. That's because most riders above the 195cm range most likely want the extra stability that a 29" rear wheel offers and that's not something that the Patrol can accommodate anyways. Following a common and sensible trend, the chainstays do vary depending on the frame size; 434 for the small and medium, 440mm on the large and extra large.
External brake routing fans will be enthused to see that this line runs outside of the downtube while the rest of the lines are fully guided through the frame tubes. Other frame features include a Universal Derailleur Hanger and a top tube accessory mount, plus a straight 56mm head tube allows for all the geometry adjustments with reach adjusting headsets. I also appreciated that Transition spec'd a chainguide with a skid plate right from the get-go.
At the time of the test, Transition hadn't fully secured the component specifications but it turns out that the $6,699 USD GX build kit now listed is exactly what we rode, barring the OneUp carbon handlebar. Other than that, you'll have to decide between custom building a carbon frame, which starts at $3,699 and comes with a Fox Float X2, or resorting to the alloy options. The build was well chosen without going overboard on electronic components or exuberant amounts of carbon to satisfy our riding requirements. It turns out that high-performance brakes and suspension are the most important parts to bolt to your bike. TRP's DH-Evo brakes quickly became a group favorite and the Fox 38 Grip2/Float X combo, sans Kashima, worked flawlessly as we've come to expect.
ClimbingOnly a 160mm fork sounds like we might spend too much time on long travel bikes, but in comparison to the other enduro bikes in the Field Test, the Patrol does get a leg up because there is less squish. However, the 63.5-degree head tube angle did have other things to say while getting up there.
Flop is a loose term that comes up when talking about how easily the front wheel tips side to side. That effect is pronounced when a slack bike is pointed uphill due to the increased sag on the rear shock. I wouldn’t call it a problem, but it climbed similarly to the Commencal Meta SX. Turning through switchbacks requires extra attention so the front wheel doesn’t climb the banks of 180-degree turns.
Like the Meta SX though, the slack head angle is rescued by a steep seat angle and fairly long chainstays that keep the rider’s center of gravity still and central on the bike. The focus while navigating lies more in steering rather than sliding around the saddle to find traction.
Even with the climb switch on, the Patrol didn’t have the firmest platform when stomping on the pedals and getting out of the saddle. Fox’s Float X is a superb shock and maybe the Patrol had less anti-squat than I anticipated, but the cheater switch, as Mike Levy calls it, had a softer threshold than usual. Over small bumps though, it was actually relieving and offered more traction. If the shock only has a two-position climb switch, I’d prefer that softer threshold rather than one that mimics a hardtail.
Descending Considering the trails around Bellingham are fast, steep, and filled with tons of jumps, I wanted to grab the Patrol every day. Why? Well, it’s a close contender for what I’d look for in a long travel enduro bike that doesn’t get pigeonholed into any extreme characteristics. Suspension, geometry, and weight equate to a package that is happier to play versus race.
Transition have fine tuned the tried and true Horst link suspension layout over time on their bikes using varying travel brackets. There’s no quirks with the Patrol’s suspension dynamics. There isn't the bump erasing quality of a high pivot machine, but getting acquainted with this bike took less time than the Contra or even the Megatower. Transition has built in a moderate amount of progression that can accept a coil or air shock, too, so the 160mm of travel handled a few hucks without touching the bottom of the pool.
Geometry-wise, the head angle is aggressive, but not out in left field. The slacker 63-degree might let speeds run beyond what the 160mm fork can handle, although you can boost the fork and rear shock to provide 170mm of travel. I’d love to spend more time on the Patrol and tinker with these options because the blend between fun and fast is ever so close to being perfect.
The combo of a slim frame and small rear wheel let you toss the bike around with ease. Where other bikes, like the Contra or Commencal required more effort to get off the ground, the Patrol didn’t get bogged down while pumping trail features to pick up speed or sail over gaps. Although, there's a certain stature about the Patrol that reminds me of the Commencal Meta SX on the descents too, albeit, lighter and shorter. There’s plenty of front wheel ahead of you to push that front axle through braking bumps without feeling like it will tuck underneath you in corners.
Does that make it a suitable enduro race bike? Well, it does lose some muscle in rough, straight lines due to the decrease in travel and it’s not quite as stiff of a package as the Megatower, which could be a pro or con, depending on how “al dente” you like your ride. Where the Patrol Carbon really shines is in soft but steep terrain with plenty of berms to smash and jumps to blast -
have you seen the product launch video? This bike has Bellingham written all over it.
Also, any bike that is available as mullet-only should automatically be disqualified. There is literally no good reason to not let the riders choose the wheelsize they want. There's enough manufacturers that manage to make their bikes either compatible with both wheel sizes or have dedicated versions of the same model. And so should Transition. It's 2022, this should be a given.
-Everyone
M. Beer
With WAO wheels, and full fat CushCore, pedals, tool, pump, water bottle, 32.7 lbs, ready to ride
Seems high. I have a 2022 Sentinel carbon and it’s 31.5 with pedals. Just needs a slightly longer reach (size L)…
I never get, how people can complain about the price of every single component or bike on here, while all the cars I see in the streets nowadays seem to be $60.000 SUVs. How is that normal, while one tenth of that for a bike is outrageous?
Except for the wheels, and tires
My V1 alloy Sentinel, with GX build, Lyrik, and all the above mentioned stuff, was 38.something lbs
I was shocked at the Spire weight, it’s surprisingly light.
Not trying to flex about the weight, just stating what it is.
Never been concerned about weight, as my V1 Sentinel was 38 and change.
You’re welcome to believe or not, thankfully doesn’t really change the outcome
I do believe you aren't lying about what your scale says. Just incredibly hard to believe it's accurate given all the weights that we know to be true and your detailed list of add-ons.
I went a weighed several dumbbells, are all were within ounces of correct.
The bike feels surprisingly light, much lighter than anticipated, in fact, I’d actually like another pound or two, so coil conversion on the fork is a go for sure.
Oriental's not the steepest trail, but it's pretty chunky this year, with plenty of turns and high speed sections that made it work well for lots of repeated timed runs.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiXaRcqXwDU&t=292s&ab_channel=DylanStark
www.instagram.com/p/Ch-Onr1JV_J
While Matt seems perfectly content with whatever is going on.
Lol good catch.
Asking for a friend
Earlier this week I did two days of 1800m descents and had no fade.
I'm 200 lbs, and get minor fade when I'm doing back to back runs at a bike park. So over all, not a huge deal. Code RSCs are still really good brakes, and as pointed out, contact point adjustment is nice.
Will let you know how it works out for me!
Fixed it for you
I've also learned via timed testing that I'm very good at going the exact same pace over and over again, no matter what bike I'm on.
Also, even if the results of the timed tests should be taken with a grain of salt, I like hearing the descriptions and comparisons of how the bikes feel when you all are trying to push them at race pace.
Fell in love with my wife's Scout 6 months ago and nearly all attributes mentioned here apply to the Scout as well.
Would put a coil into the Patrol and try even less than 28% SAG for the fun.
Good stuff Transition, keep it coming !
I’d probably run this patrol with a 180mm fork and a 27.5 front wheel...
27.5 for life !
The guys at Transition know how to put the fun into biking.
Just give customers the longer stroke shock, and let them decide the feeling of the bike based on sag. If they run a 65mm stroke shock and run 20mm of sag, it will feel exactly the same as if they ran a 60mm stroke shock with 20mm of sag, except the bike will have an extra 10mm of travel at bottom out.
Even so, what I'm saying is only the kinematics would differ when you bottomed out the bike if you tested 60mm vs 65mm with the same length of sag (not percentage). If you ran 20mm of sag in either bike, it would behave exactly the same except you'd have an extra 10mm of travel at bottom out.
Transition does the same thing with the scout, and they say you can short stroke the sentinel to have a 140mm trail bike, which makes the least amount of sense because you can just run the regular sentinel with less sag and get the same thing.
This is all probably based on marketing decisions and how best to manage customer's expectations for how each of their bikes should ride - the patrol is more of a 'fun' bike than the spire.
Short stroking bikes is pretty much the stupidest trend in the industry just now.
"Hey guys, we made a great bike, but then we made it slightly worse for no reason before we sold it to you!"
There is literally no reason to limit the shock stroke if the frame can cope with more. Definitely some marketing bods idea. Any engineer who doesn't see why it's a stupid idea should be fired immediately
I came off a 170/170 monster bike that was so plush it ate everything up but it was a tank to pedal and kind of encouraged me to straight line everything! So I was looking for something a bit more nimble but I also didn't want to knock my confidence for bigger features due to the bikes capabilities.
However I have had no problems in that regard with my patrol, I've ridden all the same features and ticked off some new ones without ever feeling under biked. And even though coming from a carbon bike, my patrol is heavy, that didn't seem to effect the climbing. It does climb really well for such a downhill capable bike. The weight only started to be a problem for me when I came to multiday backcountry stuff - and lets face it no enduro bike is going to do that well.
Anyways I think the carbon version will be my unicorn. More than capable enough for what I want to ride, agile, playful, fun, not such a downhill bike I'm exhausted getting up the hill and light enough for the odd backcountry mission.
I do really want to try a coil, to combat some off that rear end jar it can get at speed.
Oh also I can tell my friends my bike is made for a good time and not speed and that is why I'm slower than them!
Nah, you're just kidding
for instance, the insurgent came out in 2015 but now, if you spec it with a 170mm fork, the only difference between it and a 170mm forked wreckoning is 2mm of rear travel, a 27.5 rear wheel and less than half a degree in head tube angle.
similarly, if you spec the megatower with the longer stroke shock, taking the rear travel to 170mm, you've essentially got a nomad but with a 29 rear wheel.
Thanks!
Picked up a pair of 155mm Canfields that feel absolutely perfect for my legs and pedal strikes went to zero. It's so sick now!
In an age of limited stocks, being dependent on warranty or crash replacements is too much of a hassle (not to mention buying a used bike).
I totally dig the company- they make sick riding bikes that are right up my alley, and they got a great vibe. But, sadly, I'm done...
FYI the Evo frame can be bought for 6000 at the moment.
As impressive as the fox38 is, the 160 front end feels overwhelmed in really rough terrain, especially under braking. But I don't want to slacken the bike any more!
I believe the static nor functional geo will change when changing the rear to 170. Another thought that comes to mind is fork sag... increased travel usually comes with increased sag, which maybe counteracts the lowered (unweighted) HA a bit.
It's also very easy to bleed them, and no more wandering bite point too, on 2 and 4 pistons.
I've also rebuilt an old Avid, don't remember wich, with mineral oil compatible seals everywhere, and they worked smoothly. I'd say the were silky smooth, instead watery smooth. That's a feeling I really enjoiyed.
I'm now rebuilding a TRP slate4 caliper to work with shimano servowave lever. It'll have the same clamping power as a 2 piston xt, albeit with much larger pad area. I'm really intrigued to feel how it'll perform.
I've heard Bernard Kerr talking on a vlog of his team using motorex oil on their shimano brakes because they couldn't get shimano stuff on time for the race, and also lots of forums where people swear by Putoline GPR6C 2.5w for rear shocks.
In contrast, this Transition has clean lines and looks good.
I'll still be here (at least for now) droning on about awful frame design, exorbitant MTB bike and accessory prices and how eMTB's are here to stay.
I am 6’’ and want to order a 2022 alloy Patrol, but reading the numbers, I feel like Lg would be too long (reach, wheelbase and chainstay) but tt lenght pretty nice.
And as I always have loved shorter bikes (like the Clash in size M), the Patrol in size M seems to have a perfect wheelbase/chainstay/reach for me, but would feel reaaaaaally short for pedaling..
I am So lost with those numbers haha
How much time do you spend with each bike before timed testing? Do you do all timed testing on the same day/conditions with all bikes or do you do each bike individually on separate days?
Nobody makes a 29er fork in a 37mm offset crown. 37mm(short offset crowns) are used for Transitions 27.5 model bikes. 29er crowns generally come in 51and 44mm offset.
feel free to D.M me if you have more questions.
Cheers.
*proceeds to the fridge*
Contra 2:10:70
Deviate 2:12:40
Commencal 2:13:20
Tracer 2:13:70
Megatower 2:14:10
Fezarri 2:14:25
Patrol 2:14:50
That said, seems like this particular bike leverages the smaller wheel for maximum playfulness. I can see it appealing to a lot of riders.
Sounds like the bike is really well suited to your physique and riding style.
- Trunnion mount blows up your shock after 2 rides
Scott Ransom and Spesh enduro.
By the Scott was the bigger issue with the "bearings" at the trunnion mount. Worn out after 2months of riding...
Spesh is one of the problem with broken shafts etc... the list is long for the spesh enduro haha xD
Certainly not on the level of a broken shock like some are talking about. This is the first I've heard of trunion mount problems though, I thought the only issue was with frames that use a yoke or side load the shaft (like Specialized). I would not expect issues with rocker activated trunion mounts on Horst link bikes.
I didn't even knew I could buy directly from IGUS, here!
Yes Kudos to that! Didn't know that too.
That said, the design released in 2019 completely isolates the shock from chainstay, seatstay and main frame flex, as it is mounted to and driven by three small links (and a shared, concentric axle) that connect the shock to the main link and frame. Assuming good tolerances on these forged parts, there is no reason a trunnion isn't a terrific, space saving solution in the design.
I actually had the 2014 model of that bike, just when they introduced the 155mm travel 29er. Love that bike.
I can't tell you more about the older one etc. just sharing my own experience with the one i'm acutally riding.
Seems like a veiled negative reference to high pivot bikes?
I have ridden a few of the bikes on this test and the mullet works really well for those of us that want the option.
However, there is no denying that the 29er rolls faster on flatter terrain while the 27.5 even as a big bike is a bike I can put where I want more easily and honestly my climbing times are usually faster (aside from on roads) on the 27.5 big bike. What really frustrates me is the constant narrative that 29ers climb better. If you have unlimited leg power and no fatigue and smooth grade, sure a 29er will have slightly better traction and the wheels may roll faster. However, on technical climbs, stepping up ledges where rapid accelerations, etc are necessary the 27.5 rear wheel has a clear advantage. The tires may have slightly less traction but can consistently more easily navigate technical terrain because I can accelerate more quickly and generate more torque in short spurts.
So, I really think people need to get away from absolutes, if you have the same exact bike in both wheel-sizes or mullet (Geo components, near weight, no kinematic changes) I think that >99% of good but not pro riders will end up riding very similar in terms of ride and feel on most terrain.
.... Worse than Mullets No!