GRIM DONUT 3
We Made It Less Terrible
Words by Mike Levy, video by Max Barron
The first Grim Donut wasn't supposed to work... and, to be honest, most of the time it didn't. Sure, it was fast as hell
during timed testing in the last episode, but that was mostly because Yoann Barelli was riding it on our steep and rocky test track. Get it on a normal trail and that's when it felt like you were trying to land the
Spruce Goose on a twisty country lane during rush hour, the only difference being that the Donut is actually a bit longer. And louder.
But if our half-baked effort resulted in
the first Donut going six seconds quicker than a production bike, what would happen if we sat down and took it a bit more seriously? And by that, what I mean is what if we had someone who actually knows what they're doing design the next version of the Grim Donut? It was obvious that we had to make some changes to make it "a bit more rideable" and "a lot less ugly," but most of the bike companies we spoke to had their own ideas, all of which involved adding downtube storage to the first Donut, routing the cables through the headset, and then re-launching it as completely new.
Thankfully, Chris Cocalis at Pivot Cycles agreed to build the second Donut at their in-house prototyping facility – using our geometry numbers – and it would even get a DW Link suspension system to control its 170mm-ish of rear-wheel travel.
Grim Donut V2 Details• Intended use: enduro, downhill
• Fork travel: 170mm
• Rear travel: 165mm - 172mm
• Wheel size: 29"
• Head angle: 58-degrees
• Reach: 513 - 525mm
• Chainstay: 460 / 470 / 480mm
• Frame material: Aluminum
• DW Link suspension (but also not)
• Weight: 35lb
• MSRP: TBA
• Availability: TBA
• Made in Phoenix, AZ, by Pivot Cycles
• More info:
www.pinkbike.com While the first Donut proved that we were onto something, it was only built by Genio to be a rough prototype for us to try out our carefully calculated geometry. That first mule was a proof of concept, but the new Donut was set to use a proven and well-liked suspension system, be much more polished, and it would even have a bottle mount.
What took so long?If it feels like it's been five years since the first Donut debuted, that's because time has been moving slower since 2020. Or at least it feels that way, but smashing through paradigms doesn't happen overnight, people. While other brands were drilling holes in headsets and throwing their entire development budget at e-bikes, we were working hard to perfect the new Donut's geometry, not exactly an overnight process...
I'm not joking; it took only fifteen or twenty minutes to settle on some new numbers that made sense. That was the easy part, though, with us spending the next two years trying to decide if we should paint the frame Obsidian Black, Sable Black, or maybe even get really wild and go with Onyx Black.
Okay, so we fell a little behind schedule and the new Donut is about a year late, give or take another twelve months and a couple of "
spy shots," but have you seen the latest enduro bikes? The Donut might be overdue, and it might have even
spawned some poor imitations, but it's still a decade ahead of everything else on the market, regardless of where they hide their cables or how high the pivots get.
And to be fair, at the end of the first video we did say that the next episode wouldn't be out until 2030, so we're still ahead of schedule in my books.
New Donut, new geometryIf you watched the previous episode, you already know that the first Donut was unstoppable on steep, fast terrain, which is exactly where it went six seconds quicker under Yoann Barelli than the time he put in on his own enduro bike. "
The EWS in Chile? This bike wins by a minute,'' he said of how the first Donut would perform at the dusty South American event where racers often say they find only anti-grip. When I asked if he'd ride the Donut every day, he replied, "
Absolutely not. The way it is right now, the geometry isn't pleasant. When you pedal, you're going to hit them on the ground. And it doesn't corner properly, but it works when you go super fast.''
Sometimes you've got to take things a bit too far in order to find out what really works, and that's precisely what the original Donut did for us.
While it was listed as being a bit steeper on paper, that bike's head angle was actually closer to 56 degrees once we got it out on the trail, and it very much felt that way. The front end had more flip-flop than a Presidential candidate at any speed lower than about 30 kph, and I had six pedal strikes in the first hundred feet of my initial test ride. It was obviously fast – Yoann proved that much – but it was also a death trap crossed with a shopping cart full of empty Monster cans, and not all that rideable by someone without Barelli's skillset.
The next Donut needed to be a bit more useable (and less dangerous) everywhere but without taking away from its abilities on the really gnarly stuff.
After nearly twenty minutes of intense discussions that saw our eyes go bloodshot and a dangerous amount of Fuego Takis eaten, we finally settled on making the head angle 2 degrees steeper. That makes the new Donut the first mountain bike in history that's not as slack as its predecessor, marking a bold new leap forward in geometry technology that we're calling Turn Helper Concept. Our proprietary and revolutionary 58-degree head angle is paired with the 83-degree seat angle that worked so well on the first bike, and we've also lengthed both ends; there's a 525mm reach, a 600mm effective top tube, and three different chainstay settings that allow for a 460, 470, or 480mm rear end. And yes, of course our new geometry technology is patented.
Depending on the chainstay setting, all that adds up to a similar wheelbase as the first bike, but it gets there via a much longer rear-center, a longer reach, and a steeper front end.
DW Link suspension... But also notThe first Donut will always be special to me, but I'll be honest: we spent so much time thinking about the geometry that we kinda just phoned it in for the rear suspension. I had originally
envisioned a high-tech dual-link system, called High Pivot Virtual, that employed an idler pulley and, I believe not coincidentally, looks a lot like what Santa Cruz was investigating in their recent V10 development video. My design was shot down quickly, however, largely because I didn't have a clue what I was talking about but also because I spilled a bubble tea on my drawing and it got really smudged.
What we ended up with was an off-the-shelf single-pivot and pull-style linkage design that did that job, but didn't do it that well. As
Dan Roberts oh-so-kindly pointed out in his Behind the Numbers article, the leverage was relatively linear, it had just 16.3-percent progression, and so little anti-squat that it might have been pro-squat. For anyone who isn't a bicycle scientist, another way to say that might be, "This bike pedals like shit and why is it always sitting halfway into its travel?" Running a coil-sprung shock only aggravated its worst attributes, but the upside is what felt like heroic amounts of traction, which is always a good thing. The downside was a low ride height and pedals that sat dangerously close to the ground, which is always a bad thing. Not that you'd want to pedal that much anyway given its absolutely horrendous (yet amusing)
performance in our faux-science climbing video.
The first Donut was another reminder that while geometry is most important, suspension is next most important.
Having Pivot and Dave Weagle on board meant that the new Donut would use a bespoke DW Link suspension system, a design long renowned for its pedaling efficiency and also its overall performance on everything from cross-country rockets to full-on downhill race bikes. It uses a relatively high amount of anti-squat to keep the suspension calm while the rider is pedaling, which is the exact opposite of its predecessor. That bike had anti-squat numbers that started well under 90-percent before falling way off, while the new DW-equipped Donut stays above 100 until the last third of its travel where it needs to lower.
That means better pedaling performance, of course, but also a higher dynamic ride height that will lower the chances of a devastating high-speed pedal strike.
If you think this is all sounding dangerously respectable, we thought so as well. That's why we asked Weagle to design two suspension layouts on a single bike - there's the DW Link system, but also secondary pivot locations at both the upper and lower links and the lower shock mount. All it takes is ten minutes, a different rocker link, and a few hex keys to take the new Donut from a surprisingly efficient enduro sled to underfilled waterbed on wheels, thereby letting us see how much of a factor the first Donut's suspension was in its surprising performance.
You can see the difference in this chart.
What's next for the Donut?It took us far too long to get to this point, I know, but the result is a bike that's still miles ahead of everything else on the market. Unfortunately for us, while we spent two years arguing over which shade of black to paint the frame, other brands were debuting features that have rendered the new Donut obsolete. Sure, the fresh Donut pedals and handles better than any other enduro bike on the market, bar none, and it's probably minutes quicker over an entire race, but absolutely no one is going to buy it if it doesn't have headset cable routing. And besides, I heard a rumor that 32" wheels are the next big thing...
So we're gonna do the only thing we can, which is to begin work on the next Grim Donut prototype. Expected release date: 2030. Probably. Maybe.
Want more Donut? Part 1: We Went to Taiwan & Made a Bike from the Future - The Grim DonutBehind the Numbers: The Grim DonutWe Tested Our Bike From The Future - The Grim Donut Part 2 (April Fools)Spotted: New Grim Donut Prototype?Introducing the FREE Grim Donut Video Game feat. Mike Levy (Sorry)Pivot Unveils Grim Donut 2 - Sea Otter 2021
(it really is going to change how we communicate)
There once was a guy named Mike Levy,
Whose work was always due yesterday,
He'd procrastinate and delay,
Till the deadline was just hours away.
His boss would shout and give him a chase,
But Mike would just smile with grace,
"I work best under pressure," he'd say,
And somehow, his work was top-notch each day.
So despite all the deadlines he'd miss,
His boss couldn't help but give him a kiss,
For the work that Mike Levy would hand in,
Was always top-notch, with a grin.
So let this be a lesson to all,
That deadlines can be a ball,
And when it comes to work and such,
It's quality, not speed, that matters much!
2) How do you title it "We Made It Less Terrible" and yet it is this colourway with these forks and wheels?
I wouldn't wish colour blindness on anyone...except me on a trial basis, so I can get past this creation of a goth kindergarten class.
"The new Donut employs our proprietary Turn Helper Concept, a revolutionary geometry technology that integrates a forward-thinking approach guaranteed to deliver a paradigm-shifting handling experience for the modern mountain biker in the modern world."
Beautiful.
It's like you've been waiting your whole career to use that line.
Deregulation of the chicken's side of the road was threatening its dominant market position. The chicken was faced with significant challenges to create and develop the competencies required for the newly competitive market. Andersen Consulting, in a partnering relationship with the client, helped the chicken by rethinking its physical distribution strategy and implementation processes. Using the Poultry Integration Model (PIM), Andersen helped the chicken use its skills, methodologies, knowledge, capital and experiences to align the chicken's people, processes and technology in support of its overall strategy within a Program Management framework. Andersen Consulting convened a diverse cross-spectrum of road analysts and best chickens along with Anderson consultants with deep skills in the transportation industry to engage in a two-day itinerary of meetings in order to leverage their personal knowledge capital, both tacit and explicit, and to enable them to synergize with each other in order to achieve the implicit goals of delivering and successfully architecting and implementing an enterprise-wide value framework across the continuum of poultry cross-median processes. The meeting was held in a park-like setting, enabling and creating an impactful environment which was strategically based, industry-focused, and built upon a consistent, clear, and unified market message and aligned with the chicken's mission, vision, and core values. This was conducive towards the creation of a total business integration solution. Andersen Consulting helped the chicken change to become more successful.
"You still have to turn the pedals! It's human powered!" -2030 e bikers talking to the one aCoUsTic biker they see all day.
Amazing video! Thanks xxx
I used to be the one that would laugh at people that said "26" ain't dead", but now I'm here to tell you that 27.5" ain't dead, and it's crazy fun. Bigger isn't always better.
>clock in
>pop open red bull and sit at my desk
>leave up "temporarily away from desk" sign
>ignore all emails, messages, and notes
>watch grim donut video
>read all comments
>take my first break
>another days hard work, fellas
This bike is getting close to Paul Aston's Egerie masterpiece!
I would assume that the longest chainstay setting (480mm) would help counteract that giant front end best?
Strongly inspired by the Donut
Actually, the 2005 Norco Team DH beat it by 17 years. They listed it as slacker than the '04 version, but then they went and screwed up the production batch, and ended up with shopping cart geo. Racing that bike for a complete season was a nightmare, especially considering the '04 version was already steep as hell.
Interesting comparison, because the Spruce Goose only flew once, and the guy who flew it was pretty much in the middle of a mental breakdown, so who knows how it would actually feel to land.
Bit of a metaphor for this video there, @mikelevy?
A+ on the marketing hype, did you guys scoop up one of Specialized's laid off flunkies?
I was thinking about a custom hardtail frame with 82° seat angle, around 500mm reach, and about 610mm top tube.
I think the steeper the seat angle, the more upright the upper body has to be so as not to have all the weight on the arms.
That should climb really well.
IMO, current trail bikes have STA that are in a no-mans-land of bad seat angles (75-77°). In this range, you either want to go steeper or slacker, being stuck in between, having no comfy position. The steeper the STA, the more you recognize the benefits of steeper, but it just isn't steep enough to be comfy--pushing the seat forward feels better, but not optimal.
Should either stay with familiar old school slack HT STA, at least on short travel bikes, or go much more steep, especially on long travel bikes. Making all these incremental steps is a wasteful trap, IMO.
I have a Honzo ESD with 77.5° STA, +-78.5° at sag, with saddle as forward as possible as well, and yes I'm thinking it could be even a little better at 80-82°.
And as you say, when you have a slack STA (73-74°), the butt is so backward that the COG is behind the bottom bracket, but as you steepen the STA, the COG moves forward, and at some point you end up with all the upper body weight on the arms, therefore you have to steepen STA even more so as to have a long reach but shortish toptube so the upper body weight isn't resting on the arms, but is weighting down on the pelvis.
It's almost like you're switching between a holland bike in seated position to a monster reach bike when standing on the pedals.
I think plenty of bike designers out there know what they could do, what they should do and what they can do. I say ride it till it breaks PB! Get your team on it and cause some trouble!
@mikelevy Did they run calcs to determine the amount of (extra?) force on the V2 headtube - compared with 62-63 deg range?
Wonder what would have happened if they retested the norco and tested the GD3 with a single crown on it.
Change the variables and hypothesis test.
In other news, holy shit Matt is fast. And I also love plants too!
-Yoann Barelli (to bike designers everywhere)
P.S do customers really want internal cable routing? I think its one of the worst ideas mtb have had yet.
That sounds like downduro to me.
Headset cable routing maybe?