Video: Tearing Apart the New 2023 Rockshox Boxxer Ultimate Downhill Fork

Jul 26, 2023
by Henry Quinney  

Lots of products get launched at or around Crankworx, and this year is no exception. The new Boxxer has been seen on SRAM's sponsored riders bikes for a long time and I thought it could be worth seeing exactly what was going on inside this new fork. For full disclosure, I haven't ridden this fork yet and I'm purely asking questions about SRAM's design and engineering within this fork, as well as their claims about the performance it can offer. We are working on a full review though and you can expect that shortly.

photo
Gone is the bulge from the middle of the leg.

photo
The air spring, not dissimilar from the systems you'll find within the latest generation of other brands' forks, uses a cartridge system. The inside of the internal leg is also hollow to and is a way of creating an even larger negative air spring.

photo
The damper is essentially a longer, bigger version of the damper you'd find in the Zeb, Lyrik or Pike.

photo
The cartridge system helps Rockshox be very specific with the diameter of the piston.

photo
This elastomer can shrink down from around 30 mm to around 7 mm under harsh compressions. It's similar to what you would find on the shaft of your coil shocks.

photo
At the base of the adjuster you can see the stepped cone that restricts oil flow and is a key part of the brand's high speed compression damping circuit.


Author Info:
henryquinney avatar

Member since Jun 3, 2014
322 articles

79 Comments
  • 167 6
 Totally a clickbait headline. No forks were torn apart. They just disassembled a fork in an orderly fashion. I was expecting a muscly guy to rip one in half like a phone book! This is horse shit!
  • 10 2
 calm down Jean Michel
  • 14 0
 I was hoping for a willit blend approach
  • 19 0
 I was expecting Brage Vestavik smashing it apart with a Marzocchi in each hand
  • 7 1
 "Eddie Halls rips a pack of cards!!" *Eddie Hall taking 3 minutes trying to get off the plastic wrap and seal*
  • 53 0
 Sram, if you are reading this, please make some Zebs in this colour. Cherries on top etc.
  • 20 0
 If you have been paying attention closely, you may have seen a few floating around some Crankworx photos Smile
  • 2 0
 @hukriede: seen this too
  • 3 0
 Spotted in whistler. Check stories of SRAM riders in whistler you’ll see some people with red zebs.
  • 3 0
 @hukriede: where are these photos please!??
  • 2 0
 @morgandewirth: check melamed's stories
  • 2 0
 @xy9ine: dunno if its just me but i can find it!? no worry's Smile
  • 9 2
 @mtbflow24: where's red Zeb? Red Zeb's dead baby red Zeb's dead
  • 21 4
 Classic RS, bring new boxxer from shop and get back instantly to put oil in it
  • 18 2
 There's something to be said about the energy a bulge from the middle of the leg can provide.
  • 2 0
 Shoot from the hip?
  • 2 0
 Kind of weird but the lack of bulge has me _more_ turned on.
  • 16 1
 That was FANTASTIC! And Henry Quinney is definitley the right guy for these kinds of conversations. More detailed tech content like this please!
  • 14 2
 For the next video of ask the engineer: if you could override one decision the marketing team imposed on this design what would it be.

For the next ask the marketing guy: If you had to choose between using a part with an existing standard for the new fork that every shop already has or using a new part with no measurable benefit which would you choose?
  • 10 1
 Tokens are trash! Get rid of them! A third chamber (second positive chamber) is a much higher performance system. A true fully adjustable air spring.

They say its about simplicity. I think it comes down cost. Plastic tokens are cheap. Less parts to manufacture/inventory. Less time developing the extra chamber. Maybe patent infringement or other factors I am not sure.

IFP was the way to go, though. Simple and effective. Predictable and easy to rebuild/service. Old "sealed" bladder setup would just ingest oil/air and bladder would become bloated and you would run into problems quick. Hopefully this IFP setup and its ability to purge ingested oil out the back will mostly eliminate that issue.
  • 5 5
 Tokens are actually better.
Pressure in the 2nd positive chamber dictates mid stroke support more than bottom out. Once the piston in the 2nd chamber goes full travel, bottom out support (or lack of) remains constant.
This comes from pulling apart and extensively tweaking an ohlins 3 chamber air spring.
I will take a well balanced 2 chamber spring & tokens over a 3 chamber air spring any day.
  • 8 1
 @zyoungson: 3 chambers are way more tuneable. You can even put spacers in the 3rd chamber if you like. Tuneability is endless. You can also remove the ifp and turn a 3 chamber in a 2 chamber system. The other way round is not always possible or quite expensive
  • 2 0
 @zyoungson: I did my own third chamber for lyrik and It made a huge difference. You can find me on Instagram: @wytoczywiscie
Higher rate in the middle of the stroke was noticeable, and I was still able to use full travel.
  • 2 0
 @lightone: really nice work
  • 9 0
 As someone who will never take their fork apart and just gets it serviced elsewhere I feel much more knowledgeable now and will make sure all of my friends know what they are talking about
  • 17 9
 Charger 3 damping still doesn't work, and is still harsh. Except now, it's much harder to tune than the Charger 2. RockShox needs to stop believing their own hype and go back to basics of dampers. Manitou has had this figured out for literally decades.
  • 6 1
 Any charger will always be harsh because RS loves digressive damping. Just buy a different brand, problem solved.
  • 2 0
 @lkubica: but the reviewers....
  • 6 0
 @Mac1987: Some people like it, mostly heavier ones or on bikes with more leverage, because then low speed is just normal and high speed is underdamped (when they get standard tunes). I don't believe reviewers, they would say that a bike is lively, planted etc where 50% of it just comes from rear shock tune, but they would never analyze it, they would never try a different shock. Their job is to just show the product which arrived to them with minimum involvement, without plain lying but also without saying inconvenient truths.
  • 1 0
 @lkubica: oh I totally agree, but I was referencing the response of a lot of buyers. The 'every review gives this 10/10 and every review says it either Fox or Rockshox that has redefined the game (again), so it most be the bee's knees' response. I don't agree with that, but it's going to influence the sales regardless.
  • 12 0
 Great piece Henry.
  • 2 0
 This was sweetspot quinney
  • 9 0
 Prototyping this fork since the double header at snowshoe in 2001.... Wait... have I been in a coma?
  • 1 1
 Nope no coma, time travel RS is back to elastomers, its their fall back position, except they renamed them buttercups.
I wonder how many part numbers they will have for this "New" technology.
  • 7 0
 I have to give a big thanks to Steve from Vorsprung for making this video make any sense. All the tech Tuesdays definitely helped make this video make more sense.
  • 6 0
 Genuine question: Why are Rockshox Luftkapping their own fork? They could easily have just moved the air piston quadring up another inch or so...
  • 4 0
 It's almost as if they wanted to make it as complex and costly as they could. The new air spring alone something almost explains the price increase. Or they wanted to change it after some parts were already in production.
  • 3 0
 Maybe you cant put that equalisation port so far up the leg because of machining
  • 5 1
 Sram, please make Hydraulic Bottom Outs systems instead of rubber bumpers!

Also, no tune info? Shim stack measurements? Dyno graphs comparison vs. the previous damper? This article has potential but missing the real nerdy info!
  • 1 1
 I find it odd that they have it on the SDU shock but not their top flight forks? Especially Boxxers given that they are more linear than other air forks, and would most likely benefit from having adjustable HBO
  • 1 3
 @samdaman1: HBO is a bit of a nonsense on anything with mtb levels of travel. HBO makes sense on trophy trucks where a 10" long rubber bumper would just get smashed to pieces in short order, but if you are only trying to control the last inch or so of travel on an mtb, a rubber bumper is fine. In some ways its actually a better system.
  • 1 1
 @gabiusmaximus: Having tried
HBO both front & back I beg to differ, esp.
on flat drops and overshots...
  • 4 2
 Hopefully these ones feel good out of the box. Got a charger 3 Zeb that felt terrible. Took it to get serviced and checked over and while I was told there was nothing wrong with it, they said they'd make it nice and smooth and came back feeling vastly improved. Was able to run about 8 psi more and still have the same sag.
  • 2 0
 Sram forks come stock very "dry". My last two forks were barely lubed from day 0,I took both to my trusted suspension guy and lube all the seals then new oil bath. The Boxxer was terrible,but that initial service made the forks very smooth.
Do not trust new bikes out of the box,it worth a check to the suspension too.
  • 1 0
 Henry, some actual close yo shots of the damper would be nice if possible. I want tk see the 'silencer' on the rebound piston that was talked uo in the ZEB Ultimate press release. They said it was a 'silencing cone' or some such back then. Now it is 'maxima oil engineered for quieter operation' and no mention of the silencer.
  • 1 0
 Henry, some actual close up shots of the damper would be nice if possible.
I want to see the 'silencer' on the rebound piston that was talked uo in the ZEB Ultimate press release. (This looks like jist an alu nut...)
They said it was a 'silencing cone' or some such back then.
Now it is 'maxima oil engineered for quieter operation' and no mention of the silencer.
  • 3 0
 make sure not to get too close up on the piston assemblies there or anything. don't want to give away their secrets.
  • 4 0
 I wonder if this cartridge airspring will fit inside a ZEB?
  • 2 0
 Wondered the same thing sounds like it’s definitely better than the Zeb air spring.
  • 2 1
 Can we get Nigel from NSR or Steve from Vorsprung asking the questions about the forks? I wonder how that conversation would go....buttercups WTF.....orifice damping??..and why do you believe silent damping is important??
  • 1 0
 Henry Quinney absolutely on point here, not using common sentences as "mid stroke support" "bottomless feeling" etc but rather bringing in some real world experience and expertise. Ultra good
  • 2 1
 does such a skinny air piston (with equivilent small volume) create more problems due to heat buildup compared to a large-volume spring?
  • 8 0
 Since the process is roughly adiabatic the temperature increase is proportion to the pressure multiplied by the volume. As the volume gets smaller the pressures increase to provide the same spring force. Since this is proportional there is no increase in air temperature.

That being said the process is not truly adiabatic and you will get some heat transfer to the cylinder. The smaller air cylinders means less surface area (and so less heat transfer for a given cycle) BUT the air cylinder is now internal to the stanchion and does not get active cooling from airflow. Net result is *probably* a slight increase in temperature but I would guess it is probably not a noticeable effect.

Smaller diameter seals are generally lower friction so you might see some benefits there.
  • 3 0
 Good question. It also requires much higher pressures, 175psi for a 175# rider!

Fox does the same thing with the 38, uses a small piston from a 34 in a tube in the leg.
  • 2 0
 @RoboDuck: the total heat energy generated is the same, but isn't it generated over a smaller volume (thus causing higher absolute temperatures)?
  • 2 1
 @RoboDuck: smaller seals equal less friction. But the higher pressure, wich is necessary because of the smaller surface puts more pressure on the seals wich creates more friction. So it does cancel out kind of
  • 3 0
 Are there any extra soft buttercups available aftermarket?
  • 1 0
 My sum of conclusions.. - Coil springs are too linear - Air springs are too progressive - Damping is important Thanks RockShox!
  • 3 0
 why doesn't any one make a progressive wound coil for forks? or a multi stage coil?
  • 5 1
 @ReformedRoadie: Race Only springs does.
  • 8 1
 @plustiresaintdead: but I want to do casual rides with them!
  • 2 1
 @plustiresaintdead: sure about that? I think you may have meant to say "Race Only springs did"
  • 2 1
 @ReformedRoadie: Take a deep breath buddy, I didn't know they were donezo. Congrats on your internet point.
  • 1 0
 there's nothing wrong with coil backed IFP's but damn, ingestion rates on seal heads: bladder vs ifp spring carts ain't that different... ain't
  • 1 0
 Really great questions, Henry. (somehow I can't mention you) Love it! (not really the brand, but the interview). Thanks for the footage!
  • 3 1
 Introducing the new 193mm Boxxer
  • 2 0
 Tim's a fucken rock star. Go Tim. That was rad.
  • 3 5
 Dear Pinkbike, since there's no way autoplay is gonna go anytime soon, can you plesa put english subtitles on your originals?
  • 4 0
 you can disable autoplay if need be.... can be done in Chrome and in your "Video Playback" settings in your profile.
  • 1 1
 You can disable in Pinkbike settings too.
  • 4 1
 @Roost66: it doesn't work in PB settings
  • 1 1
 @bok-CZ: It does for me.
  • 1 0
 @Roost66: I've got autoplay turned of in pinkbike settings. They still f*cking autoplay though.
  • 1 0
 Great video Henry!
  • 4 6
 same damper as the zeb/lyric - so pretty crap then
  • 1 0
 Oh poor you, get over your preconceived ideas, ride one, lube it, ride again, …..what it is only 10,000x better than we used to ride 10yr ago?
  • 1 1
 @NZRalphy: hey that's if it comes from the factory with lube to start with. This isn't about lubing it after every ride this is about the damper being average at best.
  • 1 2
 Looks like a Fox.







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv65 0.046058
Mobile Version of Website